Abstract
Keywords
1. Introduction
In recent years, the explosive growth of the demand for wireless capacity has been well-witnessed in both wired and wireless communications, driven by the increased number of Internet end users. It is foreseen that the trend seems likely to continue over the next decade[1]. To meet the requirements of the increasing data capacity, wireless transmission beyond 100 Gbit/s and even Tbit/s is essential[2]. It is hard to obtain such high data rates for current wireless communication in the millimeter-wave or microwave regions due to the limited available bandwidth. In this sense, researchers’ attention has naturally shifted to the terahertz (THz) region (0.3–10 THz), which features large available bandwidth to satisfy the increasing demand for wireless communication traffic[3]. Currently, extensive efforts have been made in the evolution of THz communication to deliver high transmission capacity[4–6].
Among the previously reported THz wireless communication systems, photonics-aided THz communication links clearly show some advantages. First, it is compatible to drive THz transmitters remotely through low-loss optical fibers and hence can be seamlessly connected to the existing fiber-optic network. Moreover, it is straightforward for the photonics-aided communication link to employ flexible carrier switching, complex modulation formats, multicarrier modulation, and so on[7]. As a result, photonics-assisted THz communications are thereby under rapid development. Initially, for instance, the work on 300 GHz wireless demonstration of 50 Gbit/s over 100 m with on–off keying (OOK) modulation format[8] and 100 Gbit/s over 0.1 m with quadrature-phase-shift-keying (QPSK) modulation format[9] is presented. Then 16-ary quadrature amplitude modulation (16-QAM) format has also been adopted to increase spectral efficiency, resulting in photonic wireless experimental demonstrations of 100 Gbit/s in the 350 GHz band[10] and 128 Gbit/s in the 300 GHz band[11]. However, restrained by the emission power of the opto-electronic transmitter, the wireless distance and data rates are restrained. Subsequently, the probabilistic shaping (PS) technique has alternatively been employed in THz photonic wireless communication systems to improve the energy consumption per bit. For example, 132 Gbit/s PS 64-QAM at 400 GHz over 1.8 m and 100 Gbit/s at 350 GHz over 26.8 m have been achieved[12,13].
In addition, some more advanced modulation and multiplexing techniques have also been used in THz photonic wireless communication links, such as 131 Gbit/s orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) at 408 GHz over 10.7 m[15], wavelength division multiplexing (WDM) 260 Gbit/s at 300–500 GHz over 0.5 m[16], and 600 Gbit/s at 320–380 GHz over 2.8 m, combining WDM and the polarization multiplexing (PDM) method[17]. However, demonstrated simultaneous transmission rates over a single pair of THz transceivers are still below 200 Gbit/s, limited by the available THz receiver bandwidth and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). The main challenges include weak opto-electronic THz emission power, high atmospheric propagation loss, and limited THz component bandwidth[18]. On the other hand, the multicarrier scheme shows some advantageous performance compared with single-carrier links in terms of spurious-free dynamic range (SFDR) and noise figure (NF)[19], which can be expected to benefit a THz photonic link. Therefore, we propose combining these advanced techniques, including carrier multiplexing, high-order QAM modulation formats, and well-tailored digital signal processing, to push the single-lane data rate beyond the state-of-the-art envelope in the THz band. Recent development progress on photonic THz communication above 300 GHz is summarized in Table 1.
Sign up for Chinese Optics Letters TOC. Get the latest issue of Chinese Optics Letters delivered right to you!Sign up now
Carrier (GHz) | Data Rate per Lane (Gbit/s) | Modulation Format | Transmission Distance (m) | Ref. |
---|---|---|---|---|
300 | 50 | OOK | 100 | [ |
300 | 100 | QPSK | 0.1 | [ |
350 | 100 | 16-QAM | 2 | [ |
300 | 128 | 0.5 | [ | |
450 | 132 | PS-64-QAM | 1.8 | [ |
350 | 100.8 | 16-QAM-OFDM | 26.8 | [ |
408 | 131 | 10.7 | [ | |
300–500 | 80 | 16-QAM | 0.5 | [ |
320–380 | 155 | PS-64-QAM-OFDM | 2.8 | [ |
300 | 202.5 | 64-QAM | 30 | This work |
Table 1. Development Progress on Photonic THz Communication
In this work, we employ a broadband unitraveling carrier photodiode (UTC-PD, 100 GHz bandwidth)[20] with fast response time, high output saturation current, and high optoelectronic conversion efficiency to generate the THz signals. A Schottky diode mixer downconverts the wireless THz signals to the intermediate frequency (IF) signals. Combining carrier multiplexing, ultrabroadband THz transceivers, well-tailored digital signal processing (DSP) routines, and high-order QAM modulation formats, we experimentally demonstrated a total net transmission capacity of up to 202.5 Gbit/s over 30 m.
