[1] A Ager A, A Day M, C Vogler K et al. Economic opportunities and trade-offs in collaborative forest landscape restoration. Ecological Economics, 136, 226-239(2017).
[2] A Bagdon B, S Dewhurst, C-H Huang et al. Climate change constrains the efficiency frontier when managing forests to reduce fire severity and maximize carbon storage. Ecological Economics, 140, 201-214(2017).
[3] P Balvanera, M Bennett E. The future of production systems in a globalized world. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 5, 191-198(2007).
[4] L Bohensky E, B Reyers, S Van Jaarsveld A. Conservation in practice: future ecosystem services in a southern African river basin: a scenario planning approach to uncertainty. Conservation Biology, 20, 1051-1061(2006).
[5] B Bonan G, C Doney S. Climate, ecosystems, and planetary futures: The challenge to predict life in Earth system models. Science, 359, 533(2018).
[6] F Bottalico, L Pesola, M Vizzarri et al. Modeling the influence of alternative forest management scenarios on wood production and carbon storage: A case study in the Mediterranean region. Environmental Research, 144, 72-87(2016).
[7] I Altman, R Boumans, J Roman et al. The Multiscale Integrated Model of Ecosystem Services (MIMES): Simulating the interactions of coupled human and natural systems. Ecosystem services, 12, 30-41(2015).
[8] L Brabyn, G Brown. The extrapolation of social landscape values to a national level in New Zealand using landscape character classification. Applied Geography, 35, 84-94(2012).
[9] A Butler J R, J Metcalfe D, Y Wong G et al. An analysis of trade-offs between multiple ecosystem services and stakeholders linked to land use and water quality management in the Great Barrier Reef, Australia. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment, 180, 176-191(2013).
[10] V Cazalis, K Henderson, M Loreau. Do we have to choose between feeding the human population and conserving nature? Modelling the global dependence of people on ecosystem services. Science of the Total Environment, 634, 1463-1474(2018).
[11] D Chen, J Li, X Yang et al. Trade-offs and optimization among ecosystem services in the Weihe River basin. Acta Ecologica Sinica,, 38, 3260-3271(2018).
[12] S Chen D, J Li, X Zhou Z et al. Simulating and mapping the spatial and seasonal effects of future climate and land -use changes on ecosystem services in the Yanhe watershed, China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 25, 1115-1131(2018).
[13] S Chen, H Chen H Y, C Shahi. Economic and ecological trade-off analysis of forest ecosystems: options for boreal forests. Environmental Reviews, 24, 348-361(2016).
[14] W Cheung W, R Sumaila U. Trade-offs between conservation and socio-economic objectives in managing a tropical marine ecosystem. Ecological economics, 66, 193-210(2008).
[15] J Chisasa, D Makina. Bank credit and agricultural output in South Africa: A Cobb-Douglas empirical analysis(2013).
[16] B Bartkowski, M Beckmann, F Cord A et al. Towards systematic analyses of ecosystem service trade-offs and synergies: Main concepts, methods and the road ahead. Ecosystem Services, 28, 264-272(2017).
[17] R Costanza, R d'Arge, R de Groot et al. The value of the ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 387, 253-260(1997).
[18] C Daily G, J Goldstein, S Polasky et al. Ecosystem services in decision making: time to deliver. Frontiers in Ecology & the Environment, 7, 21-28(2009).
[20] R Betts, P Falloon. Climate impacts on European agriculture and water management in the context of adaptation and mitigation—the importance of an integrated approach. Science of the Total Environment, 408, 5667-5687(2010).
[21] L Chen, M Fan, H Shibata. Assessing high impacts of climate change: spatial characteristics and relationships of hydrological ecosystem services in northern Japan (Teshio River watershed). Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 23, 525-552(2018).
[22] R Costanza, C Farber S, A Wilson M. Economic and ecological concepts for valuing ecosystem services. Ecological Economics, 41, 375-392(2002).
[23] Q Feng, B Fu, W Zhao et al. Ecosystem service trade-offs and their influencing factors: A case study in the Loess Plateau of China. Science of the Total Environment, 607, 1250-1263(2017).
[24] M Forsius, B Fu. Ecosystem services modeling in contrasting landscapes. Landscape Ecology, 30, 375-379(2015).
[25] B Fu, D Yu. Trade-off analyses and synthetic integrated method of multiple ecosystem services. Resources Science, 38, 1-9(2016).
[26] M Fu, J Tian, Y Zhu et al. Identification of functional zones and methods of target management in Sanjiangyuan National Park. Biodiversity Science, 25, 71-79(2017).
