• Bulletin of the Chinese Ceramic Society
  • Vol. 41, Issue 3, 787 (2022)
LU Yuanjing1、2、*, WEI Yongqi2, ZHOU Shuangxi1, WEI Xing1, YAO Wu2, and YU Lehua1
Author Affiliations
  • 1[in Chinese]
  • 2[in Chinese]
  • show less
    DOI: Cite this Article
    LU Yuanjing, WEI Yongqi, ZHOU Shuangxi, WEI Xing, YAO Wu, YU Lehua. Experimental Study on Fluidity Optimization of 3D Printing Gypsum Powder Based on Response Surface Method[J]. Bulletin of the Chinese Ceramic Society, 2022, 41(3): 787 Copy Citation Text show less
    References

    [1] MACDONALD E, WICKER R. Multiprocess 3D printing for increasing component functionality[J]. Science, 2016, 353(6307): aaf2093.

    [4] INGAGLIO J, FOX J, NAITO C J, et al. Material characteristics of binder jet 3D printed hydrated CSA cement with the addition of fine aggregates[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2019, 206: 494-503.

    [5] FONSECA COELHO A W, DA SILVA MOREIRA THIR R M, ARAUJO A C. Manufacturing of gypsum-sisal fiber composites using binder jetting[J]. Additive Manufacturing, 2019, 29: 100789.

    [6] ZIAEE M, CRANE N B. Binder jetting: a review of process, materials, and methods[J]. Additive Manufacturing, 2019, 28: 781-801.

    [7] SHAKOR P, NEJADI S, PAUL G, et al. Dimensional accuracy, flowability, wettability, and porosity in inkjet 3DP for gypsum and cement mortar materials[J]. Automation in Construction, 2020, 110: 102964.

    [8] CHRIST S, SCHNABEL M, VORNDRAN E, et al. Fiber reinforcement during 3D printing[J]. Materials Letters, 2015, 139: 165-168.

    [9] MA B G, JIANG Q, HUANG J, et al. Effect of different silica particles on flowability of gypsum powder for 3D powder printing[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2019, 217: 394-402.

    [10] ASLAN R, TURAN O. Gypsum-based sound absorber produced by 3D printing technology[J]. Applied Acoustics, 2020, 161: 107162.

    [11] UTELA B, STORTI D, ANDERSON R, et al. A review of process development steps for new material systems in three dimensional printing (3DP)[J]. Journal of Manufacturing Processes, 2008, 10(2): 96-104.

    [12] KHANNIRI E, YOUSEFI M, MORTAZAVIAN A M, et al. Effective removal of lead (Ⅱ) using chitosan and microbial adsorbents: response surface methodology (RSM)[J]. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 2021, 178: 53-62.

    [13] SHAH R B, TAWAKKUL M A, KHAN M A. Comparative evaluation of flow for pharmaceutical powders and granules[J]. AAPS PharmSciTech, 2008, 9(1): 250-258.

    [14] GELDART D, ABDULLAH E C, HASSANPOUR A, et al. Characterization of powder flowability using measurement of angle of repose[J]. China Particuology, 2006, 4(3/4): 104-107.

    [15] GARCIA M A V T, GARCIA C F, FARACO A A G. Pharmaceutical and biomedical applications of native and modified starch: a review[J]. Starch-Strke, 2020, 72(7/8): 1900270.

    [16] KHAN A, DO J, KIM D. Cost effective optimal mix proportioning of high strength self compacting concrete using response surface methodology[J]. Computers and Concrete, 2016, 17(5): 629-638.

    [17] ZHANG Q Y, FENG X J, CHEN X D, et al. Mix design for recycled aggregate pervious concrete based on response surface methodology[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2020, 259: 119776.

    [18] MULLER A K, RUPPEL J, DREXEL C P, et al. Precipitated silica as flow regulator[J]. European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2008, 34(4/5): 303-308.

    LU Yuanjing, WEI Yongqi, ZHOU Shuangxi, WEI Xing, YAO Wu, YU Lehua. Experimental Study on Fluidity Optimization of 3D Printing Gypsum Powder Based on Response Surface Method[J]. Bulletin of the Chinese Ceramic Society, 2022, 41(3): 787
    Download Citation