• Acta Photonica Sinica
  • Vol. 53, Issue 8, 0806002 (2024)
Cui ZHANG1, Rui LUO2, Yinjie ZHANG2, Sikai JIA2, and Weibing GAN1,*
Author Affiliations
  • 1National Engineering Research Center of Fiber Optic Sensing Technology and Networks, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China
  • 2School of Information Engineering, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/gzxb20245308.0806002 Cite this Article
    Cui ZHANG, Rui LUO, Yinjie ZHANG, Sikai JIA, Weibing GAN. Fourier Series Based Grating Wavelength Signal Reconstruction and Accurate Vibration Displacement Measurement[J]. Acta Photonica Sinica, 2024, 53(8): 0806002 Copy Citation Text show less
    Vibration test systems
    Fig. 1. Vibration test systems
    Sensitivity fitting curve
    Fig. 2. Sensitivity fitting curve
    Comparison of wavelength offsets reconstructed using FSWCM with wavelength offsets of the original grating
    Fig. 3. Comparison of wavelength offsets reconstructed using FSWCM with wavelength offsets of the original grating
    Comparison of FSWCM and MFWCM results for vibration acceleration and vibration displacement
    Fig. 4. Comparison of FSWCM and MFWCM results for vibration acceleration and vibration displacement
    Comparison of wavelength offsets between FSWCM reconstructed gratings and original gratings for dual-frequency vibrational excitation
    Fig. 5. Comparison of wavelength offsets between FSWCM reconstructed gratings and original gratings for dual-frequency vibrational excitation
    Spectrogram of FSWCM-reconstructed grating wavelength offsets versus original grating wavelength offsets under dual-frequency vibration excitation
    Fig. 6. Spectrogram of FSWCM-reconstructed grating wavelength offsets versus original grating wavelength offsets under dual-frequency vibration excitation
    The time-domain response of vibration acceleration of FSWCM and MFWCM under dual frequency vibration excitation
    Fig. 7. The time-domain response of vibration acceleration of FSWCM and MFWCM under dual frequency vibration excitation
    The time-domain response of vibration displacement of FSWCM and MFWCM under dual frequency vibration excitation
    Fig. 8. The time-domain response of vibration displacement of FSWCM and MFWCM under dual frequency vibration excitation
    Fiber Bragg grating accelerometer and electrical sensor installation diagram
    Fig. 9. Fiber Bragg grating accelerometer and electrical sensor installation diagram
    Comparison of the wavelength offset of the FSWCM reconstructed grating with the wavelength offset of the original grating for the upper rack Y
    Fig. 10. Comparison of the wavelength offset of the FSWCM reconstructed grating with the wavelength offset of the original grating for the upper rack Y
    Spectrogram of FSWCM reconstructed grating wavelength offsets versus original grating wavelength offsets for the upper rack Y
    Fig. 11. Spectrogram of FSWCM reconstructed grating wavelength offsets versus original grating wavelength offsets for the upper rack Y
    Time domain response of FSWCM and MFWCM vibration acceleration of upper rack Y
    Fig. 12. Time domain response of FSWCM and MFWCM vibration acceleration of upper rack Y
    Time domain response of FSWCM and MFWCM vibration displacement of upper rack Y
    Fig. 13. Time domain response of FSWCM and MFWCM vibration displacement of upper rack Y
    Comparison of upper rack Y and stator end data
    Fig. 14. Comparison of upper rack Y and stator end data
    FrequencyFSWCMMFWCMTheoreticalFSWCM errorMFWCM error
    60 Hz5.874 m/s25.724 m/s26 m/s2-2.10%-4.60%
    100 Hz5.916 m/s25.841 m/s26 m/s2-1.40%-2.65%
    150 Hz6.041 m/s25.973 m/s6 m/s20.68%-0.45%
    Table 1. Comparison of vibration acceleration calculation results between FSWCM and MFWCM
    FrequencyFSWCMMFWCMTheoreticalFSWCM errorMFWCM error
    60 Hz43.793 μm40.274 μm42.216 μm3.74%-4.60%
    100 Hz15.086 μm14.796 μm15.198 μm-0.74%-2.65%
    150 Hz6.795 μm6.725 μm6.754 μm0.61%-0.43%
    Table 2. Comparison of vibration displacement calculation results between FSWCM and MFWCM
    Frequency1Frequency2Acceleration1Acceleration2Phase difference
    20 Hz60 Hz2.461 m/s24.271 m/s21.788π
    60 Hz100 Hz3.253 m/s22.8 m/s21.788π
    60 Hz250 Hz2.39 m/s21.655 m/s21.788π
    100 Hz250 Hz2.828 m/s22.263 m/s21.788π
    Table 3. Dual-frequency vibration excitation parameters
    FrequencyFSWCMMFWCMTheoreticalFSWCM errorMFWCM error
    20 Hz, 60 Hz307.199 μm78.042 μm303.079 μm1.36%-74.25%
    60 Hz, 100 Hz54.384 μm75.834 μm59.402 μm-8.45%27.66%
    60 Hz, 250 Hz36.074 μm40.125 μm34.927 μm3.28%14.88%
    100 Hz, 250 Hz16.388 μm16.797 μm15.720 μm4.25%6.85%
    Table 4. Comparison of peak-to-peak vibration displacements for FSWCM and MFWCM
    Cui ZHANG, Rui LUO, Yinjie ZHANG, Sikai JIA, Weibing GAN. Fourier Series Based Grating Wavelength Signal Reconstruction and Accurate Vibration Displacement Measurement[J]. Acta Photonica Sinica, 2024, 53(8): 0806002
    Download Citation