• Resources Science
  • Vol. 42, Issue 4, 661 (2020)
Liang ZHAO1、2 and Fanneng HE1、*
Author Affiliations
  • 1Key Laboratory of Land Surface Pattern and Simulation, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources, CAS, Beijing 100101, China
  • 2University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.18402/resci.2020.04.06 Cite this Article
    Liang ZHAO, Fanneng HE. Research progress on the evaluation of post-disaster recovery and reconstruction plan implementation[J]. Resources Science, 2020, 42(4): 661 Copy Citation Text show less
    References

    [1] et al干旱灾害风险评估技术及其科学问题与展望[J]. 资源科学, 35, 1884-1897(2013).

    [2] 关于构建地震灾后恢复重建规划体系的探讨: 以汶川地震为例[J]. 城市规划, 11-15(2009).

    [3] et al芦山地震灾后重建地区土地资源安全评价[J]. 地理学报, 70, 650-663(2015).

    [4] The planning, organization and management of post-disaster reconstruction of the Lushan earthquake based on the local as the main body[J]. Earthquake Research in China, 30, 131-144(2016).

    [5] The progress of emergency response and rescue in China: A comparative analysis of Wenchuan and Lushan earthquakes[J]. Natural Hazards, 74, 421-444(2014).

    [6] [M]. Theoretical and Empirical Research on Urban and Rural Planning Evaluation(2012).

    [7] “多规合一”视角下的中国规划体系重构[J]. 城市规划学刊, 88-95(2016).

    [8] 第二届多灾种预警大会: 从框架到行动[J]. 中国减灾, 60-63(2019).

    [9] 我国灾害风险管理的未来挑战: 解读《2015-2030年仙台减轻灾害风险框架》[J]. 中国减灾, 18-21(2015).

    [10] Speed or deliberation: A comparison of post-disaster recovery in Japan, Turkey, and Chile[J]. Disasters, 41, 696-727(2017).

    [11] Comparative study on the key issues of post-earthquake recovery and reconstruction planning: Lessons from the United States, Japan, Iran, and China[J]. Natural Hazards Review(2015).

    [12] et al国外重大自然灾害区域重建规划的理念和启示[J]. 地理科学进展, 29, 1153-1161(2010).

    [13] 经济学视角的自然灾害损失评估理论与方法评述[J]. 自然灾害学报, 27, 190-198(2018).

    [14] et al气象灾害对中国特殊类型地区贫困的影响[J]. 资源科学, 38, 676-689(2016).

    [15] [M]. 《汶川地震灾后恢复重建总体规划》实施社会影响评估(2010).

    [16] 巨灾后幸存者心理恢复力初步探究: 以1976年唐山地震为例[J]. 自然灾害学报, 17, 86-91(2008).

    [17] 汶川地震灾区受灾群众重建意愿实证研究[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 20, 55-60(2010).

    [18] 国外灾后恢复重建的研究[J]. 聊城大学学报(社会科学版), 78-86(2013).

    [19] [M]. Reconstruction Following Disaster(1977).

    [20] The Disaster Recovery Process: What We Know and Do Not Know from Research[online]. http://dspace.udel.edu/bitstream/handle/19716/309/PP%20286.pdf?sequence=1&is%20Allowed=y

    [21] [M]. 自然灾害类突发事件恢复重建政策体系研究(2009).

    [22] Using formal MS/OR modeling to support disaster recovery planning[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 141, 679-688(2002).

    [23] 对汶川县灾后重建规划评估的思考[J]. 北京规划建设, 121-126(2012).

    [24] 城市防震减灾能力评估研究[J]. 地震学报, 26, 318-329(2004).

    [25] 中国城市规划实施评估研究进展[J]. 规划师, 26, 14-18(2010).

    [26] Recovery and reconstruction after disaster[J]. Encyclopedia of Natural Hazards, 8, 812-824(2013).

    [27] et alCrisis information to support spatial planning in post disaster recovery[J]. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 22, 46-61(2017).

    [28] 国内外规划评估理论与方法[J]. 中国土地, 49-50(2018).

    [29] 西方规划评估: 理论演化与方法借鉴[J]. 城市规划, 37, 90-96(2013).

    [30] Rationality revisited: Planning paradigms in a post postmodernist perspective[J]. Journal of Planning Education & Research, 19, 242-256(2000).

    [31] [M]. Community Impact Assessment and Planning. The Role of Objectives in Evaluation Design[A]. Voogd H. Recent Developments in Evaluation(2001).

    [32] [C]. The Communicative Turn in Planning Theory and Its Implication for Spatial Strategy Formation(1993).

    [33] et alFactors influencing post-disaster reconstruction project management for housing provision in the Gaza strip, occupied Palestinian territories[J]. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 8, 402-414(2017).

    [34] [M]. A Decision-Centred View of Environmental Planning(1987).

    [35] Disaster governance and community resilience: Reflections on Typhoon Morakot in Taiwan[J]. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 58, 24-38(2015).

    [36] Evaluation Communicative Planning[M]. Dordrecht: Kluwer(1997).

    [37] [M]. Introduction: Accounting for Non-market Values in Planning Evaluation(2005).

