Abstract
1. INTRODUCTION
Photostructural changes in amorphous chalcogenide thin films and chalcogenide glasses have been extensively studied for many decades [1]. The chemical bond rearrangement induced by light excitation having energy near the bandgap of these materials leads to the modifications of the amorphous matrix, resulting in changes of optical properties [2]. These are referred to as photodarkening (PD) and photobleaching (PB), depending on the sign of the change [3]. The magnitude of PD and PB is related to the composition and structure of chalcogenide materials. While in binary arsenic-based chalcogenides only PD occurs, both germanium-based binaries [4,5] and ternaries show rather complex behavior with the sign of the change being a product of the competitive processes of PD and PB [6,7].
The PD of exposed annealed films of and that may be partially recovered by the consequent annealing was reported as early as the 1970s by De Neufville
The aim of this paper is to provide a study of photoinduced changes in Ge-Sb-Se chalcogenide thin films, which are of particular interest in the field of photonic integrated circuits for their potential application in nonlinear optics [12] and optical sensors in the mid-infrared domain [13,14]. The nominal composition of was chosen based on our previous work related to a photosensitivity study on this system [15]. It combines favorable optical properties and expected photosensitivity. Relatively high optical bandgap energy causes the orange color of thin films within the range of thicknesses under study, which in combination with low surface reflectivity allows easy detection of photoinduced changes. The insight into the photoinduced changes provided in this paper summarizes up to date available references and tries to recognize the challenges in understanding the general principles of these phenomena. The influence of thickness and the laser optical intensity on the kinetics of these processes is discussed.
Sign up for Photonics Research TOC. Get the latest issue of Photonics Research delivered right to you!Sign up now
2. METHODS
A sputtering target () of chalcogenide glass was synthesized by a melt-quenching technique described elsewhere [16]. Thin films with thicknesses of 350, 500, and 650 nm were deposited by rf-sputtering (13.56 MHz) at working pressure of argon onto well-cleaned microscope slides (soda-lime float glass, substrate length of 76 mm). The variance in the thickness was estimated to be within the substrate length. Selected thicknesses were found to be optimal for our experiments, as the penetration depths of the pump laser described below are and for as-deposited and annealed films, respectively.
The composition of thin films was verified by energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) with a scanning electron microscope (JEOL IT-300, JEOL Ltd., Japan). X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were collected within the range of from 10° to 80° with a step of 0.02° (Cu , Rigaku, Japan). Thicknesses of the thin films and their initial optical properties, specifically, refractive index and optical bandgap energy , were determined from variable angle spectroscopic ellipsometry (VASE, J. A. Woollam, USA).
Annealing of samples was performed at a temperature of 250°C (i.e., glass transition temperature of bulk ) for 2 h (heating rate of , cooling rate of ) under an argon atmosphere.
The kinetics of photoinduced changes of both as-deposited and annealed samples at room temperature was studied by means of
Figure 1.(a) Experimental scheme of irradiation setup for
The changes were expressed as the time evolution of the absorption coefficient calculated as , where is the initial transmittance, and is the transmittance at elapsed time . The selected value of the initial transmittance at irradiation wavelength was , corresponding to the region of exponential absorption edge (Urbach edge, at initial value of absorption coefficient of order of ). It is worth to note that the small changes in thickness are expected during irradiation (such as photoinduced volume change in chalcogenide glass [17]); however, this does not affect the value of significantly. Changes in reflectance during irradiation were also neglected.
The magnitude of the absorption edge shift by means of a change of succeeding irradiation was determined directly from transmittance measurements using WVASE32 software (J. A. Woollam, USA). It should be emphasized that the evaluation of the absolute values of and its changes was not the target of this work, and so the precision of the estimation using this approach is rather coarse with expected accuracy of about . Potential changes in local structure upon thermal annealing and irradiation were examined by a μ-Raman spectrometer (LabRam HR800, Horiba Jobin-Yvon, USA) coupled with a 100× microscope (Olympus, Japan).
3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
A. Optical Properties of Thin Films
The chemical composition of the vitreous target was found to be Ge24Sb11Se66 (, atomic fraction). In agreement with a previous work on this system [16], slight changes in stoichiometry during the sputtering process were observed, as the composition of thin films was (, atomic fraction). The optical bandgap energy of as-deposited thin films was , and the refractive index at 1550 nm was as determined by VASE using a Cody–Lorentz oscillator model. An annealing treatment caused bleaching of thin films, resulting in an optical bandgap energy increase to accompanied by a slight refractive index decrease to . Both as-deposited and annealed ones were found to be amorphous according to XRD measurements.