[27] V Cvetkovic, R Goldenberg, Z Kalantari et al. Distinction, quantification and mapping of potential and realized supply-demand of flow- dependent ecosystem services. Sci Total Environ, 593-, 594, 599-609(2017).
[28] M Grasso. Ecological-economic model for optimal mangrove trade off between forestry and fishery production: comparing a dynamic optimization and a simulation model. Ecological Modelling, 112, 131-150(1998).
[29] H Brunner S, A Gret-Regamey, E Siren et al. Review of decision support tools to operationalize the ecosystem services concept. Ecosystem Services,, 26, 306-315(2017).
[30] M Christie, B Fisher, d Groot R S et al. Integrating the ecological and economic dimensions in biodiversity and ecosystem service valuation. The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity (TEEB): Ecological and Economic Foundations. London: Earthscan Press.(2010).
[31] R Haines-Young, F Kienast, M Potschin. Indicators of ecosystem service potential at European scales: mapping marginal changes and trade-offs. Ecological Indicators, 21, 39-53(2012).
[32] W Han. Xi'an metropolitan area agricultural ecosystem service trade- off and synergy relationship and its driving force. Shaanxi Normal University(2016).
[33] Y Hao M, Y Ren Z, J Sun Y et al. Dynamic analysis of trade-offs and synergies between ecosystem services in Guanzhong Basin. Geography Research, 36, 592-602(2017).
[34] J He, J Huang, C Li. The evaluation for the impact of land use change on habitat quality: A joint contribution of cellular automata scenario simulation and habitat quality assessment model. Ecological Modelling, 366, 58-67(2017).
[35] J Fu B, T Hu H, H Lü Y et al. SAORES: A spatially explicit assessment and optimization tool for regional ecosystem services. Landscape Ecology, 30, 547-560(2015).
[36] B Huang I, J Keisler, I Linkov. Multi-criteria decision analysis in environmental sciences: Ten years of applications and trends. Science of the Total Environment,, 409, 3578-3594(2011).
[37] L Eklundh, P Jonsson. TIMESAT-a program for analyzing time- series of satellite sensor data. Computers & Geosciences, 30, 833-845(2004).
[38] F Cord A, A Kaim, M Volk. A review of multi-criteria optimization techniques for agricultural land use allocation. Environmental Modelling & Software, 105, 79-93(2018).
[39] R Alkemade, H Kim, D Rosa I M et al. A protocol for an intercomparison of biodiversity and ecosystem services models using harmonized land-use and climate scenarios. bioRxiv, 10.1101/300632.(2018).
[40] S Arnhold, I Kim. Mapping environmental land use conflict potentials and ecosystem services in agricultural watersheds. Science of the Total Environment, 630, 827-838(2018).
[41] S Lautenbach, M Strauch, M Volk et al. Optimization-based trade- off analysis of biodiesel crop production for managing an agricultural catchment. Environmental Modelling & Software, 48, 98-112(2013).
[42] A Bryan B, A Law E, E Meijaard et al. Mixed policies give more options in multifunctional tropical forest landscapes. Journal of Applied Ecology, 54, 51-60(2017).
[43] T Decaens, N Jegou, S Le Clec'h et al. a. From field data to ecosystem services maps: using regressions for the case of deforested areas within the Amazon. Ecosystems, 21, 216-236(2018).
[44] V Gond, S Le Clec'h, S Sloan et al. Mapping ecosystem services at the regional scale: the validity of an upscaling approach. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 32, 1593-1610(2018).
[45] S Lautenbach, H Lee. A quantitative review of relationships between ecosystem services. Ecological Indicators, 66, 340-351(2016).
[46] Y Bai, H Jiang, J Li et al. Indicators for spatial-temporal comparisons of ecosystem service status between regions: A case study of the Taihu River Basin, China. Ecological Indicators, 60, 1008-1016(2016).
[47] T Li, Y Lü. A review on the progress of modeling techniques in ecosystem services. Acta Ecologica Sinica,, 38, 5287-5296(2018).
[48] C Li Y, M Liu C, J Yu J. The balance of wetland protection and cultivated land reclamation in sanjiang plain. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 28, 39-42(2006).
[49] Y Li, G Liu, Y Luo et al. Effects of land use change on ecosystem services: a case study in Miyun reservoir watershed. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 33, 726-736(2013).
[50] Y Li, J Yan, L Zhang et al. Mapping the hotspots and coldspots of ecosystem services in conservation priority setting. Journal of Geographical Sciences,, 27, 681-696(2017).
[51] Q Lin. Research on the method of grassland ecosystem service trade-off. Beijing Forestry University(2012).
[52] Y Fan, H Liu, D Shengyan. Research progress of ecosystem service flow. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 27, 2161-2171(2016).
