• Chinese Optics Letters
  • Vol. 17, Issue 9, 091601 (2019)
Xiong Zhou1, Hui Wang1, Haiping Xia1、*, Hongwei Song2、**, Xu Chen2, Jianxu Hu1, and Baojiu Chen3
Author Affiliations
  • 1Key Laboratory of Photo-Electronic Materials, Ningbo University, Ningbo 315211, China
  • 2State Key Laboratory on Integrated Optoelectronics, College of Electronic Science and Engineering and College of Physics, Jilin University, Changchun 130012, China
  • 3Department of Physics, Dalian Maritime University, Dalian 116026, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/COL201917.091601 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Xiong Zhou, Hui Wang, Haiping Xia, Hongwei Song, Xu Chen, Jianxu Hu, Baojiu Chen. Efficient up-conversion Yb3+, Er3+ co-doped Na5Lu9F32 single crystal for photovoltaic application under solar cell spectrum excitation[J]. Chinese Optics Letters, 2019, 17(9): 091601 Copy Citation Text show less

    Abstract

    Yb3+/Er3+ co-doped Na5Lu9F32 single crystals used as a spectral up-converter to improve the power conversion efficiency of perovskite solar cells are prepared via an improved Bridgman approach. Green and red up-conversion (UC) emissions under the excitation of near-infrared (NIR) bands of 900–1000 nm and 1400–1600 nm can be observed. The effectiveness of the prepared materials as a spectral converter is verified by the enhancement of power conversion efficiency of perovskite solar cells. The sample with a UC layer is 15.5% more efficient in converting sunlight to electricity compared to the UC layer-free sample due to the absorption of sunlight in the NIR range. The results suggest the synthesized Yb3+/Er3+ co-doped Na5Lu9F32 single crystals are suitable for enhancing the performance of perovskite solar cells.

    Solar cells have attracted intense research interest due to their capability to convert sunlight to electricity, providing a promising route to obtain clean and renewable energy for human beings[16]. In addition to traditional silicon solar cells, many single-junction solar cells such as organic photovoltatic (OPV) and perovskite solar cells (PSCs), have been developed for practical applications[7,8]. Recently, PSCs have attracted considerable attention for their simple fabrication, low cost, and high power conversion efficiency[916]. Photoelectric conversion efficiency of PSCs has been continuously refreshed from 3.8% in 2009 to more than 20% from recent reports[17]. However, the efficiency is still not comparable to the Shockley–Queisser limit, which can reach a maximum theoretical value of 30%, if the so-called spectral mismatch between the solar spectrum and the band gap of PSCs is overcome[18]. The inability of PSCs to absorb the photons of the near-infrared (NIR) region at 800–1700 nm in the solar spectrum is mainly responsible for the low energy conversion efficiency of the cells. The approach using a luminescent up-converter to combine lower energy photons and produce one higher energy photon within the absorption range of the PSC is a favorable way to resolve the problem[1926].

    Among many up-conversion (UC) materials, the single crystal provides higher transmission for light and thermal stability as well as good chemical durability. Recently, a Na5Lu9F32:Yb3+, Er3+ single crystal with efficient UC luminescence was synthesized in our laboratory[27]. The crystal has low maximum phonon energy (<440cm1), and the optimum UC external quantum efficiency (QE) was about 6.80% under 5.5W·cm2980nm light excitation[28]. The value is higher than the QE from Yb3+/Er3+ co-doped LiYF4 single crystals with 5.72% under 6.2W·cm2980nm light excitation[24]. Thus, we expect that the Er3+/Yb3+ co-doped Na5Lu9F32 single crystal is a promising candidate to improve the performance of PSCs by converting NIR light to visible (VIS) light.

    In this work, we have successfully synthesized highly transparent Na5Lu9F32:Yb3+, Er3+ single crystals and applied them to hybrid PSCs to improve the power conversion efficiency. The co-doping of Yb3+ and Er3+ leads to relatively efficient VIS red and green emissions under the excitation of two NIR bands (900–1000 nm and 1400–1600 nm). The efficiency of the PSCs is improved 15.5% with the presence of the prepared materials as the UC layer, indicating the effectiveness of the Na5Lu9F32:Yb3+, Er3+ single crystals for UC applications.

    Er3+/Yb3+ co-doped Na5Lu9F32 single crystals were grown by an improved Bridgman method. The raw materials were commercially available powders with high purity NaF (99.99%), LuF3 (99.99%), ErF3 (99.99%), and YbF3 (99.99%). The molar compositions of the raw materials were NaF:LuF3:ErF3:YbF3=40:(60x):x:8 (x=0.5,1). The detailed process of the improved Bridgman method was reported elsewhere[27,29]. The obtained single crystals were cut into pieces and well-polished to about 2.0 mm thickness for optical measurements.

