• Acta Photonica Sinica
  • Vol. 51, Issue 4, 0406004 (2022)
Jianlei ZHANG*, Hanyu HE, Huan NIE, Xiaofen QIU, Jiaqi LI, Yi YANG, and Fengtao HE
Author Affiliations
  • School of Electronic Engineering,Xi'an University of Posts and Telecommunications,Xi'an 710121,China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/gzxb20225104.0406004 Cite this Article
    Jianlei ZHANG, Hanyu HE, Huan NIE, Xiaofen QIU, Jiaqi LI, Yi YANG, Fengtao HE. Performance of Double-headed Pulse Interval Modulated Wireless Optical Communication System in Anisotropic Ocean Turbulence[J]. Acta Photonica Sinica, 2022, 51(4): 0406004 Copy Citation Text show less
    OOK/PPM/DPIM/DH-PIM1/DH-PIM2 symbol structure
    Fig. 1. OOK/PPM/DPIM/DH-PIM1/DH-PIM2 symbol structure
    DHPIM(α=1)symbol structure
    Fig. 2. DHPIM(α=1)symbol structure
    Block diagram of DHPIM UWOC system under anisotropic turbulence with Gaussian beam
    Fig. 3. Block diagram of DHPIM UWOC system under anisotropic turbulence with Gaussian beam
    Packet error rate PER versus ω for various anisotropic factors
    Fig. 4. Packet error rate PER versus ω for various anisotropic factors
    Packet error rate PER versus χT for various anisotropic factors
    Fig. 5. Packet error rate PER versus χT for various anisotropic factors
    Packet error rate PER versusεfor various anisotropic factors
    Fig. 6. Packet error rate PER versusεfor various anisotropic factors
    Packet error rate PER versus Rb various anisotropic factors
    Fig. 7. Packet error rate PER versus Rb various anisotropic factors
    Packet error rate PER versus transmission distance L for various anisotropic factors
    Fig. 8. Packet error rate PER versus transmission distance L for various anisotropic factors
    Packet error rate PER versus R for various anisotropic factors
    Fig. 9. Packet error rate PER versus R for various anisotropic factors
    Packet error rate PER versus modulation index M for various aperture diameters
    Fig. 10. Packet error rate PER versus modulation index M for various aperture diameters
    Packet error rateω=-1.5ω=-0.5

    χT=1×10-6/

    (K2·s-1

    χT=9×10-6/

    (K2·s-1

    ε=0.01/

    (m2·s-1

    ε=0.1/

    (m2·s-1

    μx,μy=1,18.73×10-142.576×10-113.017×10-124.201×10-113.017×10-121.269×10-13
    μx,μy=1,21.089×10-151.821×10-114.734×10-133.386×10-114.734×10-132.176×10-15
    μx,μy=2,25.895×10-234.637×10-124.384×10-162.027×10-114.384×10-163.556×10-22
    μx,μy=3,21.077×10-271.861×10-123.789×10-181.398×10-113.789×10-183.211×10-26
    Table 1. The packet error rate of UWOC system under different ocean turbulence parameters
    Packet error rateRb=1×107/(bit·s-1)Rb=1×108/(bit·s-1)L=80/mL=160/m

    R=0.3

    /(A·W-1)

    R=0.6

    /(A·W-1)

    μx,μy=3,23.789×10-181.925×10-74.618×10-144.508×10-111.26×10-71.085×10-15
    μx,μy=5,23.251×10-204.46×10-95.527×10-153.311×10-117.14×10-95.249×10-17
    μx,μy=7,25.122×10-211.08×10-92.358×10-152.919×10-112.256×10-92.158×10-34
    Table 2. The packet error rate of UWOC system under different parameters brit rate、tansmission distance、responsivity
    Packet error rateD=4.5 mmD=5 mmD=5.5 mmD=6 mm
    M=41.473×10-124.734×10-131.505×10-134.741×10-14
    M=62.007×10-76.49×10-82.075×10-86.569×10-9
    M=97.729×10-22.601×10-28.644×10-32.842×10-3
    Table 3. The packet error rate of UWOC system under different modulation index
    Jianlei ZHANG, Hanyu HE, Huan NIE, Xiaofen QIU, Jiaqi LI, Yi YANG, Fengtao HE. Performance of Double-headed Pulse Interval Modulated Wireless Optical Communication System in Anisotropic Ocean Turbulence[J]. Acta Photonica Sinica, 2022, 51(4): 0406004
    Download Citation