• Acta Photonica Sinica
  • Vol. 49, Issue 1, 0112005 (2020)
He JIN1,2, Xiao-nan MAO1,2, Xin-peng LI1,2, Lu-wei YU1,2, and Ping-chuan REN1,2
Author Affiliations
  • 1Shanghai Institute of Spaceflight Control Technology, Shanghai 201109, China
  • 2Shanghai key Laboratory of Aerospace Intelligent Control Technology, Shanghai 201109, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/gzxb20204901.0112005 Cite this Article
    He JIN, Xiao-nan MAO, Xin-peng LI, Lu-wei YU, Ping-chuan REN. Research on Star Tracker On-orbit Low Spatial Frequency Error Compensation[J]. Acta Photonica Sinica, 2020, 49(1): 0112005 Copy Citation Text show less
    热真空试验Thermal vacuum test
    Fig. 1. 热真空试验Thermal vacuum test
    真实焦距与在轨标定焦距Real focal length and calibrated focal length
    Fig. 2. 真实焦距与在轨标定焦距Real focal length and calibrated focal length
    焦距校正前后误差Angle distance error before and after on-orbit calibration
    Fig. 3. 焦距校正前后误差Angle distance error before and after on-orbit calibration
    焦距与畸变同时更新Focal length and distortion parameter calibrated at the same time
    Fig. 4. 焦距与畸变同时更新Focal length and distortion parameter calibrated at the same time
    观星1数据在轨校正前后对比Comparison between data of star observation 1 before and after on-orbit calibration
    Fig. 5. 观星1数据在轨校正前后对比Comparison between data of star observation 1 before and after on-orbit calibration
    观星2数据在轨校正前后对比Comparison between data of star observation 2 before and after on-orbit calibration
    Fig. 6. 观星2数据在轨校正前后对比Comparison between data of star observation 2 before and after on-orbit calibration
    观星3数据在轨校正前后对比Comparison between data of star observation 3 before and after on-orbit calibration
    Fig. 7. 观星3数据在轨校正前后对比Comparison between data of star observation 3 before and after on-orbit calibration
    在轨数据在轨校正前后对比Comparison between on-board data before and after on-orbit calibration
    Fig. 8. 在轨数据在轨校正前后对比Comparison between on-board data before and after on-orbit calibration
    Simulation parameterNumerical value
    FOV17°×17°
    Pixel number1 024×1 024
    Pixel size0.013 mm×0.013 mm
    Nominal focal length47.9 mm
    Principle points(0,0)
    OrbitSSO
    Angle rate0.06°/s
    Frequency1 Hz
    Average number of stars used for attitude determination20
    Star point noiseWhite Gaussian noise 0.13 pixel(3σ)
    Table 1. Simulation parameter
    Angle distance errorLSFE
    Before on-orbit calibration (mean value/3sigma, arcsec)After on-orbit calibration/arcsecBefore on-orbit calibration (x/y, arcsec)After on-orbit calibration (x/y, arcsec)
    Star observation 115.6/28.90.2/20.22.5/2.11.4/1.1
    Star observation 212.6/371.1/32.82.8/2.41.9/0.9
    Star observation 313.6/33.60.9/281.4/2.11.0/0.9
    Table 2. Accuracy before and after on-orbit calibration during star observation
    Before on-orbit calibration (mean value/3σ)After on-orbit calibration
    Angle distance error (mean value/3σ, ″)11.2/36.6-0.2/32.5
    LSFE (x/y, ″)3.9/4.72.3/2.1
    Table 3. Accuracy before and after on-orbit calibration
    He JIN, Xiao-nan MAO, Xin-peng LI, Lu-wei YU, Ping-chuan REN. Research on Star Tracker On-orbit Low Spatial Frequency Error Compensation[J]. Acta Photonica Sinica, 2020, 49(1): 0112005
    Download Citation