[53] J Fan, J Liu, Q Shao. The integrated assessment indicator system of grassland ecosystem in the Three-River Headwaters region. Geographical Research, 28, 273-283(2009).
[54] L Cheng, H Lu C. Conflicts between land use change and ecological service functions. Arid Zone Research, 24, 302-306(2007).
[55] J Maes, M Paracchini, G Zulian et al. Synergies and trade-offs between ecosystem service supply, biodiversity, and habitat conservation status in Europe. Biological Conservation, 155, 1-12(2012).
[56] E Kautsky E, K Malmborg, H Sinare et al. Mapping regional livelihood benefits from local ecosystem services assessments in rural Sahel.
[57] A Crowe, J Dunbar M, C Maskell L et al. Exploring the ecological constraints to multiple ecosystem service delivery and biodiversity. Journal of Applied Ecology, 50, 561-571(2013).
[58] Assesment Millennium Ecosystem. Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Synthesis(2005).
[59] H Bugmann, T Cordonnier, M Mina et al. Future ecosystem services from European mountain forests under climate change. Journal of Applied Ecology, 54, 389-401(2017).
[60] S Gummadi, R Mulwa, C Rao K P et al. Impacts of climate change on agricultural household welfare in Kenya. Climate Research,, 67, 87-97(2016).
[61] G Mendoza, E Nelson, J Regetz et al. Modeling multiple ecosystem services, biodiversity conservation, commodity production, and tradeoffs at landscape scales. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment,, 7, 4-11(2009).
[62] T Nguyen T, T Van Y, A Verdoodt et al. Design of a GIS and multi-criteria based land evaluation procedure for sustainable land-use planning at the regional level. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 200, 1-11(2015).
[63] F Pagella T, L Sinclair F. Development and use of a typology of mapping tools to assess their fitness for supporting management of ecosystem service provision. Landscape Ecology, 29, 383-399(2014).
[64] H Böttcher, E-M Nordström, X Pang et al. Trade-offs and synergies among ecosystem services under different forest management scenarios-The LEcA tool. Ecosystem Services, 28, 67-79(2017).
[65] J Camm, E Nelson, S Polasky et al. Where to put things? Spatial land management to sustain biodiversity and economic returns. Biological Conservation, 141, 1505-1524(2008).
[66] D Haase, A Priess J, C Pueffel. Mapping ecosystem services on brownfields in Leipzig, Germany. Ecosystem Services,, 30, 73-85(2018).
[67] Q Lin, S Rao, H Wang X et al. Zhenglan Banner grassland ecosystem servicetrade-off research. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 29, 81-86(2015).
[68] E Bennett, D Peterson G, C Raudsepp-Hearne. Ecosystem service bundles for analyzing tradeoffs in diverse landscapes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107, 5242-5247(2010).
[69] S Raum. A framework for integrating systematic stakeholder analysis in ecosystem services research: Stakeholder mapping for forest ecosystem services in the UK. Ecosystem Services, 29, 170-184(2018).
[70] J Adamowski, K John, K Reilly. Participatory mapping of ecosystem services to understand stakeholders' perceptions of the future of the Mactaquac Dam, Canada. Ecosystem Services, 30, 107-123(2018).
[71] M Bennett E, D Renard, M Rhemtulla J. Historical dynamics in ecosystem service bundles. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,, 112, 13411-13416(2015).
[72] D Beard T, M Bennett E, P Rodriguez J et al. Trade-offs across space, time, and ecosystem services.. Ecology and Society, 11(2006).
[73] W Douven, T Hein, S Sanon et al. Quantifying ecosystem service trade-offs: The case of an urban floodplain in Vienna, Austria. Journal of Environmental Management, 111, 159-172(2012).
[74] P Holmes T, J Lee K, H Schaberg R et al. Ascribing value to ecological processes: an economic view of environmental change. Forest Ecology and Management, 114, 329-338(1999).
[75] S Candiago, L Egarter Vigl, U Schirpke et al. Integrating supply, flow and demand to enhance the understanding of interactions among multiple ecosystem services. The Science of the Total Environment, 651, 928-941(2018).
[76] M Daams, H Farjon, K Scholte S S et al. Mapping recreation as an ecosystem service: Considering scale, interregional differences and the influence of physical attributes. Landscape and Urban Planning, 175, 149-160(2018).
[77] M Schuerch, T Spencer, S Temmerman et al. Future response of global coastal wetlands to sea-level rise. Nature, 561, 231-234(2018).
[78] M Donovan T, S Keeton W, S Schwenk W et al. Carbon storage, timber production, and biodiversity: Comparing ecosystem services with multi-criteria decision analysis. Ecological Applications, 22, 1612-1627(2012).
