• Photonics Research
  • Vol. 13, Issue 6, 1469 (2025)
Qiarong Xiao, Chen Ding, Tengji Xu, Chester Shu, and Chaoran Huang*
Author Affiliations
  • Department of Electronic Engineering, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong SAR, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.1364/PRJ.551798 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Qiarong Xiao, Chen Ding, Tengji Xu, Chester Shu, Chaoran Huang, "Concept and experimental demonstration of physics-guided end-to-end learning for optical communication systems," Photonics Res. 13, 1469 (2025) Copy Citation Text show less

    Abstract

    Driven by advancements in artificial intelligence, end-to-end learning has become a key method for system optimization in various fields, including communications. However, applying learning algorithms such as backpropagation directly to communication systems is challenging due to their non-differentiable nature. Existing methods typically require developing a precise differentiable digital model of the physical system, which is computationally complex and can cause significant performance loss after deployment. In response, we propose a novel end-to-end learning framework called physics-guided learning. This approach performs the forward pass through the actual transmission channel while simplifying the channel model for the backward pass to a simple white-box model. Despite the simplicity, both experimental and simulation results show that our method significantly outperforms other learning approaches for digital pre-distortion applications in coherent optical fiber systems. It enhances training speed and accuracy, reducing the number of training iterations by more than 80%. It improves transmission quality and noise resilience and offers superior generalization to varying transmission link conditions such as link losses, modulation formats, and scenarios with different transmission distances and optical amplification. Furthermore, our new end-to-end learning framework shows promise for broader applications in optimizing future communication systems, paving the way for more flexible and intelligent network designs.
    y=fChannel(x)=C(x)+n(x)+nr,(A1)

    View in Article

    L=ss^2.(A2)

    View in Article

    Lθde=s^θdeLs^=[fdeθde(y,θde)]TLs^,(A3)

    View in Article

    Ly=s^yLs^=[fdey(y,θde)]TLs^,(A4)

    View in Article

    Lθen=xθenLx=[fenθen(s,θen)]TyxLy.(A5)

    View in Article

    yx=C(x)x+n(x)x.(A6)

    View in Article

    y^phy=C^(x),(A7)

    View in Article

    y^phyx=C^(x)x.(A8)

    View in Article

    Lθen[fenθen(s,θen)]Ty^phyxLy.(A9)

    View in Article

    θdeθdeηLθde,(A10)

    View in Article

    θenθenηLθen,(A11)

    View in Article

    Ldata=yy^data2,(A12)

    View in Article

    y^data=C^(x)+n^data(x)+n¯rdata,(A13)

    View in Article

    y^datax=C^data(x)x+n^data(x)x.(A14)

    View in Article

    Vout=Vin·G1+(Vin·GVsat)44,(B1)

    View in Article

    E(t)=E0[sin(πVI(t)2Vπ)+j·sin(πVQ(t)2Vπ)],(B2)

    View in Article

    z=α·x˜·eiϕPN+nr,(B3)

    View in Article

    Data amount=Symbol length per iteration×(Iteration number for channel modeling+Iteration number for DPD training).(D1)

    View in Article

    Qiarong Xiao, Chen Ding, Tengji Xu, Chester Shu, Chaoran Huang, "Concept and experimental demonstration of physics-guided end-to-end learning for optical communication systems," Photonics Res. 13, 1469 (2025)
    Download Citation