• Infrared Technology
  • Vol. 44, Issue 8, 764 (2022)
Xiaofeng LI1、2、*, Yanbin HE1, Le CHANG1, Guangfan WANG1, and Chuanping XU1
Author Affiliations
  • 1[in Chinese]
  • 2[in Chinese]
  • show less
    DOI: Cite this Article
    LI Xiaofeng, HE Yanbin, CHANG Le, WANG Guangfan, XU Chuanping. Performance Comparison Between Super Second Generation and Third Generation Image Intensifiers[J]. Infrared Technology, 2022, 44(8): 764 Copy Citation Text show less
    References

    [12] LI Xiaofeng, CHANG Le, ZHAO Heng, et al. Comparison of Resolution between Super Gen.Ⅱ and Gen.Ⅲ Image Intensifier[J]. Acta Photonica Sinica, 2021, 50(9): 0904003-1.

    [15] Hoenderken T H, Hagen C W, Nutzel G O, et al. Influence of the microchannel plate and anode gap parameters on the spatial resolution of an image intensifier[J]. Journal of Vacuum, Science and Technology, 2001,19(30): 843-850.

    [16] Photonis Nerthlands B V. Fiber optic phosphor screen comprising angular filter: 8933419B2, USA[P]. 2015-01-13.

    [23] Jan Van Spijker. Ion Barrier Membrane for Use in a Vacuum Tube Using Electron Multiplying, an Electron Multiplying Structure for Use in a Vacuum Tube Using Electron Multiplying as well as a Vacuum Tube Using Electron Multiplying Provided with Such an Electron Multiplying Structure. USA, 8471444B2[P]. 2013-01-25.

    [33] Nutzel G, Lavout P. Sem-transparent Photocathode with Improved Absorption Tate: US, 9960004B2[P]. 2018-05-01.

    LI Xiaofeng, HE Yanbin, CHANG Le, WANG Guangfan, XU Chuanping. Performance Comparison Between Super Second Generation and Third Generation Image Intensifiers[J]. Infrared Technology, 2022, 44(8): 764
    Download Citation