As shown in Fig. 1(b), the prolonged irradiation caused the change of an opposite sign, i.e., PB in as-deposited films and PD in annealed ones, reasonably of the highest magnitude when the laser optical intensity of was used. It should be noted that even after 3 h of irradiation, the photoinduced change was not fully saturated, and so for measurements at lower laser optical intensities, the irradiation time was conserved.
The highest magnitude of PB by means of an increase in of about was found in the sample with a thickness of . On the other hand, the highest measure of PD, specifically, the decrease in by , was found in the sample with a thickness of under the abovementioned conditions.
B. Millisecond Kinetics of Photoinduced Changes
The study of the time evolution of the absorption coefficient revealed several types of photoinduced effects. First, as-deposited films exhibit fast PD, which is entirely dominated by PB in the long term. Such behavior has already been observed in some as-deposited selenide films, e.g., in evaporated [18] and Ge-As-Se [7], pulsed laser deposited Ge-Sb-Se [19], or in cosputtered Ga-Sb-Se [20]. Moreover, only PD takes place during the irradiation of annealed films. Finally, a transitory change, specifically, transient PD (TPD), was observed in both as-deposited and annealed thin films.
As seen in Fig. 2 (top panel), PB in as-deposited thin films is strongly thickness dependent, having the magnitude of a process indirectly proportional to the thickness. It is worth to note that the PB effect in the film with a thickness of (violet curve) is closest to being saturated when irradiated by laser optical intensity. Presumably, the observed PB effect upon prolonged near-bandgap irradiation is of a similar origin to the bleaching upon thermal annealing. Such a change comes from a mutual polymerization of defective entities resulting in ordered structures via homo- to heteropolar bond conversion [1]. The excitation generates the charged radiation defects followed by recombination-induced bond rearrangements due to the diffusion of atoms [21]. Although the photoexcited states have not yet been proven experimentally [22], their existence leading to an increased short- and medium-range order [23] is a generally accepted explanation of irreversible changes in different properties including an absorption edge shift. Other stabilization mechanisms, such as void collapsing [22], evaporation of volatile entities, and photo-enhanced oxidation [24], may contribute to these changes. Because the experiments performed in this work were carried out in a pure argon atmosphere, we do not expect that the latter has an important contribution to the observed effects.
Figure 2.Time evolution of absorption coefficient
In contrast with PB observed in as-deposited thin films, the PD in annealed thin films as seen in Fig. 2 (bottom panel) is proportionally dependent on the thickness and is a universal process observed in annealed chalcogenide glasses and thin films, i.e., reversible PD effect, which may be recovered by thermal annealing. The mechanism of reversible changes is not yet known, as no subtle structural changes have yet been experimentally determined. They are likely the result of a similar elemental process to the irreversible ones, i.e., recombination-induced bond rearrangements and atom motions [3]. Presumably, the reversible PD comes from valence band broadening, resulting in a redshift [22].
The origin of fast PD in as-deposited films is not yet fully understood. Sati and Jain [6] proposed that it originates in homo- to heteropolar bond conversion at deformed sites such as Se–Se dimers at the [] or Sb–Sb bonds caused by Sb–Sb–Se in defective [] pyramidal units, present in evaporated Ge-Sb-Se thin films, and is simply a competitive process to slow PB, which becomes dominant in the long term. Relative to time, the magnitude of PB is rather small compared to PD.
Besides being thickness dependent, fast PD and slow PB in as-deposited and reversible PD in annealed Ge-Sb-Se thin films are strongly dependent on laser optical intensity as depicted in Figs. 3(a) and 3(b), respectively. The time evolution of fast PD shows a saturation at within and clearly delays with decreasing intensity. A similar observation was reported for evaporated Ge-As-Se films by Khan
Figure 3.(a) Time evolution of absorption coefficient
Transitory changes by means of TPD were easily noticed by the on/off experiments in Fig. 3(c). TPD has already been observed by various authors [7,19,26–29] and may be related to a phenomenon termed as an “optical stopping effect” by Matsuda
Finally, the results on millisecond kinetics of photoinduced changes in as-deposited and annealed Ge-Sb-Se thin films suggest that they are of the very same origin as in the Ge-As-Se system [29]. Even though the sign and the magnitude of a change may differ with composition and structure [5,7,15], the TPD and reversible PD in annealed thin films seem to be a universal feature of photoinduced changes in amorphous chalcogenides.
