Author Affiliations
Hefei National Laboratory for Physical Sciences at the Microscale, Department of Chemical Physics, and Synergetic Innovation Center of Quantum Information & Quantum Physics, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui 230026, PR Chinashow less
Fig. 1. Schematic illustration of the three, major contributions (i.e., GSB, SE, and ESA) to a typical
${\it\Delta}A$ spectrum (at a certain time delay
${\it\tau}$ between the pump and the probe), as marked in the left panel
[14], where the profile labeled ‘Sum’ (thickened solid line) represents the realistic ‘overlapping’
${\it\Delta}A$ spectrum visualized by the spectrometer. The right panel depicts the corresponding, three processes monitored in a time-resolved pump–probe configuration (with a WLC probe, typically).
Fig. 2. (a) Schematic optical layout of a typical ultrafast TA setup that features a tunable pump (delivered by a femtosecond optical parametric amplifier) and a broadband WLC probe (generated by focusing a small portion of the Ti:sapphire regenerative amplifier output in a transparent nonlinear crystal). (b) The CDP ExciPro femtosecond pump–probe system that operates in our ultrafast spectroscopy laboratory at USTC
[15].
Fig. 3. (a)
${\it\Delta}A({\it\lambda},{\it\tau})$ spectra recorded on the highly oxidized, as-synthesized GO (
$\text{C}/\text{O}\approx 2.7/1$) samples using a 570-nm pump and a WLC probe (490–530 nm for blue-shifted probing and 630–770 nm for red-shifted probing). (b) Schematic illustration of the band structure of the graphene–ORD model as well as the VB-hole blockade effect responsible for the type-I graphene-like dynamics observed in the blue-shifted probing regime. (c) A typical type-I kinetic trace extracted from the line cutting at 520 nm in (a). (d) A representative kinetic trace observed in pristine graphene
[23] for comparison with (c). All the figures are adapted from Ref. [
20].
Fig. 4. (a) Schematic of the three-dimensional network of PCN-222 that features large channels running through the
$c$-axis. (b) The amount of
$\text{HCOO}^{-}$ produced as a function of the time of Visible-light irradiation over (i) PCN-222, (ii) H
2TCPP, (iii) no PCN-222, (iv) no TEOA, and (v) no CO
2. A Xe lamp was filtered to produce light in 420–800 nm. (c)
${\it\Delta}A$ spectra of PCN-222 recorded at different probe delays (pump at 500 nm). (d) A representative
${\it\Delta}A$ kinetic trace of PCN-222 probed at 430 nm. (e) Schematic illustration of the photoexcited dynamics involved in H
2TCPP (left) and PCN-222 (right). All the figures are adapted from Ref. [
26].
Fig. 5. (a) Schematic illustration of the synthesized Cu
3(BTC)
2@TiO
2 core–shell structure. (b) Production yields of CH
4 and H
2 from CO
2 using Cu
3(BTC)
2@TiO
2 as photocatalysts under the UV irradiation for 4 h, in reference to bare TiO
2 and bare Cu
3(BTC)
2. All the samples were carefully pretreated to remove any carbon contaminants. (c) Representative
${\it\Delta}A$ kinetic traces for bare TiO
2, bare Cu
3(BTC)
2, and Cu
3(BTC)
2@TiO
2, probed at 450, 600, and 600 nm, respectively (pump at 350 nm). (d) Schematic illustration of the mechanisms involving the interface states-related electron transfer and relaxation dynamics. All the figures are adapted from Ref. [
28].
Fig. 6. (a) Production yield of gluconic acid (in 2 h)
versus the UV-light incident power using Pd–TiO
2 as catalysts (in reference to Pd nanocubes and bare TiO
2), showing a
${\it\Lambda}$-shaped relationship. (b) Representative
${\it\Delta}A$ kinetic traces (left: 0–2 ns, right: 0–30 ps; probe at 520 nm) recorded with a 480-nm pump. (c) Schematic illustration of the mechanisms involving the electron transfer and relaxation dynamics under the 480-nm photoexcitation. (d) Representative
${\it\Delta}A$ kinetic traces (left: 0–2 ns, right: 0–30 ps; probe at 520 nm) recorded with a 350-nm pump. (e) Schematic illustration of the mechanisms involving the electron transfer and relaxation dynamics under the 350-nm photoexcitation. All the figures are adapted from Ref. [
30].
Fig. 7. (a) Schematic illustration of molecular co-catalysis strategy for accelerating hole transfer. Homogeneous molecular co-catalysts use reversible redox couple and highly active free radical reactions to promote hole transfer, unlike the conventional, supported heterogeneous co-catalysts that are constrained by finite contact areas between co-catalysts and reactants. (b) Photocatalytic activity on the K
4Nb
6O
17 nanosheet catalysts with different molar ratio of TFA/K
4Nb
6O
17. Reaction conditions: 50 mg catalyst, 200 mL 20 vol% methanol aqueous solution, and a specific amount of TFA, under irradiation of a 300-W Xe lamp. Representative
${\it\Delta}A$ kinetics probed at 500 nm (pump at 300 nm) for K
4Nb
6O
17 in (c) the absence and (d) the presence of TFA. (e) Steady-state and (f) time-resolved PL spectra (excitation at 315 nm; emission at 430 nm) for both K
4Nb
6O
17 and K
4Nb
6O
17–TFA. (g) Schematic illustration of the charge separation mechanisms involving the electron/hole defect states-related dynamics. All the figures are adapted from Ref. [
32].