Author Affiliations
State Key Laboratory of Science and Technology on Tunable Laser, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, Heilongjiang 150080, Chinashow less
Fig. 1. Schematic diagrams of double exposure principle. (a) Schematic diagram of double exposure iteration
[13]; (b) simulation flowchart of influence of shelters; (c) schematic diagram of Tukey window function
Fig. 2. Schematic diagram of experimental setup
Fig. 3. Actual photos of imaging targets. (a) Lateral resolution is 0.2 mm; (b) lateral resolution is 0.3 mm
Fig. 4. Experimental results of paper parameter measurement. (a) Illumination light image; (b) average hologram of 60 frames of single B5 paper; (b2) reconstructed amplitude image and (b3) histogram of single B5 paper after single exposure APRA and cutting; (c1) average hologram of 60 frames of thermal paper; (c2) reconstructed amplitude image and (c3) histogram of thermal paper after single exposure APRA and cutting
Fig. 5. Experimental results of detector noise measurement. (a) Image of double-layer B5 paper on detector surface; (b) corresponding histogram and Gaussian fitting curve
Fig. 6. Target scenes, holograms, and reconstructed amplitude images of target with lateral resolution of 0.2 mm. (a1)--(a5) No shelter; (b1)--(b5) thermal paper shelter; (c1)--(c5) B5 paper shelter
Fig. 7. Target scenes, holograms, and reconstructed amplitude images of target with lateral resolution of 0.3 mm. (a1)--(a3) No shelter; (b1)--(b3) thermal paper shelter; (c1)--(c3) B5 paper shelter
Fig. 8. Normalized holograms and reconstructed amplitude images of target with lateral resolution of 0.2 mm. (a1)(a2) B5 paper shelter; (b1)(b2) thermal paper shelter; (c1)(c2) no shelter
Fig. 9. Normalized holograms and reconstructed amplitude images of the target with a lateral resolution of 0.3 mm.(a1)(a2) B5 paper shelter; (b1)(b2) thermal paper shelter
Fig. 10. Reconstructed amplitude image of target with lateral resolution of 0.3 mm
Target resolution /mm | Shelter | M1 | M21 | M22 | C1 | C2 | MSE |
---|
0.2 | No shelter in Fig.6(a4) | 0.25 | 0.83 | 0.80 | 0.69 | 0.68 | 0.002 | 0.2 | Thermal paper in Fig.6(b4) | 0.23 | 0.72 | 0.64 | 0.68 | 0.64 | 0.029 | 0.2 | B5 paper in Fig.6(c4) | 0.17 | 0.54 | 0.48 | 0.68 | 0.64 | 0.139 | 0.2 | No shelter in Fig.6(a5) | 0.39 | 0.89 | 0.90 | 0.57 | 0.57 | 0.006 | 0.2 | Thermal paper in Fig.6(b5) | 0.38 | 0.80 | 0.76 | 0.54 | 0.50 | 0.037 | 0.2 | B5 paper in Fig.6(c5) | 0.36 | 0.67 | 0.62 | 0.45 | 0.41 | 0.116 | 0.3 | No shelter in Fig.7(a3) | 0.40 | 0.88 | 0.88 | 0.55 | 0.54 | 0.013 | 0.3 | Thermal paper in Fig.7(b3) | 0.35 | 0.80 | 0.76 | 0.56 | 0.53 | 0.044 | 0.3 | B5 paper in Fig.7(c3) | 0.34 | 0.66 | 0.63 | 0.48 | 0.45 | 0.122 |
|
Table 1. Mean value and contrast ratio calculated from simulation results
Target resolution /mm | Shelter | M1 | M21 | M22 | C1 | C2 | MSE |
---|
0.2 | No shelter | 0.24 | 0.58 | 0.80 | 0.59 | 0.71 | 0.048 | 0.2 | Thermal paper | 0.33 | 0.52 | 0.53 | 0.37 | 0.38 | 0.118 | 0.3 | Thermal paper | 0.38 | 0.65 | 0.71 | 0.42 | 0.46 | 0.103 | 0.3 | B5 paper | 0.34 | 0.44 | 0.45 | 0.23 | 0.24 | 0.239 |
|
Table 2. Mean value and contrast ratio calculated from experimental results