Fig. 1. Experimental device. , half-wave plate; , 1/4-wave plate; lens with focal length of 100 mm; SLM, space light modulator; CCD, charge coupled device.
Fig. 2. Simulation and experimental comparison. (a)–(d) are simulation plots, and (e)–(h) are experimental plots. (a), (e) , ; (b), (f) , ; (c), (g) , ; (d), (h) , .
Fig. 3. When the vortex parameter , the HG beam pattern is vortex modulated by different orders. (a) , ; (b) , ; (c) , ; (d) , ; (e) , ; (f) , ; (g) , ; (h) , .
Fig. 4. Diagram of HG beams with , , and different topological charge . (a) , (b) , (c) , (d) , (e) , (f) , (g) , and (h) .
Fig. 5. Sinusoidal vortex modulated HG beam diagram with different-order vortex parameters, . (a) , ; (b) , ; (c) , ; (d) , ; (e) , ; (f) , ; (g) , ; (h) , .
Fig. 6. Sinusoidal vortex modulated HG beam with , , and different topological charge . (a) , (b) , (c) , (d) , (e) , (f) , (g) , and (h) .
Fig. 7. Data analysis diagram of sinusoidal vortex modulation with parameters , , and . (a) Light intensity distribution collected by CCD. (b) A cross section perpendicular to the axis. (c) A cross section perpendicular to the axis. (d) Three-dimensional intensity distribution.