• Chinese Journal of Lasers
  • Vol. 46, Issue 10, 1002012 (2019)
Zhaoheng Guo1、**, Jianzhong Zhou1、*, Xiankai Meng1, Qi Sun1, Ming Zhu1, Jianian Yang1, and Qiang Fu2
Author Affiliations
  • 1School of Mechanical Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, Jiangsu 212013, China
  • 2Nanjing Institute of Advanced Laser Technology, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210038, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/CJL201946.1002012 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Zhaoheng Guo, Jianzhong Zhou, Xiankai Meng, Qi Sun, Ming Zhu, Jianian Yang, Qiang Fu. Nanosecond-Pulsed-Laser Paint Stripping of HT250 Gray Cast Iron[J]. Chinese Journal of Lasers, 2019, 46(10): 1002012 Copy Citation Text show less
    Schematics of equipment and path of paint stripping. (a) Schematic of setup for laser paint stripping; (b) schematic of laser stripping path
    Fig. 1. Schematics of equipment and path of paint stripping. (a) Schematic of setup for laser paint stripping; (b) schematic of laser stripping path
    Comparison of laser paint stripping area and binarization. (a) Laser paint stripping area; (b) binarized laser paint stripping area
    Fig. 2. Comparison of laser paint stripping area and binarization. (a) Laser paint stripping area; (b) binarized laser paint stripping area
    Surface morphologies after laser stripping at different laser powers with v=8000 mm/s and f=80 kHz. (a) P=40 W; (b) P=50 W; (c) P=60 W
    Fig. 3. Surface morphologies after laser stripping at different laser powers with v=8000 mm/s and f=80 kHz. (a) P=40 W; (b) P=50 W; (c) P=60 W
    Oxygen content after laser stripping at different laser powers
    Fig. 4. Oxygen content after laser stripping at different laser powers
    Laser stripping surface and residual paint layer morphologies and EDS analysis results of base when f=80 kHz, P=50 W, and v=8000 mm/s. (a) SEM morphology; (b) EDS analysis results; (c) residual paint layer morphology of cleaning surface; (d) partial enlargement of residual paint layer
    Fig. 5. Laser stripping surface and residual paint layer morphologies and EDS analysis results of base when f=80 kHz, P=50 W, and v=8000 mm/s. (a) SEM morphology; (b) EDS analysis results; (c) residual paint layer morphology of cleaning surface; (d) partial enlargement of residual paint layer
    Laser stripping surface and EDS analysis results when f=80 kHz, P=50 W, and v=4000 mm/s. (a) SEM morphology; (b) EDS analysis results
    Fig. 6. Laser stripping surface and EDS analysis results when f=80 kHz, P=50 W, and v=4000 mm/s. (a) SEM morphology; (b) EDS analysis results
    Surface roughness for cleaning at different laser powers
    Fig. 7. Surface roughness for cleaning at different laser powers
    Surface roughness for cleaning at different cleaning speeds
    Fig. 8. Surface roughness for cleaning at different cleaning speeds
    Effect of pulse frequency on remove rate
    Fig. 9. Effect of pulse frequency on remove rate
    Effect of cleaning speeding on remove rate
    Fig. 10. Effect of cleaning speeding on remove rate
    ElementCSiMnSPFe
    Mass fraction /%3.21.790.780.120.08Bal.
    Table 1. Main chemical constituents of HT250 gray cast iron
    ParameterContent
    Wavelength /nm1064
    Power /W≤100
    Pulse width /ns100
    Frequency /kHz≤100
    Scan speed /(mm·s-1)≤8000
    Spot diameter /mm0.05
    Spot shapeCircle
    Table 2. Main technical parameters of laser
    Zhaoheng Guo, Jianzhong Zhou, Xiankai Meng, Qi Sun, Ming Zhu, Jianian Yang, Qiang Fu. Nanosecond-Pulsed-Laser Paint Stripping of HT250 Gray Cast Iron[J]. Chinese Journal of Lasers, 2019, 46(10): 1002012
    Download Citation