C. Structural Changes upon Annealing and Irradiation
Changes in local structure upon thermal annealing and irradiation were investigated using Raman scattering spectroscopy measurements. As depicted in Fig. 4, the Raman spectra of Ge-Sb-Se thin films are
Figure 4.(a) Normalized reduced intensity of Raman spectra of nonirradiated as-deposited and (b) nonirradiated annealed Ge-Sb-S thin films.
To justify changes in structure, Raman spectra were deconvoluted using eight Gaussian peaks. Besides the five peaks mentioned above, the rotational modes in selenium polymeric chains ( [35]) and bending vibrational modes of Se–Se at the outrigger ( [36]) are altogether represented by the Gaussian peak centered at . The vibrational mode of chains in amorphous selenium found at , stretching vibrational modes of Se–Se bonds at the outrigger (), vibrational modes of Se–Se dimers and short chains in corner-linked [], ( [35]), and Ge–Ge homopolar bonds’ vibrations coming from [ (, 2, 3, 4)], found at [34] are collectively represented by Gaussian at . Finally, asymmetric vibrational modes of tetrahedrons are found at [32].
Upon thermal annealing, an apparent change in the ratio between (green) and (blue) peaks occurred. A simultaneous decrease in the intensity of a peak centered at (red) and (orange) indicates the consumption of selenium atoms as a consequence of increased local order. Other noticeable changes occurred around the peak. These changes may be due to a decrease in Ge–Ge homopolar bonds in ethane-like [] units. Changes in intensity of surrounding peaks upon thermal annealing are low and difficult to justify.
Photostructural changes by means of Raman scattering spectroscopy have already been described by several authors. The bond breaking mechanism upon irradiation followed by bond rearrangement and/or crystallization of structural sites is usually connected to changes in optical properties (i.e., shift of the absorption edge and refractive index changes upon irradiation) [4,7,37]. Being noteworthy, even in the highly photosensitive composition of , the fully saturated PD process results in only up to 1% of nearest neighbor bond alterations at available atomic sites [2]. As only low to moderate laser optical intensities were used in the present study, negligible changes in Raman spectra were observed and do not allow a fine analysis of the mechanisms involved.
It can be assumed that the abovementioned structural changes upon thermal annealing are responsible for a transition from the PB observed in as-deposited and reversible PD in annealed Ge-Sb-Se thin films. In addition, although the experiments were carried out under a pure argon atmosphere, the photo-enhanced oxidation should not be completely ruled out from the contribution to the photoinduced changes, as the concentration of germanium is (atomic fraction) [38].
4. CONCLUSION
A comprehensive study of photosensitivity in amorphous thin films by means of time evolution of the absorption coefficient revealed several types of photoinduced effects in these materials. Fast PD followed by a slow dominative PB process is present in as-deposited films, while only PD takes place during prolonged irradiation of annealed films. The structural changes upon thermal annealing seem to be responsible for a transition from the PB observed in as-deposited and reversible PD in annealed thin films. TPD was observed in both as-deposited and annealed thin films and, together with a PD in annealed films, seems to be a universal feature of photoinduced changes in amorphous chalcogenides. The processes behind metastable PD and PB in the as-deposited films as well as TPD, which seem to be associated with transitory photoexcited states, remain to be better understood. Furthermore, a thorough study of surface and thickness changes upon irradiation and annealing as well as long-term stability at normal room conditions in similar systems is also of interest. Such investigations may lead to the implementation of these materials and photonic processes in them in the design and engineering of photonic integrated circuits by means of tailoring and optimization of optical properties and inscription of three-dimensional structures (e.g., waveguides, holographic gratings, and diffractive optics elements).
References
[1] J. P. De Neufville, S. C. Moss, S. R. Ovshinsky. Photostructural transformations in amorphous As2Se3 and As2S3 films. J. Non-Cryst. Solids, 13, 191-223(1974).
[2] S. Ducharme, J. Hautala, P. C. Taylor. Photodarkening profiles and kinetics in chalcogenide glasses. Phys. Rev. B, 41, 12250-12259(1990).
