• Chinese Journal of Lasers
  • Vol. 49, Issue 21, 2104001 (2022)
Peng Feng1、2, Zhongliang Li1、2、*, Xiangzhao Wang1、2, Yang Bu1、2, Yunjun Lu1、2, Fudong Guo1, and Sikun Li1、2
Author Affiliations
  • 1Laboratory of Information Optics and Opto-Electronic Technology, Shanghai Institute of Optics and Fine Mechanics,Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 201800, China
  • 2Center of Materials Science and Optoelectronics Engineering, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/CJL202249.2104001 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Peng Feng, Zhongliang Li, Xiangzhao Wang, Yang Bu, Yunjun Lu, Fudong Guo, Sikun Li. Polarization Phase-Shifting Point Diffraction Interferometry for Measuring Wavefront Aberration[J]. Chinese Journal of Lasers, 2022, 49(21): 2104001 Copy Citation Text show less
    Principle of polarization phase-shifting point diffraction interferometry
    Fig. 1. Principle of polarization phase-shifting point diffraction interferometry
    Restructuring interference patterns
    Fig. 2. Restructuring interference patterns
    Schematics of system errors calibration. (a) Point diffraction measurement mode; (b) system errors measurement mode
    Fig. 3. Schematics of system errors calibration. (a) Point diffraction measurement mode; (b) system errors measurement mode
    Schematic of experimental step
    Fig. 4. Schematic of experimental step
    Interferograms collected in experiment. (a) Single interferogram; (b) phase-shifting interferograms
    Fig. 5. Interferograms collected in experiment. (a) Single interferogram; (b) phase-shifting interferograms
    Wavefront aberration detection results of measured objective lens (all measurement results remove Z1-Z4 terms of Zernike polynomia, that is, measurement results remove piston, x-tilt, y-tilt, and defocus). (a) Point diffraction measurement results with measurement RMS of 41.67 nm; (b) systematic errors measurement results with measurement RMS of 41.07 nm; (c) wave aberration detection results with measurement RMS of 10.49 nm
    Fig. 6. Wavefront aberration detection results of measured objective lens (all measurement results remove Z1Z4 terms of Zernike polynomia, that is, measurement results remove piston, x-tilt, y-tilt, and defocus). (a) Point diffraction measurement results with measurement RMS of 41.67 nm; (b) systematic errors measurement results with  measurement RMS of 41.07 nm; (c) wave aberration detection results with measurement RMS of 10.49 nm
    Vibration spectrum diagram of platform
    Fig. 7. Vibration spectrum diagram of platform
    Thirty-two wavefront aberration measurement results under vibration environment. (a) Repeatability of 32 wavefront aberration measurements; (b) measurement repeatability of Z5-Z9 after measurement results are fitted with Zernike polynominal
    Fig. 8. Thirty-two wavefront aberration measurement results under vibration environment. (a) Repeatability of 32 wavefront aberration measurements; (b) measurement repeatability of Z5Z9 after measurement results are fitted with Zernike polynominal
    Peng Feng, Zhongliang Li, Xiangzhao Wang, Yang Bu, Yunjun Lu, Fudong Guo, Sikun Li. Polarization Phase-Shifting Point Diffraction Interferometry for Measuring Wavefront Aberration[J]. Chinese Journal of Lasers, 2022, 49(21): 2104001
    Download Citation