• High Power Laser Science and Engineering
  • Vol. 11, Issue 2, 02000e26 (2023)
Lulin Fan1、2, Tongjun Xu1、*, Shun Li1, Zhangli Xu3, Jiancai Xu1, Jianqiang Zhu1, Baifei Shen1、3, and Liangliang Ji1、*
Author Affiliations
  • 1State Key Laboratory of High Field Laser Physics and CAS Center for Excellence in Ultra-intense Laser Science, Shanghai Institute of Optics and Fine Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China
  • 2Center of Materials Science and Optoelectronics Engineering, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
  • 3Department of Physics, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.1017/hpl.2023.25 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Lulin Fan, Tongjun Xu, Shun Li, Zhangli Xu, Jiancai Xu, Jianqiang Zhu, Baifei Shen, Liangliang Ji. Collimated gamma beams with high peak flux driven by laser-accelerated electrons[J]. High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2023, 11(2): 02000e26 Copy Citation Text show less
    Schematic of the experimental setup. (a) A laser pulse propagates through an argon gas target, and energetic electrons are generated and collide with the 2 mm lead target located 2 mm behind the gas target to generate gamma-ray beams. An electron–positron spectrometer (EPS) with an aperture of 10 mm located behind the lead target with an acceptance divergence angle of is added to deflect the positrons and electrons and measure their energy spectra. The gamma-ray beam spectra are measured with a typical differential filtering detector (DFD) and a Compton-scattering spectrometer (CSS) with a gradual magnet, which increases linearly along the laser direction and fills the whole spectrometer. The converter target in the CSS is carbon with thickness of 2 mm. The CSS and DFD are added behind the lead target, which has an acceptance divergence angle of . (b) Trajectories of the converted electron beams dispersed in the gradual magnetic field. These trajectories represent incident electron beams with energies of 0.5–18 MeV. The converted electrons enter the magnetic field with different transverse positions of and different angles of [–.
    Fig. 1. Schematic of the experimental setup. (a) A laser pulse propagates through an argon gas target, and energetic electrons are generated and collide with the 2 mm lead target located 2 mm behind the gas target to generate gamma-ray beams. An electron–positron spectrometer (EPS) with an aperture of 10 mm located behind the lead target with an acceptance divergence angle of is added to deflect the positrons and electrons and measure their energy spectra. The gamma-ray beam spectra are measured with a typical differential filtering detector (DFD) and a Compton-scattering spectrometer (CSS) with a gradual magnet, which increases linearly along the laser direction and fills the whole spectrometer. The converter target in the CSS is carbon with thickness of 2 mm. The CSS and DFD are added behind the lead target, which has an acceptance divergence angle of . (b) Trajectories of the converted electron beams dispersed in the gradual magnetic field. These trajectories represent incident electron beams with energies of 0.5–18 MeV. The converted electrons enter the magnetic field with different transverse positions of and different angles of [–.
    (a) Raw signal of the laser-accelerated electron beam recorded in the IP. (b) Extracted energy spectrum of the energetic electron beam. The black line represents the geometric mean value of the data of two shots. The shaded region represents uncertainty.
    Fig. 2. (a) Raw signal of the laser-accelerated electron beam recorded in the IP. (b) Extracted energy spectrum of the energetic electron beam. The black line represents the geometric mean value of the data of two shots. The shaded region represents uncertainty.
    (a)–(c) Spatial distribution of the electron beam recorded in the IP corresponding to different energies, namely, MeV, E > 9.2 MeV and E > 15 MeV. (d) Electron beam divergence angles of four continuous shots. The blue and red lines represent horizontal and vertical divergence angles, respectively.
    Fig. 3. (a)–(c) Spatial distribution of the electron beam recorded in the IP corresponding to different energies, namely, MeV, E > 9.2 MeV and E > 15 MeV. (d) Electron beam divergence angles of four continuous shots. The blue and red lines represent horizontal and vertical divergence angles, respectively.
    (a) Raw-data of the gamma-photon signal recorded by the DFD. Raw-data of positrons (b) and electrons (c) recorded by the CSS. (d) Experimental spectra from the CSS (black solid), the DFD (red cross) and GEANT4 simulation with the experimental electrons as input (blue solid), within the divergence angle of . These horizontal error bars represent 13 energy intervals and the vertical error bars represent uncertainty for the DFD. The black line represents the geometric mean value of the data and the shaded region represents uncertainty for the CSS.
    Fig. 4. (a) Raw-data of the gamma-photon signal recorded by the DFD. Raw-data of positrons (b) and electrons (c) recorded by the CSS. (d) Experimental spectra from the CSS (black solid), the DFD (red cross) and GEANT4 simulation with the experimental electrons as input (blue solid), within the divergence angle of . These horizontal error bars represent 13 energy intervals and the vertical error bars represent uncertainty for the DFD. The black line represents the geometric mean value of the data and the shaded region represents uncertainty for the CSS.
    (a) The divergence of gamma-ray beam by GEANT4 simulation with energy . (b) Gamma-ray photon () yields and divergence (FWHM) versus different lead thicknesses. The simulation is performed with the experimental electrons as input.
    Fig. 5. (a) The divergence of gamma-ray beam by GEANT4 simulation with energy . (b) Gamma-ray photon () yields and divergence (FWHM) versus different lead thicknesses. The simulation is performed with the experimental electrons as input.
    Lulin Fan, Tongjun Xu, Shun Li, Zhangli Xu, Jiancai Xu, Jianqiang Zhu, Baifei Shen, Liangliang Ji. Collimated gamma beams with high peak flux driven by laser-accelerated electrons[J]. High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2023, 11(2): 02000e26
    Download Citation