    The TiO2 dense electron transport layer was deposited onto C10H8O4(PET)/F:TiO2(FTO) substrates using the radio frequency magnetron sputtering (RFMS) method, where the FTO is etched with 30% HCl and zinc powder from the anodic contact area. The PbI2 film was prepared via the thermal evaporation process, and the PbI2 film was deposited on the dense layer of TiO2 to form FTO/TiO2/PbI2. The resulting film was immersed in CH3NH3I (MAI) solution with isopropanol and reacted to form MAPbI2. The hole transport material (HTM) was deposited by spin-coating a solution of spiro-oMeTAD at 2000 r/min for 35 s in nitrogen atmosphere. An Au electrode with a thickness 100 nm was deposited on the top of HTM via thermal evaporation. In order to utilize the NIR solar radiation sufficiently, we placed the UC single crystals close to the FTO of the PSC in the path of the incident light. The simulated sunlight was used as the light source to radiate the UC crystals. The assembled model is shown in Fig. 1.

    Model of modified perovskite solar cell.

    Figure 1.Model of modified perovskite solar cell.

    The crystal structure was investigated by an XD-98X diffractometer (XD-3, Beijing). The absorption spectra and transmittance spectra were measured with a Cary 5000 UV/VIS/NIR spectrophotometer. The emission spectra were obtained with an FLSP920 type spectrometer (Edinburgh Co., England). All of the measurements were conducted at room temperature in the atmospheric condition.

    Non-masked devices were tested under a Class A solar simulator (ABET Sun 2000) at AM1.5 and 100mW/cm2 illumination conditions calibrated with a reference silicon cell (RERA Solutions RR-1002), using a Keithley 2400 as a source meter in ambient conditions without sealing for density–voltage (J–V) measurements with 1500 V points from +1.5 to 1.5V.

    Figure 2(a) presents the measured X-ray diffraction (XRD) pattern of the 0.5% Er3+/8%Yb3+ co-doped Na5Lu9F32 single crystal. A clear consistency can be found between the measured pattern and the standard Joint Committee on Powder Diffraction Standards (JCPDS) card (27-0725), indicating a pure phase is obtained from the prepared sample. The introduction of Er3+ and Yb3+ ions does not induce significant change of the crystal structure. The Er3+ and Yb3+ ions are expected to substitute the Lu3+ sites due to their similar valence and ionic radius. The lattice parameters of the obtained sample S1 is a=b=c=0.5425nm (space group Fm3m) from the measured XRD patterns. Pires and Davolos reported that the radius difference between the substitution sites and the dopants should be less than 30%, which can be estimated by the following expression[30]: Dr=100×Rm(CN)Rd(CN)Rm(CN),where CN is the coordination number, Dr is the radius difference percentage, and Rd and Rm are the ionic radii for the dopant and substitution site, respectively. The calculated Dr between Er3+(r=1.00,CN=8,1=0.1nm) and Lu3+(r=0.97,CN=8) is 3.09%, while the Dr between Yb3+(r=0.99,CN=8) and Lu3+(r=0.97,CN=8) is 2.06%. Both Dr values are within the allowed range of 30%, suggesting the dopants can effectively enter the Lu3+ sites without altering the crystal structure.

    XRD patterns of Er3+/Yb3+ co-doped Na5Lu9F32 single crystal. Insert is the photo of polished Er3+/Yb3+ co-doped Na5Lu9F32 single crystal.

    Figure 2.XRD patterns of Er3+/Yb3+ co-doped Na5Lu9F32 single crystal. Insert is the photo of polished Er3+/Yb3+ co-doped Na5Lu9F32 single crystal.

    The absorption spectrum in the range of 400–2000 nm for the 1% Er3+/8%Yb3+ co-doped Na5Lu9F32 single crystal sample is shown in Fig. 3(a). Two intense absorption bands centered at 980 and 1514 nm can be observed from the spectrum, corresponding to the transition from the F27/2 ground state to the F25/2 state of Yb3+ ions and the transition of I415/2I413/2 of Er3+ ions. Meanwhile, narrow absorption peaks at 485, 517, 646, and 794 nm in the VIS range can also be observed, which can be ascribed to the transitions of I415/2 to F47/2, H211/2, F49/2, and I49/2 of Er3+ ions, respectively. Figure 3(b) illustrates the transmittance spectrum of the prepared single crystal; the maximum transmittance reaches 89% in the VIS region, indicating that the VIS light can penetrate the single crystal without significant absorption loss when the single crystal is used as the UC layer.

