• Chinese Journal of Lasers
  • Vol. 48, Issue 24, 2406001 (2021)
Lixin Yin1、2, Zhichao Liu1、2、*, and Chunhui Liu1、2
Author Affiliations
  • 1College of Optoelectronic Engineering, Changchun University of Science and Technology, Changchun, Jilin 130022, China
  • 2Key Laboratory of Optoelectronic Measurement and Control and Optical Information Transmission Technology of Ministry of Education, Changchun University of Science and Technology, Changchun, Jilin 130022, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/CJL202148.2406001 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Lixin Yin, Zhichao Liu, Chunhui Liu. Surface Structure State Perception System Based on FBG Array[J]. Chinese Journal of Lasers, 2021, 48(24): 2406001 Copy Citation Text show less
    Schematic diagram of micro-element segment before and after deformation
    Fig. 1. Schematic diagram of micro-element segment before and after deformation
    Schematic diagram of coordinate conversion
    Fig. 2. Schematic diagram of coordinate conversion
    Surface strain distributions of structure to be tested. (a) Load is 40 N; (b) load is 100 N
    Fig. 3. Surface strain distributions of structure to be tested. (a) Load is 40 N; (b) load is 100 N
    Schematic diagram of overall system structure
    Fig. 4. Schematic diagram of overall system structure
    Physical distribution diagram of experimental device
    Fig. 5. Physical distribution diagram of experimental device
    Schematic diagrams of fiber wavelength offsets at different pressure points. (a) Pressure point is at s1; (b) pressure point is at s2; (c) pressure point is at s3; (d) pressure point is at s4; (e) pressure point is at s5; (f) pressure point is at s6; (g) pressure point is at s7; (h) pressure point is at s8; (i) pressure point is at s9
    Fig. 6. Schematic diagrams of fiber wavelength offsets at different pressure points. (a) Pressure point is at s1; (b) pressure point is at s2; (c) pressure point is at s3; (d) pressure point is at s4; (e) pressure point is at s5; (f) pressure point is at s6; (g) pressure point is at s7; (h) pressure point is at s8; (i) pressure point is at s9
    Comparison and analysis diagram of actually measured strain values and simulated values
    Fig. 7. Comparison and analysis diagram of actually measured strain values and simulated values
    Three-dimensional surface reconstruction by MATLAB
    Fig. 8. Three-dimensional surface reconstruction by MATLAB
    Three-dimensional surface map after Qualify point cloud processing
    Fig. 9. Three-dimensional surface map after Qualify point cloud processing
    FBG numberDeformation value /mmAbsolute errorΔ /mmRelative errorσ /%
    ANSYSFBGHandyscan
    10.2150.2310.2210.0104.32
    20.2390.2520.2440.0083.17
    30.3510.4030.3770.0266.45
    40.3270.3120.3010.0113.52
    50.1340.1490.1420.0074.70
    60.1380.1510.1410.0106.62
    Table 1. Error analysis table when pressure point is at s2
    FBG numberDeformation value /mmAbsolute errorΔ /mmRelative errorσ /%
    ANSYSFBGHandyscan
    10.2140.2210.2230.0020.90
    20.2290.2330.2460.0135.58
    30.1130.1230.1150.0086.50
    40.1020.1120.1050.0076.25
    50.3350.3420.3310.0113.22
    60.3290.3350.3270.0082.39
    Table 2. Error analysis table when pressure point is at s9
    FBG numberDeformation value /mmAbsolute errorΔ /mmRelative errorσ /%
    ANSYSFBGHandyscan
    10.1230.1410.1360.0053.54
    20.1320.1350.1260.0096.67
    30.2520.2570.2460.0114.28
    40.2470.2520.2680.0166.35
    50.3120.3240.3370.0134.01
    60.3310.3490.3380.0113.15
    Table 3. Error analysis table when pressure point is at s7
    Lixin Yin, Zhichao Liu, Chunhui Liu. Surface Structure State Perception System Based on FBG Array[J]. Chinese Journal of Lasers, 2021, 48(24): 2406001
    Download Citation