• Chinese Journal of Lasers
  • Vol. 51, Issue 5, 0510005 (2024)
Chengli Ji1、2, Zhenyi Chen3、*, Yifeng Huang3, Jiajia Mao1, Zhicheng Wang1, Ruichang Gu4, Aiming Liu4, Chunsheng Zhang4, and Yan Xiang5
Author Affiliations
  • 1CMA Meteorological Observation Centre, Beijing 100081, China
  • 2CMA Meteorological Observation Engineering Technology Research Center,Beijing 100081, China
  • 3School of Light Industry Science and Engineering, Beijing Technology and Business University, Beijing 100048, China
  • 4Shenzhen National Climate Observatory, Shenzhen 518040, Guangdong, China
  • 5Institute of Physical Science and Information Technology, Anhui University, Hefei 230601, Anhui, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/CJL231280 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Chengli Ji, Zhenyi Chen, Yifeng Huang, Jiajia Mao, Zhicheng Wang, Ruichang Gu, Aiming Liu, Chunsheng Zhang, Yan Xiang. Aerosol Mass Concentration Retrieval Algorithm Based on LiDAR and Microwave Radiometry[J]. Chinese Journal of Lasers, 2024, 51(5): 0510005 Copy Citation Text show less

    Abstract

    Objective

    The technology for retrieving aerosol extinction coefficients from LiDAR is mature. However, further progress is required to retrieve the vertical distribution of aerosol mass concentration. In addition, accuracy evaluation of aerosol mass concentration from LiDAR is challenging owing to the lack of standard vertical PM2.5 mass concentration. Therefore, in this study, a PM2.5 mass concentration retrieval algorithm was developed by integrating real-time temperature, relative humidity, and extinction coefficient profiles. The PM2.5 mass concentration at four heights of the Shenzhen Meteorological Gradient Observation Tower was used as the standard value to evaluate the accuracy of the model under different weather conditions and seasons.

    Methods

    The influence of meteorological factors on the vertical distribution of aerosol mass concentration is extremely complex, particularly under precipitation conditions where the LiDAR signal attenuation is severe. Therefore, in this study, only the effects of temperature and relative humidity on the vertical distribution of aerosols under non-precipitation weather conditions were investigated. In practical applications, sample data are initially preprocessed, including the outlier handling (triple standard deviation removal), rainy day data, and missing value removal. The extinction coefficient at the lowest height of the LiDAR, ground temperature, relative humidity from the microwave radiometer, and PM2.5 mass concentration near the ground were substituted into an exponential model. The data from 2500 h were subsequently used for model fitting. The model parameters were automatically determined based on the minimum mean square error. Thus, the extinction coefficient, temperature, and relative humidity profiles at a specific height could be selected to calculate the PM2.5 mass concentration at the corresponding height. To investigate the accuracy of the PM2.5 mass concentration inversion, comparisons were conducted between PM2.5 mass concentrations at four heights (70, 120, 220, and 335 m) on the Shenzhen Meteorological Gradient Observation Tower.

    Results and Discussions

    By comparing different weather conditions, the correlation coefficients between the simulated and measured values at the four heights are over 0.68 (Figs.3 and 4). The maximum mean absolute error (MAE) and root mean square error (RMSE) are 6.88 μg/m3 and 18.56 μg/m3, respectively, appearing at a height of 335 m on sunny days. In different seasons, the correlation coefficients at the four heights range from 0.78?0.93, 0.71?0.81, 0.73?0.80, and 0.63?0.75, respectively (Table 4). The PM2.5 mass concentration spatiotemporal distribution and transport process on July 29, 2022, was selected as a case study for analysis (Fig.6). Before 08:00, the aerosol extinction coefficient within 1 km of the boundary layer is relatively low (<0.3 km-1), and the PM2.5 mass concentration, and extinction coefficient decreased with increasing altitude. However, the decrease in gradient was insignificant. This is because the PM2.5 mass concentration mixed unevenly with altitude changes owing to stable stratification on that day. Moreover, relatively weak winds are not conducive to diffusion. Under high temperature and relative humidity conditions, the hygroscopicity of aerosols at high altitudes increases. Thus, the averaged extinction coefficient over 0.48 km is greater than 0.5 km-1, and high PM2.5 mass concentration (40 μg/m3) is observed simultaneously. This indicates that atmospheric aerosol vertical distribution is significantly influenced by temperature and relative humidity. In addition, the vertical distribution of aerosols is fully reflected in the height variation of PM2.5 mass concentration, which provides an analytical tool for examining the vertical distribution of aerosol microscopic physical characteristics.

    Conclusions

    This study established a multivariate PM2.5 mass concentration fitting model based on an exponential model combining temperature, relative humidity, and extinction profiles. The optimal parameters were selected based on the minimum mean-square deviation index, and the output was validated. Compared to the linear and exponential basic models, the accuracy of the multivariate fitting model has been improved, with correlation coefficients at all four heights above 0.80. The minimum MAE and RMSE are approximately 4 μg/m3 and 7 μg/m3, respectively. Under clear and cloudy weather conditions, the correlation coefficients at four altitudes exceed 0.68, and the MAE and RMSE are below 7 μg/m3 and 19 μg/m3,respectively. The simulation results spanning different seasons demonstrate that the average mass concentration of PM2.5 in Shenzhen is below 35 μg/m3. The simulated PM2.5 mass concentration exhibited seasonal variation patterns. In addition, the simulation results for spring, summer, and autumn are better than those for winter. This may be due to the uncertainty caused by the relatively high aerosol mass concentrations in winter. Considering the uncertainty caused by the LiDAR and microwave radiometer measurement processes, the validation results of the proposed multivariate model performed well within an acceptable range.

    Chengli Ji, Zhenyi Chen, Yifeng Huang, Jiajia Mao, Zhicheng Wang, Ruichang Gu, Aiming Liu, Chunsheng Zhang, Yan Xiang. Aerosol Mass Concentration Retrieval Algorithm Based on LiDAR and Microwave Radiometry[J]. Chinese Journal of Lasers, 2024, 51(5): 0510005
    Download Citation