Author Affiliations
College of Electronics and Information Engineering, Sichuan University, Chengdu,Sichuan 610064, Chinashow less
Fig. 1. Schematic diagram of two-stage tube laser amplifier. (a) Production of annular aberration;(b) schematic diagram of tube laser structure
Fig. 2. Schematic diagram of configuration for correcting in two-stage tube laser amplifier with self-correction
Fig. 3. Comparison of the curves of β factor and far-field intensity distributions before and after self-correction.(a1)--(a8) Concentricity error; (b1)--(b8) parallelism error; (c1)--(c8) collimation error
Fig. 4. Intensity distribution with self-correction on the focal plane(Δθs=1 mrad)
Fig. 5. Wavefront aberration decomposition of tube laser. (a) Wavefront before correction;(b) wavefront after correction
Fig. 6. Schematic diagram of matching error of two-stage tubes
Fig. 7. Schematic diagram of right-angle conical reflector errors. (a) Translation error and rotation error; (b) taper error
Fig. 8. Curves of β factor and far-field intensity distributions after non-ideal cone lens compensation. (a) Translation errors; (b) rotation errors; (c) taper errors
Fig. 9. Wavefront aberration decomposition of tube laser. (a) Translation error is 10 μm; (b) rotation error is 10 mrad; (c) taper error is 20 μrad
Δx /μm | Before correction | After correction |
---|
Tube1 | Tube2 | β | PV /μm | β | PV /μm | 0.3(X) | 0.3(X) | 4.15 | 13.30 | 1.07 | 0.06 | 0.3(X) | 0.3(Y) | 2.33 | 10.00 | 1.07 | 0.06 | 0.3(X) | -0.3(X) | 1.08 | 0.08 | 1.00 | ≈0 | 0.5(Y) | -0.5(Y) | 1.08 | 0.08 | 1.00 | ≈0 | 0.5(X) | 0.5(Y) | 5.93 | 25.60 | 1.07 | 0.06 | 0.5(X) | -0.3(X) | 1.53 | 4.70 | 1.07 | 0.06 | 0.5(X) | -0.3(Y) | 2.41 | 10.30 | 1.07 | 0.06 |
|
Table 1. Comparison of self-correction effect before and after concentricity error
Δx /μm | Before correction | After correction |
---|
Tube1 | Tube2 | β | PV /μm | β | PV /μm | 10(X) | 0(X) | 2.47 | 10.5 | 1.07 | 0.06 | 0(X) | 10(X) | 3.07 | 14.2 | 1.11 | 0.12 | 5(X) | -5(X) | 2.20 | 8.9 | 1.10 | 0.11 | 5(X) | 5(Y) | 6.00 | 31.1 | 1.12 | 0.13 | 5(X) | -5(Y) | 6.03 | 31.1 | 1.14 | 0.15 |
|
Table 2. Comparison of self-correction effect before and after parallelism error