• Acta Photonica Sinica
  • Vol. 51, Issue 4, 0416001 (2022)
Zemei PAN1, Qiuping ZHANG1、2、*, Man SONG1, Huan YUAN1, Yutong LIU3, Yuanjie SU2, and Ming XU1、*
Author Affiliations
  • 1College of Electronic Information & Key Lab of Information Materials of Sichuan Province,Southwest Minzu University,Chengdu 610041,China
  • 2State Key Laboratory of Electronic Thin Films and Integrated Devices,School of Optoelectronic Science and;Engineering,University of Electronic Science and Technology of China,Chengdu 610054,China
  • 3Laboratory of Superconductivity and Material Applications,College of Physics and Energy,Fujian Normal University,Fuzhou 350117,China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/gzxb20225104.0416001 Cite this Article
    Zemei PAN, Qiuping ZHANG, Man SONG, Huan YUAN, Yutong LIU, Yuanjie SU, Ming XU. Facile Synthesis of ZnO/TiO2 Nanocomposite Photocatalysts and Study of Their Photocatalytic Performance[J]. Acta Photonica Sinica, 2022, 51(4): 0416001 Copy Citation Text show less
    Photodegradation curves of MB and MO of pure ZnO,commercial TiO2 and ZnO/TiO2 nanocomposites under simulated light(The inset is the fitting of the pseudo-first-order kinetic function)
    Fig. 1. Photodegradation curves of MB and MO of pure ZnO,commercial TiO2 and ZnO/TiO2 nanocomposites under simulated light(The inset is the fitting of the pseudo-first-order kinetic function)
    XRD spectra of pure ZnO,commercial TiO2 and ZnO/TiO2 nanocomposites samples
    Fig. 2. XRD spectra of pure ZnO,commercial TiO2 and ZnO/TiO2 nanocomposites samples
    High-resolution TEM images and SAED images of sample ZT0.002 and ZT0.5
    Fig. 3. High-resolution TEM images and SAED images of sample ZT0.002 and ZT0.5
    SEM images of samples
    Fig. 4. SEM images of samples
    The particle size distribution
    Fig. 5. The particle size distribution
    XPS spectra of samples
    Fig. 6. XPS spectra of samples
    The oxygen content ratio diagram of samples
    Fig. 7. The oxygen content ratio diagram of samples
    Energy paramagnetic resonance spectra of the samples at room temperature
    Fig. 8. Energy paramagnetic resonance spectra of the samples at room temperature
    UV-vis absorption spectra of samples
    Fig. 9. UV-vis absorption spectra of samples
    The surface photovoltage spectra of samples
    Fig. 10. The surface photovoltage spectra of samples
    Effect of different scavengers on the photocatalytic degradation of MB and MO over ZT0.002
    Fig. 11. Effect of different scavengers on the photocatalytic degradation of MB and MO over ZT0.002
    Photocatalytic schematic
    Fig. 12. Photocatalytic schematic
    The efficiency curves of MB,MO degradation of ZT0.002 sample under simulated sunlight in different
    Fig. 13. The efficiency curves of MB,MO degradation of ZT0.002 sample under simulated sunlight in different
    SamplesTiZnTi/(Ti+Zn)
    Weight percentage/wt%Weight percentage/wt%Mole percentage/(mol·mol-1
    ZT0.0020.1366.920.26
    ZT0.021.0465.452.11
    ZT0.15.2059.2310.63
    ZT0.2511.5656.1121.81
    ZT0.511.8431.2133.94
    Table 1. The weight percentages of elements Ti and Zn and mole percentages of Ti/(Ti+Zn)in the samples ZT0.002,ZT0.02,ZT0.1,ZT0.25,ZT0.5
    SampleOrganic pollutantLinear fitting equationApparent chemical reaction rate constantLinearly dependent coefficient R
    ZnOMBy=0.029 47x+0.009 10.029 470.993 97
    MOy=0.037 38x-0.050 440.037 380.996 96
    TiO2MBy=0.153 02x+0.841 020.153 020.942 33
    MOy=0.034 54x-0.139 140.034 540.991 49
    ZT0.002MBy=0.388 3x+0.085 030.038 830.999 21
    MOy=0.047 73x-0.228 420.047 730.988 52
    ZT0.02MBy=0.034 93x+0.004 140.034 930.999 91
    MOy=0.039 95x-0.146 50.039 950.987 56
    ZT0.1MBy=0.032 67x+0.008 910.032 670.999 71
    MOy=0.026 98x-0.020 110.026 980.980 09
    ZT0.25MBy=0.043 78x-0.024 020.043 780.999 44
    MOy=0.028 29x-0.048 490.028 290.994 72
    ZT0.5MBy=0.042 64x+0.259 680.042 640.998 96
    MOy=0.041 41x-0.112 190.041 410.986 94
    Table 2. The performance parameters of pure ZnO,commercial TiO2 and ZnO/TiO2 nanocomposites degradation of MB and MO under simulated light
    Type of catalystsOrganic pollutantInitial concentrationCatalyst doseLight irradiatedIrradiation timeRemoval efficiencyReferences
    ZnO/TiO2MB4 mg/L0.5 g/LSimulated sunlight80 min93%This work
    MO90 min90%
    ZnO/TiO2MB5 mg/L1.5 g/LUV,λmax=365 nm60 min100%3
    MO20 mg/L50 g/L90 min99%
    Cu2O/ZnOMO10 mmol/L--Visible light5 h90%7
    ZnO/TiO2MB0.01 mmol/L--Simulated sunlight180 min100%16
    CuO/TiO2MB5 mg/L--Simulated sunlight60 min40%17
    NiO/TiO2MO10 mg/L1.43 g/LUV,λmax=253.7 nm1 h87.3%18
    Visible light95.6%
    TiO2/Fe2O3MB0.01 mmol/L1 g/LUV5 h95.2%26
    Visible light2 h96%
    CdS/TiO2MO5 mg/L2 g/LSimulated sunlight120 min95.3%27
    ZnO/CdSMB0.01 mmol/L0.25 g/LSunlight120 min100%28
    Table 3. Photodegradation of different semiconductor composite photocatalysts on organic pollutants
    SamplesAverage grain size/nmAverage particle size/nmSpecific surface area/(m2·g-1
    ZnO2563.849.133 2
    TiO237116.789.767 2
    ZT0.0022479.417.276 2
    ZT0.022560.39--
    ZT0.12446.53--
    ZT0.252636.369.470 2
    ZT0.52869.256.742 5
    Table 4. The parameters of pure ZnO,commercial TiO2 and ZnO/TiO2 nanocomposites
    Zemei PAN, Qiuping ZHANG, Man SONG, Huan YUAN, Yutong LIU, Yuanjie SU, Ming XU. Facile Synthesis of ZnO/TiO2 Nanocomposite Photocatalysts and Study of Their Photocatalytic Performance[J]. Acta Photonica Sinica, 2022, 51(4): 0416001
    Download Citation