2. Experimental Setup
As a proof-of-concept experiment, the configuration of the multicarrier THz wireless link is depicted in Fig. 1(a). To begin with, we employ an external cavity laser (ECL1) to generate a laser beam located at 193.417 THz. Subsequently, the optical carrier is fed into an optical in-phase and quadrature-phase modulator (IQ-MOD, 60 GHz bandwidth) to carry out the baseband signal modulation (64-QAM), and the polarization of optical signal from the ECL1 with the IQ-MOD is aligned by a polarization controller (PC1). In this demonstration, a pseudo-random binary sequence (PRBS-15) is generated from an arbitrary waveform generator (AWG, Keysight M8194, 120 GSa/s). To reduce the intersymbol interference, a root-raised cosine (RRC) filter is employed to pulse-shape the baseband transmitting samples. An erbium-doped fiber amplifier (EDFA) is then used to amplify the modulated optical signals, and the spontaneous emission (ASE) noise from the EDFA is suppressed by a bandpass optical filter. Subsequently, the three free-running optical local oscillators (LOs), i.e., Lasers 2, 3, and 4, are centered at 193.7035, 193.7165, and 193.7295 THz, respectively. A optical coupler combines these three lasers, each with 200 kHz linewidth. Then the filtered optical signal is coupled with combined output modulated optical signals by a 50:50 optical coupler. The output power of the three LO light beams is 15 dBm, which is power-balanced with the filtered optical signal. To maximize the responsivity of a UTC-PD (100 GHz bandwidth), the polarizer (Pol.) and a PC3 are used to align the polarization. In addition, we used a variable optical attenuator (VOA) to control the incident optical power to the UTC-PD. Then the output signal is sent to a 99:1 optical coupler to monitor the optical power entering the UTC-PD to protect the device. After that, the optical signal is fed into the UTC-PD for heterodyne generation of a three-subcarrier THz-modulated signal. The inset illustrates the optical spectra after the 50:50 optical coupler.
Figure 1.Experimental configuration of the multicarrier photonics wireless transmission link. PC, polarization controller; IQ-MOD, in-phase and quadrature modulator; UTC-PD, unitraveling carrier photodiode; AWG, arbitrary waveform generator; LNA, low-noise amplifier; EDFA, erbium-doped fiber amplifier; VOA, variable optical attenuator; Pol., polarizer; DSO, digital storage oscilloscope; LO, local oscillator; inset (a), optical spectrum after the 50:50 optical coupler.
After photomixing in the UTC-PD, three THz signals located at 286.5, 299.5, and 312.5 GHz, named subcarrier_1 (SC_1), subcarrier_2 (SC_2), and subcarrier_3 (SC_3), are generated separately. Figure 2(a) shows the electrical spectrum of the three modulated signals in the THz regions. The modulated data in all three SCs are identical and are not decorrelated due to experimental constraints. However, due to sufficient channel separation and limited coherent cross talk between the channels, we could expect only marginal discrepancies in the overall transmission performance after proper channel decorrelation.
Figure 2.(a) Electrical spectrum of 64-QAM signals before downconversion; (b) picture of experimental setup.
