• Chinese Journal of Lasers
  • Vol. 49, Issue 21, 2106001 (2022)
Ling Qin, Dongxing Wang, Mingquan Shi, Fengying Wang, and Xiaoli Hu*
Author Affiliations
  • School of Information Engineering, Inner Mongolia University of Science and Technology, Baotou 014010, Inner Mongolia, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/CJL202249.2106001 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Ling Qin, Dongxing Wang, Mingquan Shi, Fengying Wang, Xiaoli Hu. Indoor Visible Light Localization System Based on Genetic Algorithm-Optimized Extreme Learning Machine Neural Network[J]. Chinese Journal of Lasers, 2022, 49(21): 2106001 Copy Citation Text show less
    Indoor visible light positioning model
    Fig. 1. Indoor visible light positioning model
    ELM network structure
    Fig. 2. ELM network structure
    Genetic algorithm flow chart
    Fig. 3. Genetic algorithm flow chart
    GA-ELM algorithm flow chart
    Fig. 4. GA-ELM algorithm flow chart
    Indoor three-dimensional localization distribution map
    Fig. 5. Indoor three-dimensional localization distribution map
    Actual coordinates versus system predicted coordinates when receiver is at different altitudes. (a) 0.2 m; (b) 0.4 m; (c) 0.6 m; (d) 0.8 m
    Fig. 6. Actual coordinates versus system predicted coordinates when receiver is at different altitudes. (a) 0.2 m; (b) 0.4 m; (c) 0.6 m; (d) 0.8 m
    Three-dimensional localization error of system when receiver is at different altitudes. (a) 0.2 m; (b) 0.4 m; (c) 0.6 m; (d) 0.8 m
    Fig. 7. Three-dimensional localization error of system when receiver is at different altitudes. (a) 0.2 m; (b) 0.4 m; (c) 0.6 m; (d) 0.8 m
    Localization error cumulative distribution of the system when receiver is at different altitudes
    Fig. 8. Localization error cumulative distribution of the system when receiver is at different altitudes
    Experimental scene and receiving end equipment. (a) Experimental scene; (b) receiving end equipment
    Fig. 9. Experimental scene and receiving end equipment. (a) Experimental scene; (b) receiving end equipment
    Two-dimensional localization results of GA-ELM
    Fig. 10. Two-dimensional localization results of GA-ELM
    Localization error histogram
    Fig. 11. Localization error histogram
    Cumulative distribution of localization error of GA-ELM and ELM algorithms
    Fig. 12. Cumulative distribution of localization error of GA-ELM and ELM algorithms
    Cumulative distribution of localization error of four algorithms
    Fig. 13. Cumulative distribution of localization error of four algorithms
    The number of LEDMax localization error /cmAverage localization error /cmLocalization time /s
    399.49010.35000.0315
    43.9120.94180.0413
    64.6400.95000.0874
    Table 1. Simulation results for selecting the number of LED
    ParameterValue
    Light source emission power /W10
    Receiver field of view ψc /(°)90
    Filter gain Ts(ψ)1
    Concentrator gain g(ψ)10
    Effective receiving area of receiver /cm21
    Angle of half-power ϕ1/2/(°)30
    Number of neurons225
    Population size2
    Chromosome length1300
    Maximum number of iteration200
    Crossover probability0.7
    Mutation probability0.01
    Table 2. Simulation parameters
    Data setAverage localization error /cmLocalization time /s
    11×1174.68000.00215
    21×210.92140.04235
    41×410.91380.10940
    Table 3. Simulation results for different training data sets
    No.Maximum localization error /cm
    GA-ELMELM
    14.109.76
    25.5122.21
    34.6813.25
    45.2710.63
    55.1012.42
    64.5012.22
    74.3211.88
    85.7816.29
    93.7215.13
    105.8213.60
    Average value /cm4.8813.34
    Standard deviation /cm0.723.55
    Table 4. Maximum localization error for random 10 estimation results
    Localization algorithmMax localization error /cmAverage localization error /cm
    GA-ELM3.91920.9214
    GA-BP15.333.72
    SVM19.513.74
    BP60.1821.04
    Table 5. Comparison of localization errors of different algorithms
    Localization algorithmAverage localization time /s
    GA-ELM0.04235
    GA-BP0.09237
    SVM0.09165
    BP0.09301
    Table 6. Comparison of localization timeliness of different algorithms
    Ling Qin, Dongxing Wang, Mingquan Shi, Fengying Wang, Xiaoli Hu. Indoor Visible Light Localization System Based on Genetic Algorithm-Optimized Extreme Learning Machine Neural Network[J]. Chinese Journal of Lasers, 2022, 49(21): 2106001
    Download Citation