Author Affiliations
1School of Earth Sciences and Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing 211100, Jiangsu, China2Key Laboratory of Spatial-Temporal Big Data Analysis and Application of Natural Resources in Megacities, Ministry of Natural Resources, Shanghai 200063, China3Key Laboratory of Urban Land Resources Monitoring and Simulation, Ministry of Natural Resources, Shenzhen 518034, Guangdong, Chinashow less
Fig. 1. Flow chart for riparian line extraction
Fig. 2. Diagram of rough river shoreline extraction
Fig. 3. Dynamic threshold removes the high point
Fig. 4. Shoreline “burr” points
Fig. 5. Normal angle diagram
Fig. 6. Normal gradient constraint joins adjacent points
Fig. 7. Remove tidal points
Fig. 8. Remove high noise points
Fig. 9. Riverbank rough contour
Fig. 10. Real shoreline under the trees
Fig. 11. Height statistics of coarse riverbank contour
Fig. 12. Adaptive dynamic threshold correction
Fig. 13. Elevation histogram. (a) Single-peak elevation histogram; (b) bimodal elevation histogram
Fig. 14. Normal gradient constraint result. (a) Normal gradient constraint theory; (b) real shoreline under raster diagram; (c) real shoreline points in CloudCompare software
Fig. 15. Overlay of shoreline and imagery. (a) River shoreline map; (b) central island shoreline map;(c)overlapped map of extractive shoreline and actual shoreline
Fig. 16. Statistical histogram of error distribution extracted from the river edge. (a) Contour tracking method; (b) our method
Fig. 17. Extraction results comparison of our method and contour tracking method in different environments. (a) Extraction result of central island by contour tracking method; (b) extraction result of central island by our method; (c) extraction result of river bank by contour tracking method; (d) extraction result of river bank by our method
Method | RMSE /m | Correct number of points |
---|
Contour tracking method | 0.2675 | 278 | Ours | 0.2018 | 362 |
|
Table 1. River edge extraction error analysis table