    [38] et alDeveloping indicators to measure post-disaster community recovery in the United States[J]. Disasters(2016).

    [39] et alTowards networked governance: Improving interagency communication and collaboration fordisaster risk management and climate change adaptation in Australia[J]. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 58, 757-776(2015).

    [40] Does it pay to plan suburban growth?[J]. Journal of the American Planning Association, 50, 19-33(1984).

    [41] 中国城市规划公共政策展望[J]. 城市规划, 32, 33-40(2008).

    [42] 科技评估指标体系设计的原则及其应用研究[J]. 中国软科学, 48-51(2000).

    [43] Recovering cultural built heritage after natural disasters[J]. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 5, 202-212(2014).

    [44] Evaluation and planning: Inseparable concepts[J]. Town Planning Review, 69, 359-374(1998).

    [45] [M]. Urban Land Use Planning(2006).

    [46] [M]. The Green Book: Appraisal and Evaluation in Central Government(2003).

    [47] Evaluation: A Systematic Approach[M]. Newbury Park: Sage(1993).

    [48] Managing the challenge: Winning and implementing the single regeneration budget fund[J]. Planning Practice and Research, 13, 63-80(1998).

    [49] An evaluation framework for assessing resilience of post-disaster housing[J]. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 6, 300-312(2015).

    [50] Speed or deliberation: A comparison of post-disaster recovery in Japan, Turkey, and Chile[J]. Disasters(2016).

    [51] 对汶川震后恢复重建项目后评价工作的探讨[J]. 科技进步与对策, 26, 156-159(2009).

    [52] 地震灾后恢复重建的综合后评价框架体系及实证分析: 以芦山县为例[J]. 地震, 34, 149-159(2014).

    [53] 西方规划评估: 理论演化与方法借鉴[J]. 城市规划, 37, 90-96(2013).

    [54] Post-Ike economic resilience along the Texas coast[J]. Disasters, 39, 493-521(2015).

    [55] et al基于Euclid理论的震后恢复重建民用建筑工程质量评价[J]. 灾害学, 31, 11-16(2016).

    [56] 四川灾区小城镇灾后恢复重建规划研究: 以彭州市通济镇、青川县乔庄镇为例[D]. 武汉: 华中科技大学(2010).

    [57] Political and environmental attitude toward participatory energy and environmental governance: A survey in post-Fukushima Japan[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 201, 190-198(2017).

    [58] Cross-sectional data within 1? Year of the Fukushima meltdown: Effect-size of predictors for depression[J]. Community Mental Health Journal, 52, 94-101(2015).

    [59] 汶川八级地震灾后新建社区现状分析与政策建议[J]. 软科学, 22, 76-80(2008).

    [60] A Study on the Planning of Public Space in Wenchuan’s Post-Earthquake Reconstruction[D]. Guangzhou: South China University of Technology(2015).

    [61] Fourth Generation Evaluation[M]. Newburry Park: Sage Pubns(1989).

    [62] [M]. Policy Analysis by Design(1987).

    [63] Evaluation Communicative Planning[M]. Dordrecht: Kluwer(1997).

    [64] The performance of spatial planning[J]. Planning Practice and Research, 15, 299-318(2000).

    [65] After the plans: Methods to evaluate the implementation success of plans[J]. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 16, 79-91(1996).

    [66] A new model for effective post-disaster housing reconstruction: Lessons from Gujarat and Bihar in India[J]. International Journal of Project Management, 35, 802-817(2017).

    [67] Research on Value Influence-Based Implementation Effect Evaluation of Historical and Cultural Towns and Villages Conservation[D]. Chongqing: Chongqing University(2017).

    [68] Urban planning implementation evaluation: a multilevel fuzzy comprehensive evaluation approach[J]. Open Civil Engineering Journal, 10, 200-211(2016).

    [69] Using Delphi-AHP method to survey major factors causing urban plan implementation failure[J]. Journal of Applied Sciences, 8, 2746-2751(2008).

    [70] et alDecision support for participatory forest planning using AHP and TOPSIS[J]. Forests, 7, 1-17(2016).

    [71] 西方城市规划评估的研究述评[J]. 城市规划学刊, 104-109(2013).

    [72] Implementation of urban land use Plan[J]. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 33, 274-285(1978).

    [73] The planning monitor: An accountability theory of plan evaluation[J]. Environment and Planning A, 11, 745-758(1979).

    [74] Post-disaster assessment of the performance of hazard mitigation projects: The California SMART approach[J]. Journal of Disaster Research, 5, 172-179(2010).

    [75] 论参与式灾后重建的作用和影响[J]. 社会科学研究, 119-126(2018).

    [76] 基于RS和GIS的喀斯特区域水土流失动态监测与分析: 以广西环江县为例[J]. 资源科学, 29, 124-131(2007).

    [77] et al地理学时空数据分析方法[J]. 地理学报, 69, 1326-1345(2014).

    [78] SDGs框架下中国可持续发展评价指标研究[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 28, 9-18(2018).

    Liang ZHAO, Fanneng HE. Research progress on the evaluation of post-disaster recovery and reconstruction plan implementation[J]. Resources Science, 2020, 42(4): 661
    Download Citation