• Journal of Atmospheric and Environmental Optics
  • Vol. 20, Issue 1, 18 (2025)
DENG Xueliang1,*, ZHU Song1, HE Dongyan2, SHEN Weiwei1..., LU Dachun3, DAI Rui1, JIN Xiaolong1 and XU Qianqian1|Show fewer author(s)
Author Affiliations
  • 1Hefei Meteorological Bureau, Hefei 230041, China
  • 2Anhui Climate Center, Hefei 230031, China
  • 3Meteorological Observation Technology Support Centre of Anhui, Hefei 230031, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-6141.2025.01.002 Cite this Article
    Xueliang DENG, Song ZHU, Dongyan HE, Weiwei SHEN, Dachun LU, Rui DAI, Xiaolong JIN, Qianqian XU. Comparison of vertical profiles between ERA5 reanalysis data and balloon radiosondes data in Anhui, China[J]. Journal of Atmospheric and Environmental Optics, 2025, 20(1): 18 Copy Citation Text show less
    Location of balloon radiosondes stations and ground remote sensing stations in Anhui
    Fig. 1. Location of balloon radiosondes stations and ground remote sensing stations in Anhui
    Comparison of horizontal wind fields between radiosonde data and ERA5 data in Fuyang and Anqing from 2018 to 2021. (a) Scatter; (b) bias; (c) absolute relative error
    Fig. 2. Comparison of horizontal wind fields between radiosonde data and ERA5 data in Fuyang and Anqing from 2018 to 2021. (a) Scatter; (b) bias; (c) absolute relative error
    Comparison of vertical wind field between radiosonde data and ERA5 data in Fuyang from 2018 to 2021. (a) Correlation coefficients; (b) bias; (c) RMSE
    Fig. 3. Comparison of vertical wind field between radiosonde data and ERA5 data in Fuyang from 2018 to 2021. (a) Correlation coefficients; (b) bias; (c) RMSE
    Vertical statistical parameters of wind field between radiosonde data and ERA5 data from 2018 to 2021 in Anqing. (a) Correlation coefficients; (b) bias; (c) RMSE
    Fig. 4. Vertical statistical parameters of wind field between radiosonde data and ERA5 data from 2018 to 2021 in Anqing. (a) Correlation coefficients; (b) bias; (c) RMSE
    Proportional distribution of absolute relative error of wind field in ERA5 reanalysis data compared with radiosonde data at each altitude in Fuyang and Anqing from 2018 to 2021. (a) u in Fuyang; (b) v in Fuyang; (c) u in Anqing; (d) v in Anqing
    Fig. 5. Proportional distribution of absolute relative error of wind field in ERA5 reanalysis data compared with radiosonde data at each altitude in Fuyang and Anqing from 2018 to 2021. (a) u in Fuyang; (b) v in Fuyang; (c) u in Anqing; (d) v in Anqing
    Comparison of temperature and relative humidity in horizontal direction between radiosonde data and ERA5 data in Fuyang and Anqing from 2018 to 2021. (a) Scatter; (b) bias; (c) absolute relative error
    Fig. 6. Comparison of temperature and relative humidity in horizontal direction between radiosonde data and ERA5 data in Fuyang and Anqing from 2018 to 2021. (a) Scatter; (b) bias; (c) absolute relative error
    Comparison of temperature and relative humidity in vertical direction between radiosonde data and ERA5 data in Fuyang from 2018 to 2021. (a) Correlation coefficients; (b) bias; (c) RMSE
    Fig. 7. Comparison of temperature and relative humidity in vertical direction between radiosonde data and ERA5 data in Fuyang from 2018 to 2021. (a) Correlation coefficients; (b) bias; (c) RMSE
    Comparison of temperature and relative humidity in vertical direction between radiosonde data and ERA5 data in Anqing from 2018 to 2021. (a) Correlation coefficients; (b) bias; (c) RMSE
    Fig. 8. Comparison of temperature and relative humidity in vertical direction between radiosonde data and ERA5 data in Anqing from 2018 to 2021. (a) Correlation coefficients; (b) bias; (c) RMSE
    Proportional distribution of absolute relative error of T and HR in ERA5 reanalysis data compared with radiosonde data at each altitude in Fuyang and Anqing from 2018 to 2021. (a) T in Fuyang; (b) HR in Fuyang; (c) T in Anqing; (d) HR in Anqing
    Fig. 9. Proportional distribution of absolute relative error of T and HR in ERA5 reanalysis data compared with radiosonde data at each altitude in Fuyang and Anqing from 2018 to 2021. (a) T in Fuyang; (b) HR in Fuyang; (c) T in Anqing; (d) HR in Anqing
    ParametersSpecification
    Horizontal resolution0.25° × 0.25°
    Vertical resolution37 pressure levels
    Time resolution/h1
    Main variablesu, v, T, HR
    Height coverage/hPa1–1000
    Time frame2018-01–2021-12
    Table 1. ERA5 reanalysis data description
    天气

