• Photonics Research
  • Vol. 13, Issue 2, 297 (2025)
A. S. Ashik*, Peter John Rodrigo, Henning E. Larsen, and Christian Pedersen
Author Affiliations
  • DTU Electro, Department of Electrical and Photonics Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, 4000 Roskilde, Denmark
  • show less
    DOI: 10.1364/PRJ.531876 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    A. S. Ashik, Peter John Rodrigo, Henning E. Larsen, Christian Pedersen, "Differential absorption laser spectroscopy at 8 kHz using precompensated current modulation," Photonics Res. 13, 297 (2025) Copy Citation Text show less

    Abstract

    We present a differential laser absorption spectroscopy (DLAS) system operating at 1550 nm for rapid and sensitive gas concentration measurements. A dual-wavelength toggling mechanism is presented, which significantly reduces data processing, hence supporting a high update rate and data robustness against fast-changing environmental conditions. We showcase the ability to toggle between two wavelengths separated by 90 pm in 14 μs and with minimal chirp (1pm), facilitating sensitive DLAS measurements at 8 kHz update rate. This performance is achieved by driving a 1550 nm diode laser with a modified square-wave current pulse, overcoming the thermal time constant limited wavelength-modulation response of the diode laser. A sensitive feedback mechanism ensures excellent long-term wavelength stability better than 1.4 pm peak-to-peak at 8 kHz toggling over 20 h. As a performance test, we measured the volumetric ratio (VMR) of hydrogen cyanide (HCN) gas in a fiber-coupled gas cell with less than 0.2% peak-to-peak variation over 20 h at 40 Hz. A best sensitivity in VMR of 8×10-6 was achieved at 25 ms integration time. The simplicity and high update rate of our system make it well-suited for gas monitoring in dynamic atmospheric and industrial environments. Further, it offers potential utility in applications requiring precise wavelength control, such as injection seeding of pulsed lasers. A simple analytical model is derived, which, in detail, supports the experimental results, hence offering a tool for future design optimization.
    y(t)=h(t)i(t),

    View in Article

    ySTEP(t)=h(t)iSTEP(t)=a+b·etτb+c·etτc,

    View in Article

    H(s)=sYSTEP(s).

    View in Article

    YC(s)=H(s)(1s+p1s+1τm)=(1+p)YSTEP(s)p(1τms+1τm)YSTEP(s).

    View in Article

    YC(s)=(1+p)YSTEP(s)+p[a(1s1s+1τm)+bτbτmτb(1s+1τb1s+1τm)+cτcτmτc(1s+1τc1s+1τm)].

    View in Article

    yC(t)=(1+p)ySTEP(t)+p[a(iSTEP(t)etτm)+bτbτmτb(etτbetτm)+cτcτmτc(etτcetτm)].

    View in Article

    PT=βP0eαgas(λ)l,

    View in Article

    TONTOFF=(UONgasAgas)(UOFFrefAref)(UONrefAref)(UOFFgasAgas)=e[αgas(λON)αgas(λOFF)]l,

    View in Article

    1lln(TONTOFF)=qPgS(Tg)kBTg[g(λON)g(λOFF)],

    View in Article

    A. S. Ashik, Peter John Rodrigo, Henning E. Larsen, Christian Pedersen, "Differential absorption laser spectroscopy at 8 kHz using precompensated current modulation," Photonics Res. 13, 297 (2025)
    Download Citation