• Photonics Research
  • Vol. 6, Issue 12, 1137 (2018)
Huihui Lu1、2、†, Zhongmin Wang1、2、†, Zhijin Huang1、2, Jun Tao1、2, Hanqing Xiong1、2, Wentao Qiu1、2、3、*, Heyuan Guan1、2、4、*, Huazhuo Dong1、2, Jiangli Dong1、2, Wenguo Zhu1、2, Jianhui Yu1、2, Yongchun Zhong1、2, Yunhan Luo1、2, Jun Zhang1、2, and Zhe Chen1、2
Author Affiliations
  • 1Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Optical Fiber Sensing and Communications, Department of Optoelectronic Engineering, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, China
  • 2Key Laboratory of Optoelectronic Information and Sensing Technologies of Guangdong Higher Education Institutes, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, China
  • 3e-mail: qiuwentao@jnu.edu.cn
  • 4e-mail: ttguanheyuan@jnu.edu.cn
  • show less
    DOI: 10.1364/PRJ.6.001137 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Huihui Lu, Zhongmin Wang, Zhijin Huang, Jun Tao, Hanqing Xiong, Wentao Qiu, Heyuan Guan, Huazhuo Dong, Jiangli Dong, Wenguo Zhu, Jianhui Yu, Yongchun Zhong, Yunhan Luo, Jun Zhang, Zhe Chen. Resonance-assisted light–control–light characteristics of SnS2 on a microfiber knot resonator with fast response[J]. Photonics Research, 2018, 6(12): 1137 Copy Citation Text show less
    (a) Microscopic images of the MKR with a loop diameter of D≈480.6 μm, and the inset shows the waist region of the MF with a diameter of d≈7.0 μm. (b) Transmission of the MKR structure where the largest obtained ER is ∼18.0 dB at a resonance wavelength around 1542.3 nm.
    Fig. 1. (a) Microscopic images of the MKR with a loop diameter of D480.6  μm, and the inset shows the waist region of the MF with a diameter of d7.0  μm. (b) Transmission of the MKR structure where the largest obtained ER is 18.0  dB at a resonance wavelength around 1542.3 nm.
    (a) Raman spectrum of the SnS2 nanosheets. (b) Absorption spectrum of the SnS2 nanosheets.
    Fig. 2. (a) Raman spectrum of the SnS2 nanosheets. (b) Absorption spectrum of the SnS2 nanosheets.
    (a) Microscopic image of the MKR coated with SnS2 nanosheets. (b) SEM image of the MKR coated with SnS2.
    Fig. 3. (a) Microscopic image of the MKR coated with SnS2 nanosheets. (b) SEM image of the MKR coated with SnS2.
    Experimental setup for light amplitude tuning by violet pump light power.
    Fig. 4. Experimental setup for light amplitude tuning by violet pump light power.
    (a) Transmission recorded from the MKR without SnS2 (red curve) and the MKR with SnS2 (green curve). The purple ellipse shows one minor resonance in the MKR without SnS2. (b) Measured normalized transmission spectrum of the MKR without SnS2 (red curve) and the corresponding fitted resonance curve (black circles). The fitted curve is obtained by setting γ=0.033, κr=0.298, and Re(neff)=1.47.
    Fig. 5. (a) Transmission recorded from the MKR without SnS2 (red curve) and the MKR with SnS2 (green curve). The purple ellipse shows one minor resonance in the MKR without SnS2. (b) Measured normalized transmission spectrum of the MKR without SnS2 (red curve) and the corresponding fitted resonance curve (black circles). The fitted curve is obtained by setting γ=0.033, κr=0.298, and Re(neff)=1.47.
    (a) Measured normalized transmission spectra of the MKR with SnS2 (green curve) and the corresponding fitted resonance curve (black circles). The fitted curve is obtained by setting γ=0.673, κr=0.217, and Re(neff)=1.42. (b) Transmission of the MKR structure at different external violet pump light powers. The red, black, brown, cyan, and blue curves correspond to the transmission with external violet pump power of 0, 5.1, 10, 15.3, and 20.2 mW, respectively.