    高度

    /km

    CCsBias/(m·s-1)RMSE/(m·s-1)
    u(阜阳)u(安庆)v(阜阳)v(安庆)u(阜阳)u(安庆)v(阜阳)v(安庆)u(阜阳)u(安庆)v(阜阳)v(安庆)
    所有天0–60.980.980.960.950.01-0.05-0.11-0.051.581.681.571.68
    0–20.960.950.950.950.07-0.040.02-0.091.521.581.471.69
    2–40.970.970.960.95-0.04-0.01-0.2-0.031.61.721.631.62
    4–60.970.980.960.96-0.07-0.13-0.370.041.731.871.811.79
    非降水日0–60.980.980.960.960.020-0.11-0.041.471.471.461.50
    0–20.960.950.960.950.10-0.010.03-0.051.421.431.361.52
    2–40.970.970.960.96-0.050.04-0.2-0.061.481.471.511.44
    4–60.980.980.960.97-0.09-0.06-0.370.041.611.61.661.55
    降水日0–60.970.970.950.94-0.01-0.12-0.12-0.071.851.941.861.93
    0–20.950.950.950.940-0.090-0.141.761.791.731.92
    2–40.960.960.950.93-0.02-0.1-0.210.011.92.041.921.88
    4–60.970.970.940.93-0.02-0.24-0.380.042.032.232.182.09
    Table 2. The CCs, bias and RMSE of the zonal wind u and meridional wind v components of ERA5 and radiosonde data at Fuyang and Anqing stations under different height and weather conditions
    天气高度/kmCCsBiasRMSE

    T

    (阜阳)

    T

    (安庆)

    HR

    (阜阳)

    HR

    (安庆)

    T/ºC

    (阜阳)

    T/ºC

    (安庆)

    HR/%

    (阜阳)

    HR/%

    (安庆)

    T/ºC

    (阜阳)

    T/ºC

    (安庆)

    HR/%

    (阜阳)

    HR/%

    (安庆)

    所有天0–61.001.000.930.94-0.13-0.092.510.240.990.7911.7111.01
    0–21.001.000.920.93-0.11-0.022.28-0.490.730.7410.909.91
    2–40.990.990.930.94-0.12-0.142.330.771.280.8112.1111.74
    4–60.990.990.920.93-0.24-0.203.761.751.030.9313.5512.96
    非降水日0–61.001.000.910.92-0.17-0.142.860.610.800.7611.7711.27
    0–21.001.000.910.91-0.12-0.072.76-0.060.710.7111.1110.38
    2–40.990.990.910.92-0.19-0.192.600.890.830.7712.2312.17
    4–60.990.990.920.92-0.30-0.303.832.391.030.8912.9812.16
    降水日0–60.991.000.890.90-0.0201.51-0.341.380.8511.5310.59
    0–21.001.000.870.87-0.060.050.93-1.150.790.7910.309.16
    2–40.960.990.910.910.07-0.061.560.562.120.8711.7310.98
    4–60.990.980.890.89-0.07-0.033.570.751.031.0015.0014.10
    Table 3. The CCs, Bias,and RMSE of temperature T and relative humidity HR of ERA5 and radiosondes data at Fuyang and Anqing stations under different height and weather conditions
    Xueliang DENG, Song ZHU, Dongyan HE, Weiwei SHEN, Dachun LU, Rui DAI, Xiaolong JIN, Qianqian XU. Comparison of vertical profiles between ERA5 reanalysis data and balloon radiosondes data in Anhui, China[J]. Journal of Atmospheric and Environmental Optics, 2025, 20(1): 18
    Download Citation