The THz signals are then radiated into free space via a horn antenna and propagate through a 30 m line-of-sight (LOS) free-space link. The wireless distance is obtained with a reflective mirror placed 15 m away from the transmitter and the receiver. A picture of the experimental setup is depicted in Fig. 2(b). After that, the THz beam is collimated and focused by 25 dBi gain THz lenses. After the 30 m wireless transmission, the three-subcarrier modulated signals are first amplified by a low-noise amplifier (LNA, 250–350 GHz, 25 dB gain). Then a Schottky diodes mixer (VDI WR3.4, 220–330 GHz, 40 GHz bandwidth) simultaneously downconverted the three subcarriers to the IF domain. The amplitude and frequency of the LO signal are and 280 GHz, respectively. The LO signal mixed with the three THz signals, and the IF modulated signals located at 6.5, 19.5, and 32.5 GHz are then obtained. In this demonstration, the total occupied bandwidth of the modulated signal is 39 GHz, which is within the detectable IF bandwidth of the mixer (40 GHz), enabling simultaneous reception of three-subcarrier signals. Subsequently, the IF modulated signals are sampled by a 160 GSa/s real-time oscilloscope and are demodulated with offline DSP.
At the transmitter side, the electrical fields at the output of Lasers 1–4 are expressed as
From Eq. (3), three THz signals are generated. At the receiver side, the THz signals are downconverted into the IF domain. The electrical field of the LO signal is , and , , are the power, angular frequency, and phase of the LO signal, respectively. After mixing by the THz mixer, the output IF signal is given as
From Eq. (4), three subcarriers are generated at the output of the THz mixer. Then the signals are sampled by a real-time oscilloscope and demodulated with our well-defined DSP routine.
The link budget can be calculated according to the Friis formula[21], which is expressed as
Link Parameters | Value |
---|---|
Operating frequency | 300 GHz |
Radiation THz power | |
Tx antenna directional gain | 25 dBi |
Tx antenna convergence gain | 20 dBi |
Free-space path loss | 111.5 dB |
Rx antenna convergence gain | 20 dBi |
Rx antenna directional gain | 25 dBi |
LNA gain | 25 dB |
Conversion loss | 12 dB |
Baseband amplified gain | 12 dB |
Table 2. Link Parameters of Our Communication System
In the well-defined DSP routine, we employ three digital mixers located at 6.5, 19.5, and 32.5 GHz to separately downconvert the received three-subcarrier digital signal to the baseband. The digital mixers consist of a low-pass filter, a DC block, and a digital downconverter[22]. Subsequently, a Gram–Schmidt algorithm compensates for the IQ imbalance[23]. Then we employ a time-recovery algorithm based on maximum variance to resample the baseband signal to one sample per symbol (12 Gbaud). We employ the multimodulus algorithm (MMA) to converge the linear adaptive equalizer[24]. The Viterbi algorithm[25] and blind-phase search method[26] are used to compensate for the frequency offset and phase noise, respectively. In the experiment, the threshold of soft decision forward error correction (SD-FEC) with 20% overhead[27] and hard decision forward error correction (HD-FEC) with 6.25% overhead[28] is and , respectively.
3. Results and Discussions
Figure 3 depicts the bit error rate (BER) performance of the three subcarriers after 30 m wireless link. From Fig. 3, one can observe that the transmission performance of each subcarrier improves with the increasing input optical power, and all the transmission performance of the three subcarriers can reach the HD-FEC threshold with 6.25% overhead. In this case, three subcarriers carry an overall transmission capacity of 12 Gbaud × 3 subcarriers × 6 (bit/s)/Hz = 216 Gbit/s. Subtracting the FEC overhead, we achieved a net transmission capacity of 202.5 Gbit/s after 30 m wireless link. In addition, all transmissions through the three THz subcarriers can reach the FEC threshold when the incident optical power is fixed at 11.5 dBm. Moreover, the transmission performance of SC_2 is better than that of SC_1 and SC_3 because the optimal responsivity of the UTC-PD is specified around the SC_2 frequency.
Figure 3.Measured BER performance of three subcarriers after 30 m wireless transmission.
In the experiment, the performance of the photonics THz wireless link at different baud rates is further evaluated when the incident optical power is fixed at 12.5 dBm. The BER performance of the three subcarriers with baud rates from 2 to 12 Gbaud is depicted in Fig. 4(a). One can observe that the transmission performance decreases with the increasing baud rate. Under the fixed emission power, the increasing baud rates result in the decrease of electrical SNR. The constellation diagrams of the three subcarriers at 12 Gbaud are depicted in Figs. 4(b)–4(d), and the BERs for the three subcarriers are , , and , respectively.