    Fig. 6. (a) Measured normalized transmission spectra of the MKR with SnS2 (green curve) and the corresponding fitted resonance curve (black circles). The fitted curve is obtained by setting γ=0.673, κr=0.217, and Re(neff)=1.42. (b) Transmission of the MKR structure at different external violet pump light powers. The red, black, brown, cyan, and blue curves correspond to the transmission with external violet pump power of 0, 5.1, 10, 15.3, and 20.2 mW, respectively.
    Transmission spectrum of the MKR with SnS2 under different violet pump power excitation within a wavelength range of (a) 1532 nm to 1545 nm, while the two modes highlighted with red ellipses are around 1533 nm and 1544.7 nm, and (b) 1563 nm to 1570 nm, while the two modes highlighted with red ellipses are around 1564 nm and 1569.6 nm.
    Fig. 7. Transmission spectrum of the MKR with SnS2 under different violet pump power excitation within a wavelength range of (a) 1532 nm to 1545 nm, while the two modes highlighted with red ellipses are around 1533 nm and 1544.7 nm, and (b) 1563 nm to 1570 nm, while the two modes highlighted with red ellipses are around 1564 nm and 1569.6 nm.
    Linear fit of ΔT versus violet light power for four different resonances at λres=1533 nm (red curve with a correlation coefficient of 93.8%), λres=1544.7 nm (black curve with a correlation coefficient of 98.4%), λres=1564 nm (blue curve with a correlation coefficient of 98.4%), and λres=1569.6 nm (pink curve with a correlation coefficient of 99.5%).
    Fig. 8. Linear fit of ΔT versus violet light power for four different resonances at λres=1533  nm (red curve with a correlation coefficient of 93.8%), λres=1544.7  nm (black curve with a correlation coefficient of 98.4%), λres=1564  nm (blue curve with a correlation coefficient of 98.4%), and λres=1569.6  nm (pink curve with a correlation coefficient of 99.5%).
    (a) Experimental setup for device response time measurement. (b) Response time of the device at a probe wavelength of 1548 nm with a violet light power of 2.3, 4.4, and 6.3 mW.
    Fig. 9. (a) Experimental setup for device response time measurement. (b) Response time of the device at a probe wavelength of 1548 nm with a violet light power of 2.3, 4.4, and 6.3 mW.
    Structureλres (nm)ERmax (dB)QFSR (nm)
    MKR without SnS21542.318.0405861.07
    MKR with SnS21544.726.6594151.11
    Table 1. Resonance Properties of Structures in the MKR with and without SnS2
    λres (nm)QERΔT at 20.2 mW (dB)ΔTViolet Power(dB/mW)
    153319153.71.00.053
    1544.75941526.64.50.22
    156420164.21.10.053
    1569.62065219.23.70.177
    Table 2. Properties and the Obtained ΔT Variation Rate Associated with the Four Highlighted Resonances in Fig. 7
    Type of StructureSensitivity (dB/mW)Response Time
    MKR with liquid crystals [35]0.15 at 25°C5 s
    MKR with graphene [3]0.02
    MF with MoSe2 [36]0.1650.6 s
    MF with graphene [37]0.2
    MF with bilayer graphene [38]0.0071×106  s
    SnS2 + MKR (this paper)0.223.2×103  s
    Table 3. Performances Comparison of Different Light–Control–Light Structures
    Huihui Lu, Zhongmin Wang, Zhijin Huang, Jun Tao, Hanqing Xiong, Wentao Qiu, Heyuan Guan, Huazhuo Dong, Jiangli Dong, Wenguo Zhu, Jianhui Yu, Yongchun Zhong, Yunhan Luo, Jun Zhang, Zhe Chen. Resonance-assisted light–control–light characteristics of SnS2 on a microfiber knot resonator with fast response[J]. Photonics Research, 2018, 6(12): 1137
    Download Citation