• Journal of Natural Resources
  • Vol. 35, Issue 12, 2956 (2020)
Dan-dan ZHAO1, Hong ZHOU2、*, and Fu-xiong GAO1
Author Affiliations
  • 1Business School, Jinling Institute of Technology, Nanjing 211169, China
  • 2School of Economics and Management, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210000, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20201211 Cite this Article
    Dan-dan ZHAO, Hong ZHOU, Fu-xiong GAO. Differentiation of farmers, technical constraints and the differences of cultivated land protection technology selection: A theoretical analysis framework of farmer households' technological adoption based on different constraints[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2020, 35(12): 2956 Copy Citation Text show less

    Abstract

    Under the background of incomplete factor market and farmers' differentiation, this paper explores the internal behavior logic between different types of farmers, technical constraints of cultivated land protection and technical choices, in order to provide reference for the sustainable development of cultivated land quality in China. In this paper, probit and logit methods are used to analyze different types of farmers' willingness to choose technology, behavior logic and differences in technology selection under different constraints. The results show that: pure farmers, class I and class II households have unity in farmland protection intention, but with the increase of non-agricultural income, farmers' farmland protection intention gradually decreases. In the aspect of behavioral logic, there are significant differences in the choice of different types of farmers' cultivated land protection technology. There are asymmetry and deviation between different types of farmers' endowment characteristics and different cultivated land protection technology, which are mainly constrained by different technical attributes and risk preferences. Therefore, in the implementation and application of farmland protection technology, more consideration should be given to different farmers' endowment advantages and risk preference.
    π˜0=π0+δ0(1)

    View in Article

    π˜1=π1+δ1(2)

    View in Article

    maxEU=E(π˜0D0+π˜1D1)-12ΦV(π˜0D0+π˜1D1)(3)

    View in Article

    s.t.l0D0+l1D1L(4)

    View in Article

    k0D0+k1D1K(5)

    View in Article

    maxEU=π0D0+π1D1-12Φ[D-D12σ02+D12σ12+2(D-D1)D1ρσ0σ1+λ1(Ll0D0+l1D1)+λ2(Kk0D0+k1D1)(6)

    View in Article

    D1=1Φ(π1π0)+Dσ0(σ0ρσ1)λ1(l1l0)λ2(k1-k0)σ02+σ122ρσ0σ1(7)

    View in Article

    Desi=β0+β1Fari+β2Oni+β3IVi+εit(8)

    View in Article

    Proi,n=α0+α1Fari,n+α2Oi,n+α3Risi,n+εit(9)

    View in Article

    Dan-dan ZHAO, Hong ZHOU, Fu-xiong GAO. Differentiation of farmers, technical constraints and the differences of cultivated land protection technology selection: A theoretical analysis framework of farmer households' technological adoption based on different constraints[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2020, 35(12): 2956
    Download Citation