• High Power Laser Science and Engineering
  • Vol. 1, Issue 1, 01000011 (2013)
Quanli Dong1、2, Dawei Yuan2, Shoujun Wang2, Xun Liu2, Yutong Li2, Xiaoxuan Lin2, Huigang Wei3, Jiayong Zhong3, Shaoen Jiang4, Yongkun Ding4, Bobin Jiang4, Kai Du4, Yongjian Tang4, Mingyang Yu5、6, Xiantu He5、7, Neng Hua8, Zhanfeng Qiao8, Kuixi Huang8, Ming Chen8, Jianqiang Zhu8, Gang Zhao3, Zhengming Sheng2, and Jie Zhang2、9
Author Affiliations
  • 1School of Physics and Optoelectronic Engineering, Ludong University, Yantai 260405, China
  • 2Beijing National Laboratory of Condensed Matter Physics, Institute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100080, China
  • 3Key Laboratory of Optical Astronomy, National Astronomical Observatories, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100012, China
  • 4Research Center for Laser Fusion, China Academy of Engineering Physics, Mianyang 621900, China
  • 5Institute for Fusion Theory and Simulation, Physics Department, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China
  • 6Institute for Theoretical Physics I, Ruhr University, D-44780 Bochum, Germany
  • 7Institute of Applied Physics and Computational Mathematics, Beijing 100094, China
  • 8National Laboratory on High Power Lasers and Physics, Shanghai 201800, China
  • 9Key Laboratory for Laser Plasmas (MoE) and Department of Physics, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.1017/hpl.2013.2 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Quanli Dong, Dawei Yuan, Shoujun Wang, Xun Liu, Yutong Li, Xiaoxuan Lin, Huigang Wei, Jiayong Zhong, Shaoen Jiang, Yongkun Ding, Bobin Jiang, Kai Du, Yongjian Tang, Mingyang Yu, Xiantu He, Neng Hua, Zhanfeng Qiao, Kuixi Huang, Ming Chen, Jianqiang Zhu, Gang Zhao, Zhengming Sheng, Jie Zhang. Anomalous-plasmoid-ejection-induced secondary magnetic reconnection: modeling solar flares and coronal mass ejections by laser–plasma experiments[J]. High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2013, 1(1): 01000011 Copy Citation Text show less
    Schematic illustration of the experiment setup. Three pinhole cameras were installed to monitor laser–plasmas from the back, front and side, respectively. Modified Nomarski interferometry applying a 532 nm laser beam in 150 ps Gaussian pulse was used as the main diagnostic in the front of the target to measured the plasma density. An imaging system with magnification ratio of 1.5 was used to monitor the target plasma profile.
    Fig. 1. Schematic illustration of the experiment setup. Three pinhole cameras were installed to monitor laser–plasmas from the back, front and side, respectively. Modified Nomarski interferometry applying a 532 nm laser beam in 150 ps Gaussian pulse was used as the main diagnostic in the front of the target to measured the plasma density. An imaging system with magnification ratio of 1.5 was used to monitor the target plasma profile.
    Detailed comparisons between the solar phenomena and the experimental results. (a) shows the loop-top hard-X-ray spot as well as the two loop-foot spots, with the sketch indicating the invoked magnetic reconnection as the cause; (b) is the experimental results with a bright X-ray spot on the Cu target initially set in the path of the expected MR outflow; (c) shows the Yohkoh-recorded cusp-shaped magnetic loop at the end of the MR current sheet near the solar photospheric surface, and (d) the detaching U-shaped magnetic loop from the other end of the current sheet.
    Fig. 2. Detailed comparisons between the solar phenomena and the experimental results. (a) shows the loop-top hard-X-ray spot as well as the two loop-foot spots, with the sketch indicating the invoked magnetic reconnection as the cause; (b) is the experimental results with a bright X-ray spot on the Cu target initially set in the path of the expected MR outflow; (c) shows the Yohkoh-recorded cusp-shaped magnetic loop at the end of the MR current sheet near the solar photospheric surface, and (d) the detaching U-shaped magnetic loop from the other end of the current sheet.
    Plasma images taken at 532 nm. (a) is the raw image. (b) is produced by the pre-measured background correction to (a), while (c) is produced from (a) in the same way, but with 25% extra intensity enhancement in the background. (d) is the schematic image structure with enlightened magnetic separatrices and bright areas in (c) represented by solid lines. (e) Schematic diagram of a disrupted magnetic field forming in the breakout CME scenario. (d) and (e) are compared component by component as the notes indicate.
    Fig. 3. Plasma images taken at 532 nm. (a) is the raw image. (b) is produced by the pre-measured background correction to (a), while (c) is produced from (a) in the same way, but with 25% extra intensity enhancement in the background. (d) is the schematic image structure with enlightened magnetic separatrices and bright areas in (c) represented by solid lines. (e) Schematic diagram of a disrupted magnetic field forming in the breakout CME scenario. (d) and (e) are compared component by component as the notes indicate.
    Quanli Dong, Dawei Yuan, Shoujun Wang, Xun Liu, Yutong Li, Xiaoxuan Lin, Huigang Wei, Jiayong Zhong, Shaoen Jiang, Yongkun Ding, Bobin Jiang, Kai Du, Yongjian Tang, Mingyang Yu, Xiantu He, Neng Hua, Zhanfeng Qiao, Kuixi Huang, Ming Chen, Jianqiang Zhu, Gang Zhao, Zhengming Sheng, Jie Zhang. Anomalous-plasmoid-ejection-induced secondary magnetic reconnection: modeling solar flares and coronal mass ejections by laser–plasma experiments[J]. High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2013, 1(1): 01000011
    Download Citation