RUDIE: Robust approach for underwater digital image enhancement

V. Sidda Reddy; G. Ravi Shankar Reddy; K. Sivanagi Reddy

doi:10.1016/j.jnlest.2024.100286

Journals >Journal of Electronic Science and Technology >Volume 22 >Issue 4 >Page 100286 > Article

Journal of Electronic Science and Technology
Vol. 22, Issue 4, 100286 (2024)

RUDIE: Robust approach for underwater digital image enhancement

V. Sidda Reddy^1,*, G. Ravi Shankar Reddy^2,*, and K. Sivanagi Reddy³

Author Affiliations

¹Department of Information Technology, Stanley College of Engineering and Technology for Women, Hyderabad, 500001, India

²Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, CVR College of Engineering, Hyderabad, 501510, India

³Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Sridevi Women’s Engineering College, Hyderabad, 500075, India

show less

DOI: 10.1016/j.jnlest.2024.100286 Cite this Article

V. Sidda Reddy, G. Ravi Shankar Reddy, K. Sivanagi Reddy. RUDIE: Robust approach for underwater digital image enhancement[J]. Journal of Electronic Science and Technology, 2024, 22(4): 100286 Copy Citation Text

EndNote(RIS)

BibTex

Plain Text

show less

Fig. 1. Robust underwater digital image enrichment model.

Download full size | View in the Article

Fig. 2. Visual comparison between the RUDIE approach and the traditional approaches.

Download full size | View in the Article

Image No.	Input image	[23]	[24]	[25]	[26]	RUDIE
1	7.186	7.133	7.218	7.754	7.728	7.833
2	6.708	6.680	7.815	7.035	7.824	7.853
3	7.252	7.217	7.288	7.402	7.582	7.670
4	6.729	6.706	7.502	6.707	7.582	7.122
5	7.061	7.048	7.711	7.679	7.903	7.958
6	6.926	7.359	7.153	7.667	7.852	7.876
7	6.169	6.771	6.314	7.401	7.823	7.882
8	6.237	6.881	6.516	7.749	7.678	7.692
Average	6.783	6.974	7.190	7.424	7.747	7.799

Table 1. Quantitative evaluations of ENTROPY for Fig. 2.

View in the Article

Image No.	Input image	[23]	[24]	[25]	[26]	RUDIE
1	0.554	0.548	0.810	0.632	0.739	0.783
2	0.532	0.527	0.747	0.667	0.695	0.715
3	0.578	0.571	0.736	0.658	0.715	0.739
4	0.645	0.622	0.709	0.711	0.713	0.721
5	0.519	0.519	0.746	0.697	0.713	0.724
6	0.425	0.457	0.458	0.594	0.699	0.712
7	0.412	0.442	0.433	0.592	0.689	0.705
8	0.419	0.459	0.435	0.664	0.731	0.738
Average	0.511	0.518	0.634	0.652	0.711	0.724

Table 2. Quantitative evaluations of UCIQE for Fig. 2.

View in the Article

Image No.	[23]	[24]	[25]	[26]	RUDIE
1	0.981	0.446	1.172	1.048	1.121
2	0.980	1.135	1.117	1.164	1.178
3	0.963	0.996	1.083	0.996	1.092
4	0.976	1.162	1.075	1.135	1.155
5	1.028	1.050	1.276	1.184	1.191
6	0.986	0.813	1.022	1.062	1.082
7	1.022	0.778	0.914	1.072	1.083
8	1.003	0.961	1.207	1.143	1.154
Average	0.992	0.917	1.108	1.101	1.121

Table 3. Comparison of quantitative evaluations of PCQI for Fig. 2.

View in the Article

Image No.	[23]	[24]	[25]	[26]	RUDIE
1	12.567	16.834	17.789	15.671	18.738
2	13.543	15.347	16.678	15.802	18.457
3	12.678	13.023	14.660	16.456	17.139
4	12.890	15.532	16.945	17.890	18.123
5	11.345	16.789	15.580	16.782	16.834
6	12.906	14.457	15.167	14.890	15.234
7	13.562	14.078	14.567	16.789	16.123
8	14.557	15.890	16.890	18.856	19.907
Average	13.006	15.243	16.034	16.648	17.569

Table 4. Comparison of PSNR for Fig. 2 with conventional methods.

V. Sidda Reddy, G. Ravi Shankar Reddy, K. Sivanagi Reddy. RUDIE: Robust approach for underwater digital image enhancement[J]. Journal of Electronic Science and Technology, 2024, 22(4): 100286

Download Citation

Save the article for my favorites

Paper Information

微信扫一扫：分享

微信扫一扫：分享