• Acta Photonica Sinica
  • Vol. 49, Issue 1, 0128001 (2020)
Yu WANG1、2 and Wei-jiao JIANG3
Author Affiliations
  • 1Xi'an Research Institute of Surveying and Mapping, Xi'an 710054, China
  • 2State Key Laboratory of Geo-information Engineering, Xi'an 710054, China
  • 3School of Communication Engineering, Xidian University, Xi'an 710071, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/gzxb20204901.0128001 Cite this Article
    Yu WANG, Wei-jiao JIANG. High Precision Attitude Determination Method for Star Camera Based on UKF[J]. Acta Photonica Sinica, 2020, 49(1): 0128001 Copy Citation Text show less
    基于UKF的恒星相机和陀螺联合定姿算法流程The diagram of attitude determination algorithm for star camera and gyroscope based on UKF
    Fig. 1. 基于UKF的恒星相机和陀螺联合定姿算法流程The diagram of attitude determination algorithm for star camera and gyroscope based on UKF
    Pitch angle results of experiment
    Fig. 2. Pitch angle results of experiment
    Roll angle results of experiment 3
    Fig. 3. Roll angle results of experiment 3
    Yaw angle results of experiment 3
    Fig. 4. Yaw angle results of experiment 3
    Pitch angle comparison of UKF
    Fig. 5. Pitch angle comparison of UKF
    Roll angle comparison of UKF
    Fig. 6. Roll angle comparison of UKF
    Yaw angle comparison of UKF
    Fig. 7. Yaw angle comparison of UKF
    Equatorial radius of the earth/mSemi-major axis of satellite orbit/mInclination angle of satellite orbit/(°) Right ascension of ascending nodeRight ascension rate of ascending nodeOptical axis angle of star camera/(°) Optical axis direction vector of star camera
    6 371 0006 863 96397.371 6rad(140 000)0.000 1114.9(0.8, 0.5, -0.1) (-0.8, 0.5, -0.1)
    Table 1. Simulative data parameters of star camera and gyroscope
    NumberStar camera parametersGyroscope parameters
    Error/(″)Frequency/HzError/(″)Frequency/Hz
    1550.2~2.410
    2250.2~2.410
    3150.2~2.410
    Table 2. Explanation of simulative experiments
    Gyroscope error(″/s)Attitude precision of EKF(″/3σ)Attitude precision of UKF(″/3σ)
    PitchRollYawPitchRollYaw
    0.20.720.430.390.670.420.37
    0.40.750.520.470.730.470.43
    0.60.820.640.600.790.580.56
    0.80.940.770.740.850.660.63
    1.01.030.890.900.940.800.77
    1.21.171.081.031.060.920.88
    1.41.341.181.201.131.021.01
    1.61.481.371.291.281.211.12
    1.81.621.551.481.411.271.31
    2.01.741.641.671.561.370 81.36
    2.21.951.771.811.681.570 71.58
    2.41.952.012.121.721.699 11.67
    Table 3. Results of simulative experiment 1
    Gyroscope error(″/s)Attitude precision of EKF(″/3σ)Attitude precision of UKF(″/3σ)
    PitchRollYawPitchRollYaw
    0.20.350.240.210.400.260.22
    0.40.410.300.280.430.300.26
    0.60.450.400.390.450.350.32
    0.80.560.490.470.520.420.40
    1.00.640.610.610.580.500.47
    1.20.760.720.650.630.580.56
    1.40.840.800.790.710.660.63
    1.60.950.920.920.760.730.72
    1.81.051.051.010.850.810.80
    2.01.161.151.100.920.880.88
    2.21.301.261.331.010.950.94
    2.41.341.361.421.121.021.01
    Table 4. Results of simulative experiment 2
    Gyroscope error(″/s)Attitude precision of EKF(″/3σ)Attitude precision of UKF(″/3σ)
    PitchRollYawPitchRollYaw
    0.20.240.160.140.280.190.16
    0.40.270.210.190.300.220.19
    0.60.330.270.270.340.250.24
    0.80.390.360.350.360.300.28
    1.00.480.410.420.410.340.32
    1.20.550.520.500.450.390.38
    1.40.600.600.570.510.450.44
    1.60.700.690.670.540.510.50
    1.80.760.750.750.610.560.55
    2.00.840.820.790.640.610.60
    2.20.970.910.930.700.660.66
    2.41.011.011.010.760.730.73
    Table 5. Results of simulative experiment 3
    Yu WANG, Wei-jiao JIANG. High Precision Attitude Determination Method for Star Camera Based on UKF[J]. Acta Photonica Sinica, 2020, 49(1): 0128001
    Download Citation