    (a) VIS-NIR absorption spectrum of Er3+/Yb3+ co-doped Na5Lu9F32 single crystals. (b) Transmittance spectrum of Er3+/Yb3+ co-doped Na5Lu9F32 single crystal.

    Figure 3.(a) VIS-NIR absorption spectrum of Er3+/Yb3+ co-doped Na5Lu9F32 single crystals. (b) Transmittance spectrum of   Er3+/Yb3+ co-doped Na5Lu9F32 single crystal.

    Figure 4(a) shows the UC spectra of Er3+/Yb3+ co-doped Na5Lu9F32 crystals in the wavelength range from 400 to 750 nm under the excitation of a 980 nm laser diode with 350mW/cm2. Three characteristic emission peaks centered at 522, 551, and 669 nm can clearly be observed from Fig. 4(a), corresponding to the H211/2I215/2, S43/2I415/2, and F49/2I415/2 transitions of Er3+ ions, respectively. The green emission experiences a significant reduction when the Er3+ concentration increases from 0.5% to 1%. Meanwhile, the red emission is slightly enhanced for the high Er3+ concentration sample.

    (a) VIS UC emission spectra of the Na5Lu9F32: Yb3+, Er3+ single crystal under 980 nm laser excitation. (b) Energy transfer mechanism for Na5Lu9F32: Yb3+, Er3+ under 980 nm excitation.

    Figure 4.(a) VIS UC emission spectra of the Na5Lu9F32:Yb3+, Er3+ single crystal under 980 nm laser excitation. (b) Energy transfer mechanism for Na5Lu9F32:Yb3+, Er3+ under 980 nm excitation.

    The energy level diagram is shown in Fig. 4(b) to illustrate the UC energy transfer (ET) mechanism in the Na5Lu9F32:Yb3+, Er3+ single crystal. The Yb3+ ion with one excited state is an ideal sensitizer for Er3+ ions due to the resonant transitions of Yb3+:2F7/22F5/2 and Er3+:I415/2I411/2. Under the 980 nm pumping light, the Yb3+ ions are promoted to the F25/2 state, from which energy can be transferred to the Er3+ ions to populate the I411/2 state. The ions on the I411/2 state can further be promoted to the F47/2 state by absorbing another portion of energy from the Yb3+ ions. Ions on the F47/2 state undergo a series of non-radiative relaxations to the H211/2, S43/2, and F49/2 states. Green and red emissions can be observed when energies are transferred from these excited states to the ground state.

    Figure 5(a) presents the UC spectra of the prepared samples under 1514 nm excitation. Similar to the 980 nm excited emission spectra, intense green and red emissions can also be obtained when 1514 nm is chosen to pump the samples. The intensity for the green and red emissions is significantly enhanced with the Er3+ concentration increasing from 0.5% to 1%, which is different from the change of emission intensity in Fig. 4(a). In addition, a weak emission peak at 414 nm emerged in the 1% Er3+-doped UC spectra, corresponding to the H29/2I415/2 transition. An energy diagram is also provided in Fig. 5(b), as an attempt to illustrate the UC mechanism under 1514 nm excitation. Ions on the I415/2 ground state are firstly excited to the I413/2 state through ground state absorption (GSA), which are further promoted to the I49/2, F49/2, H211/2, and H29/2 states through the excited state absorption (ESA), generating blue (H29/24I15/2), green (H211/24I15/2, S43/24I15/2), and red emissions (I49/24I15/2) at 414, 528, 549, and 657 nm, respectively. Additionally, ET processes from Yb3+ to Er3+ also exist to contribute UC luminescence. ESA and ET processes simultaneously enhance the UC emission when the prepared samples are used for the UC layer to improve the performance of PSCs[31,32].

    (a) VIS UC emission spectra of the Na5Lu9F32:Yb3+, Er3+ single crystal under 1514 nm laser excitation. (b) Energy transfer mechanism of Na5Lu9F32: Yb3+, Er3+ under 1514 nm excitation.

    Figure 5.(a) VIS UC emission spectra of the Na5Lu9F32:Yb3+, Er3+ single crystal under 1514 nm laser excitation. (b) Energy transfer mechanism of Na5Lu9F32:Yb3+, Er3+ under 1514 nm excitation.