Figure 4.(a) Measured BER performance with increasing baud rate of three subcarriers; (b)–(d) constellation of SC_1, SC_2, and SC_3 at 12 Gbaud.
4. Conclusion
In conclusion, a THz communication link simultaneously supporting three subcarriers of 64-QAM modulation format in the 300 GHz region is experimentally obtained. A single-lane aggregated data rate of 216 Gbit/s over 30 m is successfully achieved by employing a single THz emitter and receiver pair, corresponding to a net transmission capacity of 202.5 Gbit/s. The key enabling techniques include spectrally efficient modulation format, subcarrier multiplexing, well-tailored DSP algorithms, and broadband THz transceivers. This achievement pushes the high-speed photonics THz communication beyond the state of the art, which boosts the evolution of next-generation wireless communications.
References
[2] G. Fettweis, F. Guderian, S. Krone. Entering the path towards terabit/s wireless links. Design, Automation & Test in Europe, 1(2011).
[3] V. Petrov, A. Pyattaev, D. Moltchanov, Y. K. Koucheryavy. Terahertz band communications: applications, research challenges, and standardization activities. 2016 8th International Congress on Ultra Modern Telecommunications and Control Systems and Workshops, 183(2016).
[4] H.-J. Song, T. Nagatsuma. Present and future of terahertz communications. IEEE Trans. Terahertz Sci. Technol., 1, 256(2011).
[5] X. Yu, S. Jia, H. Hu, M. Galili, T. Morioka, P. U. Jepsen, L. K. Oxenløwe. 160 Gbit/s photonics wireless transmission in the 300–500 GHz band. APL Photonics, 1, 081301(2016).
[6] L. Zhang, X. Pang, S. Jia, S. Wang, X. Yu. Beyond 100 Gb/s optoelectronic terahertz communications: key technologies and directions. IEEE Commun. Mag., 58, 38(2020).
[7] T. Nagatsuma, G. Ducournau, Y. Yasuda, Y. Fujita, Y. Inubushi, S. Hisatake, A. M. Agoues, G. C. Lopez. Advances in terahertz communications accelerated by photonics. Nat. Photonics, 10, 371(2016).
[8] T. Nagatsuma, K. Oogimoto, Y. Yasuda, Y. Fujita, Y. Inubushi, S. Hisatake, A. M. Agoues, G. C. Lopez. 300-GHz-band wireless transmission at 50 Gbit/s over 100 meters. 41st International Conference on Infrared, Millimeter, and Terahertz waves (IRMMW-THz), 1(2016).
[9] T. Nagatsuma, Y. Fujita, Y. Yasuda, Y. Kanai, S. Hisatake, M. Fujiwara, J. Kani. Real-time 100-Gbit/s QPSK transmission using photonics-based 300-GHz-band wireless link. IEEE International Topical Meeting on Microwave Photonics (MWP), 27(2016).
[10] K. Liu, S. Jia, S. Wang, X. Pang, W. Li, S. Zheng, H. Chi, X. Jin, X. Zhang, X. Yu. 100 Gbit/s THz photonic wireless transmission in the 350-GHz band with extended reach. IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett., 30, 11(2018).
[11] C. Castro, S. Nellen, R. Elschner, I. Sackey, R. Emmerich, T. Merkle, B. Globisch, D. de Felipe, C. Schubert. 32 GBd 16QAM wireless transmission in the 300 GHz Band using a PIN diode for THz upconversion. Optical Fiber Communication Conference (OFC), M4F.5(2019).
[12] X. Li, J. Yu, L. Zhao, W. Zhou, K. Wang, M. Kong, G. Chang, Y. Zhang, X. Pan, X. Xin. 132-Gb/s photonics-aided single-carrier wireless terahertz-wave signal transmission at 450 GHz enabled by 64QAM modulation and probabilistic shaping. Optical Fiber Communication Conference (OFC), M4F.4(2019).
[13] S. Wang, Z. Lu, W. Li, S. Jia, L. Zhang, M. Qiao, X. Pang, N. Idrees, M. Saqlain, X. Cao, C. Lin, Q. Wu, X. Zhang, X. Yu. 26.8-m THz wireless transmission of probabilistic shaping 16-QAM-OFDM signals. APL Photonics, 5, 056105(2020).