[3] H. Fritzsche. The origin of reversible and irreversible photostructural changes in chalcogenide glasses. Philos. Mag. B, 68, 561-572(1993).
[4] R. R. Kumar, A. R. Barik, E. M. Vinod, M. Bapna, K. S. Sangunni, K. V. Adarsh. Crossover from photodarkening to photobleaching in a-Ge
[5] T. Halenkovič, J. Gutwirth, T. Kuriakose, M. Bouška, M. Chauvet, G. Renversez, P. Němec, V. Nazabal. Linear and nonlinear optical properties of co-sputtered Ge-Sb-Se amorphous thin films. Opt. Lett., 45, 1523-1526(2020).
[6] D. C. Sati, H. Jain. Coexistence of photodarkening and photobleaching in Ge-Sb-Se thin films. J. Non-Cryst. Solids, 478, 23-28(2017).
[7] P. Khan, H. Jain, K. V. Adarsh. Role of Ge:As ratio in controlling the light-induced response of a-Ge
[8] G. Pfeiffer, M. A. Paesler, S. C. Agarwal. Reversible photodarkening of amorphous arsenic chalcogens. J. Non-Cryst. Solids, 130, 111-143(1991).
[9] A. Arriola, S. Gross, M. Ams, T. Gretzinger, D. Le Coq, R. P. Wang, H. Ebendorff-Heidepriem, J. Sanghera, S. Bayya, L. B. Shaw, M. Ireland, P. Tuthill, M. J. Withford. Mid-infrared astrophotonics: study of ultrafast laser induced index change in compatible materials. Opt. Mater. Express, 7, 698-711(2017).
[10] G. Torun, A. Yadav, K. A. Richardson, Y. Bellouard. Ultrafast laser direct-writing of self-organized microstructures in Ge-Sb-S chalcogenide glass. Front. Phys., 10, 883319(2022).
[11] A. Zakery, S. R. Elliott. Optical properties and applications of chalcogenide glasses: a review. J. Non-Cryst. Solids, 330, 1-12(2003).
[12] E. Delcourt, N. Jebali, L. Bodiou, M. Baillieul, E. Baudet, J. Lemaitre, V. Nazabal, Y. Dumeige, J. Charrier. Self-phase modulation and four-wave mixing in a chalcogenide ridge waveguide. Opt. Mater. Express, 10, 1440-1450(2020).
[13] M. Baillieul, E. Baudet, K. Michel, J. Moreau, P. Němec, K. Boukerma, F. Colas, J. Charrier, B. Bureau, E. Rinnert, V. Nazabal. Toward chalcogenide platform infrared sensor dedicated to the
[14] V. Mittal, G. Z. Mashanovich, J. S. Wilkinson. Perspective on thin film waveguides for on-chip mid-infrared spectroscopy of liquid biochemical analytes. Anal. Chem., 92, 10891-10901(2020).
[15] T. Halenkovič, J. Gutwirth, P. Němec, E. Baudet, M. Specht, Y. Gueguen, J.-C. Sangleboeuf, V. Nazabal. Amorphous Ge-Sb-Se thin films fabricated by co-sputtering: properties and photosensitivity. J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 101, 2877-2887(2018).
[16] F. Verger, V. Nazabal, F. Colas, P. Němec, C. Cardinaud, E. Baudet, R. Chahal, E. Rinnert, K. Boukerma, I. Peron, S. Deputier, M. Guilloux-Viry, J. P. Guin, H. Lhermite, A. Moreac, C. Compère, B. Bureau. RF sputtered amorphous chalcogenide thin films for surface enhanced infrared absorption spectroscopy. Opt. Mater. Express, 3, 2112-2131(2013).
[17] K. Tanaka. Photoexpansion in As2S3 glass. Phys. Rev. B, 57, 5163-5167(1998).
[18] A. R. Barik, R. Naik, K. V. Adarsh. Unusual observation of fast photodarkening and slow photobleaching in a-GeSe2 thin film. J. Non-Cryst. Solids, 377, 179-181(2013).
[19] M. Olivier, R. Boidin, P. Hawlová, P. Němec, V. Nazabal. Kinetics of photosensitivity in Ge-Sb-Se thin films. International Conference on Photonics, Optics and Laser Technology (PHOTOPTICS), 61-66(2015).
[20] T. Halenkovič, J. Gutwirth, M. Bouška, L. Calvez, P. Němec, V. Nazabal. Amorphous Ga–Sb–Se thin films fabricated by co-sputtering. Opt. Lett., 45, 29-32(2020).
