• Journal of Natural Resources
  • Vol. 35, Issue 6, 1360 (2020)
Xiao-yi WANG1、2, Zheng-an SU1、*, Jing MA2, Hong-kun YANG1、3, Zhou-yao HE1、4, and Tao ZHOU1、5
Author Affiliations
  • 1Key Laboratory of Mountain Hazards and Earth Surface Processes, Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, CAS, Chengdu 610041 China
  • 2College of Water Conservancy and Hydropower Engineering, Sichuan Agricultural University, Ya'an 625014, Sichuan, China
  • 3School of Geoscience and Technology,Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, China
  • 4Forestry College, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China
  • 5University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20200609 Cite this Article
    Xiao-yi WANG, Zheng-an SU, Jing MA, Hong-kun YANG, Zhou-yao HE, Tao ZHOU. Soil infiltration under different patterns of land use and its influencing factor in the Bashang and Baxia regions of Hebei province[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2020, 35(6): 1360 Copy Citation Text show less
    土地利用类型初始入渗速率/(ml/s)稳定入渗速率/(ml/s)稳定入渗时间/s饱和导水率k/(mm/h)
    张北县耕地52.512018
    草地8310023
    灌木林3.51.5908.2
    防护林31606.5
    阳原县高盖地草地5212018.26
    低盖度草地31.59012.15
    耕地21.2908.41
    林地21605.71
    Table 1. Soil infiltration capacity under different land use types
    土地利用类型张北县阳原县
    耕地草地灌木林防护林高盖度草地低盖度草地耕地林地
    容重/(g/cm3)1.310.901.481.321.221.311.391.36
    总孔隙度/%46.4063.2250.2446.1750.2446.5343.3244.31
    有机质/(g/kg)36.5913.5717.5818.4721.686.9410.9020.94
    占比/%
    <0.002 m1.011.961.170.831.952.422.102.13
    0.002~0.02 mm29.6941.2028.4924.2629.0539.0932.6430.84
    0.02~0.05 mm21.3133.2422.1623.0037.3537.2936.0737.11
    0.05~0.1 mm19.0015.5120.0122.0226.2017.4123.8225.51
    0.1~0.25 mm24.967.2324.1825.865.333.125.244.41
    0.25~0.5 mm4.020.873.994.020.120.640.130
    >0.5 mm0000.010.0150.360.0160
    Table 2. Soil physical and chemical characteristics under different land use types
    土地利用类型Kastiakov模型Philip模型G-P综合模型
    张北县耕地f(t)=12.14t-0.23
    P=0.023,R2=0.721
    f(t)=12.90t-0.5+2.29
    P=0.009,R2=0.752
    f(t)=28.53t-0.5+0.79
    P=0.017,R2=0.728
    草地f(t)=5.11t-0.16
    P=0.003,R2=0.969
    f(t)=13.28t-0.5+0.77
    P=0.006,R2=0.855
    f(t)=20.18t-0.5+0.80
    P=0.008,R2=0.855
    灌木林f(t)=2.73t-0.12
    P=0.008,R2=0.903
    f(t)=4.14t-0.5+1.34
    P=0.002,R2=0.992
    f(t)=7.74t-0.5+1.44
    P=0.003,R2=0.938
    防护林f(t)=2.42t-0.16
    P=0.012,R2=0.875
    f(t)=3.36t-0.5+0.85
    P=0.006,R2=0.885
    f(t)=6.23t-0.5+0.65
    P=0.014,R2=0.799
    阳原县高盖度草地f(t)=5.12t-0.15
    P=0.001,R2=0.970
    f(t)=7.31t-0.5+2.08
    P=0.002,R2=0.974
    f(t)=8.28t-0.5+2.35
    P=0.002,R2=0.951
    低盖度草地f(t)=4.08t-0.16
    P=0.003,R2=0.915
    f(t)=6.92t-0.5+1.13
    P=0.003,R2=0.963
    f(t)=6.84t-0.5+1.44
    P=0.006,R2=0.888
    耕地f(t)=2.13t-0.05
    P=0.012,R2=0.846
    f(t)=4.87t-0.5+1.17
    P=0.001,R2=0.995
    f(t)=4.23t-0.5+1.18
    P=0.004,R2=0.925
    林地f(t)=1.81t-0.07
    P=0.012,R2=0.854
    f(t)=4.09t-0.5+0.89
    P=0.006,R2=0.888
    f(t)=3.07t-0.5+1.05
    P=0.006,R2=0.882
    Table 3. Relevant parameters of the fitting formula
    容重总孔
    隙度
    占比/%
    <0.002 mm0.002~0.02 mm0.02~2 mm0.1~0.25 mm0.25~0.5 mm0.1~2.0 mm
    初始入渗速率-0.850**0.856**-0.355-0.3040.3080.789*0.751*0.69
    稳定入渗速率-0.817**0.822**-0.367-0.3190.3220.748*0.771*0.775*
    稳定入渗时间-0.813**0.831**-0.376-0.2820.2870.758*0.812**0.895**
    Table 4. Correlation analysis between soil infiltration capacity and soil physical and chemical properties
    Xiao-yi WANG, Zheng-an SU, Jing MA, Hong-kun YANG, Zhou-yao HE, Tao ZHOU. Soil infiltration under different patterns of land use and its influencing factor in the Bashang and Baxia regions of Hebei province[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2020, 35(6): 1360
    Download Citation