[79] S Lautenbach, R Seppelt, M Volk. Identifying trade-offs between ecosystem services, land use, and biodiversity: A plea for combining scenario analysis and optimization on different spatial scales. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 5, 458-463(2013).
[80] E Schulp C J, M Serna-Chavez H, M van Bodegom P et al. A quantitative framework for assessing spatial flows of ecosystem services. Ecological Indicators, 39, 24-33(2014).
[81] D Masante, K Sharps, A Thomas et al. Comparing strengths and weaknesses of three ecosystem services modelling tools in a diverse UK river catchment. Science of the Total Environment, 584-, 585, 118-130(2017).
[82] H Ancona Z, J Semmens D, C Sherrouse B et al. Analyzing land-use change scenarios for trade-offs among cultural ecosystem services in the Southern Rocky Mountains. Ecosystem Services, 26, 431-444(2017).
[83] R Gorddard, N House A P, P Smith F et al. Biodiversity and agriculture: Production frontiers as a framework for exploring trade-offs and evaluating policy. Environmental Science & Policy, 23, 85-94(2012).
[84] R-U Syrbe, U Walz. Spatial indicators for the assessment of ecosystem services: Providing, benefiting and connecting areas and landscape metrics. Ecological Indicators, 21, 80-88(2012).
[85] S Blagodatsky, I Haeuser, K Thellmann et al. Assessing ecosystem services in rubber dominated landscapes in South-East Asia-a challenge for biophysical modeling and transdisciplinary valuation. Forests, 8, 505(2017).
[86] S Anderson, M Gonzales-Chang, G Turner K et al. A review of methods, data, and models to assess changes in the value of ecosystem services from land degradation and restoration. Ecological Modelling, 319, 190-207(2016).
[87] C Griess V, A Hahn W, B Uhde et al. Hybrid MCDA Methods to integrate multiple ecosystem services in forest management planning: A Critical Review. Environmental Management, 56, 373-388(2015).
[88] R Biggs, R Scholes, A Van Jaarsveld et al. Measuring conditions and trends in ecosystem services at multiple scales: the Southern African Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (SAfMA) experience. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 360, 425-441(2005).
[89] C Frank F, F Viglizzo E. Land-use options for Del Plata Basin in South America: Tradeoffs analysis based on ecosystem service provision. Ecological economics, 57, 140-151(2006).
[90] J Staes, T Vandenbroucke, D Vrebos et al. Mapping ecosystem service flows with land cover scoring maps for data-scarce regions. Ecosystem Services, 13, 28-40(2015).
[91] J Liu, Q Shao, B Wang J et al. Spatial-temporal patterns of net primary productivity for 1988-2004 based on GLOPEM-CEVSA model in the “Three-River Headwaters” region of Qinghai province, China. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 33, 254-269(2009).
[92] J Dong, J Wang, Y Yi et al. Decreasing net primary production due to drought and slight decreases in solar radiation in China from 2000 to 2012. Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences, 122, 261-278(2017).
[93] J Ding, G Li, Y Wang et al. A combined GLAS and MODIS estimation of the global distribution of mean forest canopy height. Remote Sensing of Environment, 174, 24-43(2016).
[94] W Fan, X Wang, H Wei et al. Integrating supply and social demand in ecosystem services assessment: A review. Ecosystem Services,, 25, 15-27(2017).
[95] E Schulp C J, H Verburg P, S Wolff. Mapping ecosystem services demand: A review of current research and future perspectives. Ecological Indicators, 55, 159-171(2015).
[96] B Fu, S Wang, X Wu et al. Land use optimization based on ecosystem service assessment: A case study in the Yanhe watershed. Land Use Policy,, 72, 303-312(2018).
[97] H Xue. Studies on services from artificial ecosystems. Hangzhou, Zhejiang University(2013).
[98] Y Liu, S Yang, W Zhao et al. Influence of land use change on the ecosystem service trade-offs in the ecological restoration area: Dynamics and scenarios in the Yanhe watershed, China. The Science of the total environment, 644, 556-566(2018).
[99] G Li, C Wang, T Yang et al. Forest canopy height mapping over China using GLAS and MODIS data. Science China Earth Sciences, 58, 96-105(2015).
[100] Y Jin, T Sun, W Yang et al. Trade-offs among ecosystem services in coastal wetlands under the effects of reclamation activities. Ecological Indicators, 92, 354-366(2018).
[101] H He, G Yu, Y Zhou. Ecosystem observation and research under background of big data. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 33, 832-837(2018).
[102] Y Wen, X Zhou, H Zhu et al. Effects of understory management on trade-offs and synergies between biomass carbon stock, plant diversity and timber production in eucalyptus plantations. Forest Ecology and Management, 410, 164-173(2018).