• High Power Laser and Particle Beams
  • Vol. 33, Issue 11, 114001 (2021)
Chaofan An1、2, Xiucui Xie1、*, and Yuehu Pu3、4
Author Affiliations
  • 1Shanghai Institute of Applied Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 201800, China
  • 2University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
  • 3Shanghai APACTRON Particle Equipment Co, Ltd, Shanghai 201800, China
  • 4Shanghai Institute of Advanced Studies, Chinese Academy of Sciences , Shanghai 201210, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.11884/HPLPB202133.210302 Cite this Article
    Chaofan An, Xiucui Xie, Yuehu Pu. Effects of bunch state on measurement of beam emittance and energy[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2021, 33(11): 114001 Copy Citation Text show less
    Schematic diagram of the beam energy measurement system
    Fig. 1. Schematic diagram of the beam energy measurement system
    The beam measurement system design structure diagram
    Fig. 2. The beam measurement system design structure diagram
    The results of simulated measurement of the APF output beam
    Fig. 3. The results of simulated measurement of the APF output beam
    [in Chinese]
    Fig. 3. [in Chinese]
    Relationship between the magnetic field gradient of the third magnet and the position of the screen 第3块磁铁磁场梯度变化与荧光靶处的关系
    Fig. 4. Relationship between the magnetic field gradient of the third magnet and the position of the screen 第3块磁铁磁场梯度变化与荧光靶处 的关系
    The relation between j0−j and kinetic energy
    Fig. 5. The relation between j0j and kinetic energy
    The relation between j0−j and j0−j和的关系
    Fig. 6. The relation between j0j and j0j和 的关系
    Tracewin simulated beam current distribution using the Faraday cup
    Fig. 7. Tracewin simulated beam current distribution using the Faraday cup
    particle bunch${\alpha }_{x}$$\;{\beta }_{x}$/(mm/(π·mrad)) ${\alpha }_{y}$$\;{\beta }_{y}$/(mm/(π·mrad)) ${\alpha }_{{\textit{z}} }$$\;{\beta }_{{\textit{z}} }$/(mm/(π·mrad)) xx′/(mm/(π·mrad)) yy′/(mm/(π·mrad)) ${E}_{K}$/MeV
    ideal bunch0.1150.7850.1210.760−1.8612.7810.3140.3156.98
    non-ideal bunch0.0200.6400.0270.617−3.3081.6970.3760.3776.79
    Table 1. Initial parameters of ideal and non-ideal bunch
    nameemittance of ideal bunch (normalized RMS)/( $\mathrm{ {\text{π} } }\cdot\mathrm{m}\mathrm{m}\cdot\mathrm{m}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{d}$) emittance of non-ideal bunch (normalized RMS)/( $\mathrm{ {\text{π} } }\cdot \mathrm{m}\mathrm{m}\cdot \mathrm{m}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{d}$)
    directionxyxy
    emittance at entrance obtained by the least square method0.3020.3020.8210.433
    calculated input emittance of the software0.2880.3020.3760.377
    relative error/%4.640118.3514.85
    Table 2. The results of the emittance at the entrance obtained by the two methods and their relative errors
    j0j/(°) initial beam emittance (normalized RMS)/( $\mathrm{ {\text{π} } }\cdot\mathrm{m}\mathrm{m}\cdot\mathrm{m}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{d}$) fitting the emittance of beam (normalized RMS)/( $\mathrm{ {\text{π} } }\cdot\mathrm{m}\mathrm{m}\cdot\mathrm{m}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{d}$) relative error/%
    directionxyxyxy
    10800.3760.3770.3370.35710.375.3
    12600.3760.3770.3630.3643.463.45
    14400.3760.3770.4020.3706.911.86
    16200.3760.3770.4570.37621.540.27
    18000.3760.3770.5150.38336.971.59
    21600.3760.3770.7740.410105.853.3
    23400.3760.3770.8190.432117.8214.59
    Table 3. Simulated emittance measurement results after changing phase difference
    particle bunchthe highest point where the current through slit2 deviates from point J/mm energy spread/ MeV degree of energy spread/% relative error with standard energy /%
    ideal bunch−0.3750.074441.20.09
    non-ideal bunch−7.50.07961.151.77
    Table 4. Simulation results of beam energy measured by analyzing magnet
    Chaofan An, Xiucui Xie, Yuehu Pu. Effects of bunch state on measurement of beam emittance and energy[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2021, 33(11): 114001
    Download Citation