    Figure 6 illustrates the photoluminescence excitation (PLE) spectrum and NIR photoluminescence (PL) spectrum of 0.5%Er3+/8%Yb3+codopedNa5Lu9F32 single crystal, the spectral distribution of sunlight at AM 1.5 G, and the spectral response of the PSC to show the potential application of the prepared material. But, current cells only utilize a relatively small fraction of the solar photons. Evidently, the absorption of the PSC is most efficient from 300 to 800 nm, which suggests 55%–60% of the sunlight cannot be utilized by the PSC as the solar spectral distribution from 800 to 1700 nm is well beyond the effective response range of the PSC. The Er3+/Yb3+ co-doped Na5Lu9F32 single crystal can effectively convert sunlight in the NIR range to the PSC sensitive range. Hence, the prepared material is promising for enhancing the performance of PSCs.

    PLE spectrum (blue) and PL spectrum (gray) of Er3+/Yb3+ co-doped Na5Lu9F32 single crystals. AM 1.5 G solar spectrum (red) and spectral response of PSC (green) are the backgrounds.

    Figure 6.PLE spectrum (blue) and PL spectrum (gray) of Er3+/Yb3+ co-doped Na5Lu9F32 single crystals. AM 1.5 G solar spectrum (red) and spectral response of PSC (green) are the backgrounds.

    Er3+/Yb3+ co-doped Na5Lu9F32 single crystals are placed on top of PSC under the irradiation of simulated solar illumination with an intensity of 100mW/cm2 to verify the potential application of the prepared samples. Figure 7 shows photocurrent J–V characteristics of the PSCs with the presence of Er3+/Yb3+ co-doped Na5Lu9F32 single crystals as UC layers. It can be observed that the short-circuit current density (Jsc) is enhanced from 21.29mA/cm2 for the plain PSC sample to 22.92 and 23.58mA/cm2 when Na5Lu9F32:1%Er3+, 8%Yb3+ and Na5Lu9F32:0.5%Er3+, 8%Yb3+ are used as UC layers, respectively. The efficiency of the PSCs is also improved from 14.69% for the sample without the UC layer to 16.96% and 16.97% for samples with the contribution from the prepared UC materials (see Table 1). An approximate 15.5% enhancement of efficiency is obtained, which verifies the effectiveness of the prepared materials as the UC layer. Detailed photovoltaic parameters are listed in Table 1.

    DevicesJsc(mA·cm2)Voc (V)Fill Factor (FF)η (%)Increase (%)
    Reference PCE (no crystal)21.291.0267.6314.69
    Na5Lu9F32:1%Er3+, 8%Yb3+22.921.0371.8416.9615.45
    Na5Lu9F32:0.5%Er3+, 8%Yb3+23.581.0370.3216.9715.50

    Table 1. Photovoltaic Parameters of the Prepared Perovskite Solar Cells

    J–V curves of the PSCs under simulated solar illumination.

    Figure 7.J–V curves of the PSCs under simulated solar illumination.

    In summary, Er3+/Yb3+ co-doped Na5Lu9F32 single crystals have been grown by an improved Bridgman method. Green and red UC emissions can be obtained under the excitation of both 980 and 1514 nm. The effectiveness of the prepared materials is tested by combining with PSCs. The PSC with an up-converting layer exhibits the maximal power conversion efficiency of 16.97% with an enhancement of 15.5% compared with the reference PSC under the simulated sunlight irradiation. This work provides new possibilities to enhance the power conversion efficiency of PSCs by using single crystals as UC layers.

    References

    [1] M. Liu, M. B. Johnston, H. J. Snaith. Nature, 501, 395(2013).

    [2] H. P. Zhou, Q. Chen, G. Li, S. Lou, T. B. Song, H. S. Duan, J. B. You, Y. S. Liu, Y. Yang. Science, 345, 542(2014).

    [3] J. F. Li, Z. L. Zhang, H. P. Gao, Y. Zhang, Y. L. Mao. J. Mater. Chem. A, 3, 19476(2015).

    [4] Z. L. Zhang, J. F. Li, X. L. Wang, J. L. Wang, J. Q. Qin, W. J. Shi, Y. F. Liu, H. P. Gao, Y. L. Mao. Nanoscale Res. Lett., 12, 43(2017).

    [5] N. S. Lewis. Science, 315, 798(2007).

    [6] J. Hou, O. Inganäs, R. H. Friend, F. Gao. Nat. Mater., 17, 119(2018).

    [7] J. L. Yang, S. Schumann, R. A. Hatton, T. S. Jones. Org. Electron., 11, 1399(2010).

