Review on Noise Immune Cavity Enhanced Optical Heterodyne Molecular Spectroscopy

Ma Weiguang; Zhou Yueting; Zhao Gang; Jia Mengyuan; Liu Jianxin; Guo Songjie; Dong Lei; Zhang Lei; Yin Wangbao; Xiao Liantuan; Axner Ove; Jia Suotang

doi:10.3788/CJL201845.0911007

Journals >Chinese Journal of Lasers >Volume 45 >Issue 9 >Page 911007 > Article

Chinese Journal of Lasers
Vol. 45, Issue 9, 911007 (2018)

Review on Noise Immune Cavity Enhanced Optical Heterodyne Molecular Spectroscopy

Ma Weiguang^1、2, Zhou Yueting^1、2, Zhao Gang^1、2, Jia Mengyuan^1、2, Liu Jianxin^1、2, Guo Songjie^1、2, Dong Lei^1、2, Zhang Lei^1、2, Yin Wangbao^1、2, Xiao Liantuan^1、2, Axner Ove³, and Jia Suotang^1、2

Author Affiliations

¹[in Chinese]

²[in Chinese]

³Department of Physics, Ume University, Ume Sweden, SE-901 87

show less

DOI: 10.3788/CJL201845.0911007 Cite this Article Set citation alerts

Ma Weiguang, Zhou Yueting, Zhao Gang, Jia Mengyuan, Liu Jianxin, Guo Songjie, Dong Lei, Zhang Lei, Yin Wangbao, Xiao Liantuan, Axner Ove, Jia Suotang. Review on Noise Immune Cavity Enhanced Optical Heterodyne Molecular Spectroscopy[J]. Chinese Journal of Lasers, 2018, 45(9): 911007 Copy Citation Text

show less

Fig. 1. (a) Principle of NICE-OHMS; relationship of laser components and cavity modes when cavity is (b) empty or (c) filled with targeted gas

Download full size

Fig. 2. Experimental setup of NICE-OHMS based on EDFL

Download full size

Fig. 3. Doppler broadened (a) absorption and (b) dispersion NICE-OHMS signals

Download full size

Fig. 4. Development of detection sensitivity based on Doppler broadened NICE-OHMS

Download full size

Fig. 5. Effects of same loss and different precision on NICE-OHMS signal

Download full size

Fig. 6. (a) CEAS and (b) NICE-OHMS signals with frequency locking by controlling PZT; (c) CEAS and (d) NICE-OHMS signals with frequency locking by controlling combination of PZT and AOM

Download full size

Fig. 7. Schematic of (a) differential and (b) balanced detected NICE-OHMS

Download full size

Reference	Laser	Finesse	Wavelength /nm	Targeted gas	DetectionSensitivity /cm^-1	Detection mode
Ref. [40] 1996	Nd∶YAG	9300	1064	C₂HD	1.8×10^-12	sD
Ref. [16] 1998	Nd∶YAG	100000	1064	C₂HD	1.4×10^-14	sD
Ref.[28] 1999	Ti∶sapphire	17000	790	C₂HD	1.4×10^-14	sD
Ref. [33] 1999	ECDL	300	1660	CH4	9.5×10^-11	sD
Ref. [12] 1999	ECDL	6000	763	O₂	3.8×10^-11	DB
Ref.[41] 2002	Ti∶sapphire	16400	818	C₂H₂	6×10^-12	DB
Ref.[34] 2004	QCL	2415	8518	N₂O	9.7×10^-11	DB
Ref. [42] 2004	ECDL	11000	771	O₂	7×10^-12	DB
Ref.[43] 2006	Ti∶sapphire	20700	797	NO	2×10^-10	DB
Ref.[44] 2007	EDFL	4800	1531	C₂H₂	8×10^-11	DB/sD
Ref.[22] 2009	ECDL	2600	1513	CH₄	2×10^-11	DB
Ref.[36] 2010	DFB	460	1551	C₂H₂	2×10^-10	DB
Ref. [20] 2010	Ti∶sapphire	300	924	$\begin{matrix} N_{2}^{+} \end{matrix}$	—	DB
Ref.[45] 2012	ECDL	4800	1510	HO₂	1.8×10^-9	DB
Ref.[35] 2012	DFG	300	2800-4800	CH₄	2×10^-7	DB
Ref. [38] 2014	OPO	150	3200-3900	HeH⁺, $\begin{matrix} H_{3}^{+} \end{matrix}$ ,HCO⁺ C $\begin{matrix} H_{5}^{+} \end{matrix}$	—	DB
Ref.[21] 2015	ECDL	1600	1529	CH₄,C₂H₂,HCN	4.6×10^-8	DB
Ref.[23] 2015	QD-ECDL	8970	1283	N₂O	6×10^-9	DB
Ref.[46] 2015	ECDL	18500	1400	HD	9.2×10^-9	sD
Ref.[18] 2015	EDFL	55000	1531	C₂H₂	2.2×10^-13	DB
Ref.[47] 2016	OPO	130	3100	HNO+	1×10^-9	DB
Ref.[39] 2017	WGM	55000	1536	C₂H₂, CO₂	6.6×10^-14	DB
Ref.[37] 2017	DFB	169000	1532	CH₄	1×10^-10	DB
Ref.[48] 2017	EDFL	55000	1531	C₂H₂	4.7×10^-14	DB
Ref.[19] 2018	EDFL	55000	1531	C₂H₂	2.2×10^-14	DB

Table 1. Some important parameters of NICE-OHMS performed by research groups so far

Download Citation

Set citation alerts for the article

Tools

Set citation alerts for the article

Save the article for my favorites

Paper Information