[21] Y. S. Kaganovskii, H. Genish, M. Rosenbluh. Laser recording in chalcogenide glass films: driving forces and kinetics of the mass transfer. Phys. Status Solidi A, 217, 2000523(2020).
[22] K. Tanaka, K. Shimakawa. Light-induced phenomena. Amorphous Chalcogenide Semiconductors and Related Materials, 163-226(2021).
[23] L. Tichý, V. Smrčka, H. Tichá, E. Sleeckx, P. Nagels. On the origin of photo-induced and thermally induced irreversible bleaching of amorphous Ge-Se films. Philos. Mag. Lett., 68, 73-79(1993).
[24] C. A. Spence, S. R. Elliott. Light-induced oxidation and band-edge shifts in thermally evaporated films of germanium chalcogenide glasses. Phys. Rev. B, 39, 5452-5463(1989).
[25] P. Khan, A. R. Barik, E. M. Vinod, K. S. Sangunni, H. Jain, K. V. Adarsh. Coexistence of fast photodarkening and slow photobleaching in Ge19As21Se60 thin films. Opt. Express, 20, 12416-12421(2012).
[26] K. Shimakawa, Y. Ikeda. Transient responses of photodarkening and photoinduced volume change in amorphous chalcogenide films. J. Optoelectron. Adv. Mater., 8, 2097-2100(2006).
[27] A. Ganjoo, K. Shimakawa, K. Kitano, E. A. Davis. Transient photodarkening in amorphous chalcogenides. J. Non-Cryst. Solids, 299–302, 917-923(2002).
[28] Q. Yan, H. Jain, J. Ren, D. Zhao, G. Chen. Effect of photo-oxidation on photobleaching of GeSe2 and Ge2Se3 films. J. Phys. Chem. C, 115, 21390-21395(2011).
[29] Z. Zhang, S. Xu, Y. Chen, X. Shen, R. Wang. Photo-induced effects in Ge-As-Se films in various states. Opt. Mater. Express, 10, 540-548(2020).
[30] A. Matsuda, H. Mizuno, T. Takayama, M. Saito, M. Kikuchi. “Stopping effect” on guided light in As–S films by a laser beam. Appl. Phys. Lett., 24, 314-315(1974).
[31] A. V. Kolobov, H. Oyanagi, K. Tanaka, K. Tanaka. Structural study of amorphous selenium by in situ EXAFS: observation of photoinduced bond alternation. Phys. Rev. B, 55, 726-734(1997).
[32] P. Němec, B. Frumarová, M. Frumar. Structure and properties of the pure and Pr3+-doped Ge25Ga5Se70 and Ge30Ga5Se65 glasses. J. Non-Cryst. Solids, 270, 137-146(2000).
[33] Z. G. Ivanova, E. Cernoskova, V. S. Vassilev, S. V. Boycheva. Thermomechanical and structural characterization of GeSe2–Sb2Se3–ZnSe glasses. Mater. Lett., 57, 1025-1028(2003).
[34] K. Jackson, A. Briley, S. Grossman, D. V. Porezag, M. R. Pederson. Raman-active modes of a-GeSe2 and a-GeS2: a first-principles study. Phys. Rev. B, 60, R14985(1999).
[35] M. Olivier, J. C. Tchahame, P. Němec, M. Chauvet, V. Besse, C. Cassagne, G. Boudebs, G. Renversez, R. Boidin, E. Baudet, V. Nazabal. Structure, nonlinear properties, and photosensitivity of (GeSe2)100-
[36] E. Baudet, C. Cardinaud, A. Girard, E. Rinnert, K. Michel, B. Bureau, V. Nazabal. Structural analysis of RF sputtered Ge-Sb-Se thin films by Raman and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopies. J. Non-Cryst. Solids, 444, 64-72(2016).
[37] S. Zhang, Y. Chen, R. Wang, X. Shen, S. Dai. Observation of photobleaching in Ge-deficient Ge16.8Se83.2 chalcogenide thin film with prolonged irradiation. Sci. Rep., 7, 14585(2017).
[38] L. Tichý, H. Tichá, K. Handlíř, K. Jurek. Photoinduced bleaching of Ge35S65 amorphous film. J. Non-Cryst. Solids, 101, 223-226(1988).
Set citation alerts for the article
Please enter your email address