    [8] D. Liu, T. L. Kelly. Nat. Photonics, 8, 133(2014).

    [9] N. G. Park. J. Phys. Chem. Lett., 4, 2423(2013).

    [10] M. A. Green, A. Ho-Baillie, H. J. Snaith. Nat. Photonics, 8, 506(2014).

    [11] H. P. Zhou, Q. Chen, G. Li, S. Luo, T. B. Song, H. S. Duan, Z. R. Hong, J. B. You, Y. S. Liu, Y. Yang. Science, 345, 542(2014).

    [12] R. F. Service. Science, 344, 458(2014).

    [13] N. J. Jeon, J. H. Noh, W. S. Yang, Y. C. Kim, S. Ryu, J. Seo, S. Seok. Nature, 517, 476(2015).

    [14] H. W. Song, C. Cong, Y. J. Wu, L. Liu, Y. B. Gao, X. F. Chen, W. B. Bi, X. Chen, D. L. Liu, Q. L. Dai. Adv. Sci., 6, 1802046(2019).

    [15] C. Cong, H. Li, J. J. Jin, X. Chen, Y. Cheng, Y. Zheng, D. L. Liu, L. Xu, H. W. Song, Q. L. Dai. Adv. Energy Mater., 7, 1700758(2017).

    [16] C. Cong, D. L. Liu, Y. J. Wu, W. B. Bi, X. K. Sun, X. Chen, W. Liu, L. Xu, H. W. Song, Q. L. Dai. Nano Energy, 53, 849(2018).

    [17] W. S. Yang, J. H. Noh, N. J. Jeon, Y. C. Kim, S. Ryu, J. W. Seo, S. Seok. Science, 348, 1234(2015).

    [18] W. Shockley, H. J. Queisser. J. Appl. Phys., 32, 510(1961).

    [19] A. Shalav, B. S. Richards, T. Trupke, K. W. Krämer, H. U. Güdel. Appl. Phys. Lett., 86, 139(2005).

    [20] T. Trupke, A. Shalav, B. S. Richards, P. Würfel, M. A. Green. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells, 90, 3327(2006).

    [21] R. Martín-Rodríguez, S. Fischer, A. Ivaturi, B. Froehlich, K. W. Krämer, J. C. Goldschmidt, B. S. Richards, A. Meijerin. Chem. Mater., 25, 1912(2013).

    [22] J.de Wild, J. K. Rath, A. Meijerink, W. G. J. H. M. van Sark, R. E. I. Schropp. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells, 94, 2395(2010).

    [23] J. Z. Zhang, H. P. Xia, Y. Z. Jiang, S. Yang, H. C. Jiang, B. J. Chen. IEEE J. Quantum Electron., 51, 7000206(2015).

    [24] X. Chen, W. Xu, H. W. Song, C. Chen, H. P. Xia, Y. S. Zhu, D. L. Zhou, S. B. Cui, Q. L. Dai, J. Z. Zhang. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 8, 9071(2016).

    [25] J. Roh, H. Yu, J. Jang. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 8, 19847(2016).

    [26] X. L. Wagn, Z. L. Zhang, J. Q. Qin, W. J. Shi, Y. F. Liu, H. P. Gao, Y. L. Mao. Electrochim. Acta, 245, 839(2017).

    [27] C. Wang, H. P. Xia, Z. G. Feng, Z. X. Zhang, D. S. Jiang, X. M. Gu, Y. P. Zhang, B. J. Chen, H. C. Jiang. J. Alloys Compd., 686, 816(2016).

    [28] S. N. He, H. P. Xia, J. L. Zhang, Y. S. Zhu, B. J. Chen. Sci. Rep., 7, 9(2017).

    [29] J. X. Hu, Y. P. Zhang, H. P. Xia, H. Q. Ye, B. J. Chen, Y. S. Zhu. Inorg. Chem., 57, 7792(2018).

    [30] A. M. Pires, M. R. Davolos. Chem. Mater., 13, 21(2001).

    [31] X. B. Chen. Opt. Commun., 242, 565(2004).

    [32] K. Z. Zheng, D. Zhao, D. S. Zhang, N. Liu, W. P. Qin. Opt. Lett., 35, 2442(2010).

    Xiong Zhou, Hui Wang, Haiping Xia, Hongwei Song, Xu Chen, Jianxu Hu, Baojiu Chen. Efficient up-conversion Yb3+, Er3+ co-doped Na5Lu9F32 single crystal for photovoltaic application under solar cell spectrum excitation[J]. Chinese Optics Letters, 2019, 17(9): 091601
    Download Citation