[14] S. Jia, M.-C. Lo, L. Zhang, O. Ozolins, A. Udalcovs, D. Kong, X. Pang, R. Guzman, X. Yu, S. Xiao, S. Popov, J. Chen, G. Carpintero, T. Morioka, H. Hu, L. K. Oxenløwe. Integrated dual-laser photonic chip for high-purity carrier generation enabling ultrafast terahertz wireless communications. Nat. Commun., 13, 1388(2022).
[15] X. Pang, S. Jia, O. Ozolins, X. Yu, H. Hu, L. Marcon, P. Guan, F. Da Ros, S. Popov, G. Jacobsen, M. Galili, T. Morioka, D. Zibar, L. K. Oxenløwe. 260 Gbit/s photonic-wireless link in the THz band. IEEE Photonics Conference(2016).
[16] S. Jia, L. Zhang, S. Wang, W. Li, M. Qiao, Z. Lu, N. M. Idrees, X. Pang, H. Hu, X. Zhang, L. K. Oxenløwe, X. Yu. 2 × 300 Gbit/s line rate PS-64QAM-OFDM THz photonic-wireless transmission. J. Light. Technol., 38, 4715(2020).
[17] X. Yu, R. Asif, M. Piels, D. Zibar, M. Galili, T. Morioka, P. U. Jepsen, L. K. Oxenløwe. 400-GHz wireless transmission of 60-Gb/s Nyquist-QPSK signals using UTC-PD and heterodyne mixer. IEEE Trans. THz Sci. Technol., 6, 765(2016).
[18] L. Zhang, M. Qiao, S. Wang, Z. Lu, L. Zhang, X. Pang, X. Zhang, X. Yu. Nonlinearity aware optoelectronic terahertz discrete multitone signal transmission with a zero-bias diode. Opt. Lett., 45, 18(2020).
[19] J. M. Singley, V. J. Urick, J. F. Diehl, K. J. Williams, F. Bucholtz. Increased performance of single-channel analog photonic links enabled by optical wavelength-division multiplexing. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech., 67, 1274(2019).
[20] T. Ishibashi, Y. Muramoto, T. Yoshimatsu, H. Ito. Unitraveling carrier photodiodes for terahertz applications. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron., 20, 79(2014).
[21] H. T. Friis. A note on a simple transmission formula. Proc. IRE, 34, 254(1946).
[22] X. Pang, A. Caballero, A. Dogadaev, V. Arlunno, L. Deng, R. Borkowski, J. S. Pedersen, D. Zibar, X. Yu, I. T. Monroy. 25 Gbit/s QPSK hybrid fiber-wireless transmission in the W-band (75–110 GHz) with remote antenna unit for in-building wireless networks. IEEE Photon. J., 4, 691(2012).
[23] I. Fatadin, S. J. Savory, D. Ives. Compensation of quadrature imbalance in an optical QPSK coherent receiver. IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett., 20, 1733(2008).
[24] P. J. Winzer, A. H. Gnauck, C. R. Doerr, M. Magarini, L. L. Buhl. Spectrally efficient long-haul optical networking using 112-Gb/s polarization-multiplexed 16-QAM. J. Light. Technol., 28, 547(2010).
[25] I. Fatadin, S. J. Savory. Compensation of frequency offset for 16-QAM optical coherent systems using QPSK partitioning. IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett., 23, 1246(2011).
[26] A. J. Viterbi, A. M. Viterbi. Nonlinear estimation of PSK-modulated carrier phase with application to burst digital transmission. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, 29, 543(1983).
[27] D. Chang, F. Yu, Z. Xiao, N. Stojanovic, F. N. Hauske, Y. Cai, C. Xie, L. Li, X. Xu, Q. Xiong. LDPC convolutional codes using layered decoding algorithm for high speed coherent optical transmission. OFC/NFOEC, 1(2012).
[28] L. M. Zhang, F. R. Kschischang. Staircase codes with 6% to 33% overhead. J. Light. Technol., 32, 10(2014).
Set citation alerts for the article
Please enter your email address