• Journal of Applied Optics
  • Vol. 46, Issue 1, 17 (2025)
Tingting LI1,2, Yajun PANG1,2,*, and Jianyang LIU1,2
Author Affiliations
  • 1Center for Advanced Laser Technology, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin 300401, China
  • 2Hebei Key Laboratory of Advanced Laser Technology and Equipment, Tianjin 300401, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.5768/JAO202546.0109002 Cite this Article
    Tingting LI, Yajun PANG, Jianyang LIU. Advances in spectral matching techniques for solar simulators[J]. Journal of Applied Optics, 2025, 46(1): 17 Copy Citation Text show less
    Structural layout of spectrum correction module[61]
    Fig. 1. Structural layout of spectrum correction module[61]
    Triple-source solar simulator designed by JENKINS P, et al[67]
    Fig. 2. Triple-source solar simulator designed by JENKINS P, et al[67]
    Luminaire layout diagram of solar simulator designed by BAGUCKIS A, et al[70]
    Fig. 3. Luminaire layout diagram of solar simulator designed by BAGUCKIS A, et al[70]
    LED layout diagram of solar simulator designed by NOVICKOVAS A, et al[79]
    Fig. 4. LED layout diagram of solar simulator designed by NOVICKOVAS A, et al[79]
    Standards organizationsPerformance parameters
    Spectral matchIrradiation non-uniformityTemporal instability
    IEC 60904-9-2007A0.75~1.25±2%±2%
    B0.6~1.4±5%±5%
    C0.4~2.0±10%±10%
    JIS C8942-2009MS0.95~1.05±2%±1%
    MA0.75~1.25±2%±1%
    B0.6~1.4±3%±3%
    C0.4~2.0±10%±10%
    ASTM E927-19A0.75~1.25±2%±2%
    B0.6~1.4±5%±5%
    C0.4~2.0±10%±10%
    Table 1. Classifications of solar simulators in IEC, JIS and ASTM standards
    Spectral rageTotal irradiance (IEC、JIS)Total irradiance (ASTM)
    400 nm~500 nm18.4%18.21%
    500 nm~600 nm19.9%19.73%
    600 nm~700 nm18.4%18.20%
    700 nm~800 nm14.9%14.79%
    800 nm~900 nm12.5%12.39%
    900 nm~1 100 nm15.9%15.89%
    Table 2. Reference spectral distribution in IEC, JIS and ASTM standards
    GradeClass A+Class AClass BClass C
    Spectral match0.875-1.1250.75-1.250.6-1.40.4-2.0
    Irradiation non-uniformity≤±1%≤±2%≤±5%≤±10%
    Temporal instability≤±1%≤±2%≤±5%≤±10%
    Table 3. Solar simulator grade according to IEC 60904-9-2020 standard
    Spectral rageTotal irradiance
    300 nm~470 nm16.61%
    470 nm~561 nm16.74%
    561 nm~657 nm16.67%
    657 nm~772 nm16.63%
    772 nm~919 nm16.66%
    919 nm~1200 nm16.69%
    Table 4. Reference spectral distribution in range of 300 nm~1 200 nm according to IEC 60904-9-2020 standard
    YearLight sourceSpectral rangeSpectrum/Spectral matching degree/Spectral gradeRef
    20126 pulsed Xenon lamps + filters400 nm~1 100 nmAM1.5G/0.91~1.05/A[59]
    2013Xenon arcs + filters300 nm~1 100 nmAM1.5G/-/A[60]
    2013Xenon arcs + filters400 nm~1 100 nmAM1.5G/-/A[62]
    2015Xenon arcs + 4 filters300 nm~1 700 nmAM0/0.8514/A[61]
    2016Xenon lamps + combined filters400 nm~1 200 nmAM1.5G/0.946/A[63]
    2022Xenon arcs + filters400 nm~1 100 nmAM1.5G/0.8~1.2/A[64]
    Table 5. Spectral matching performances of solar simulators with traditional light sources
    YearLight sourceSpectral rangeSpectrum/Spectral matching degree/Spectral gradeRef
    1962Xenon arc + TungstenAM0/-/-[65]
    1990Xenon arc + Tungsten Halogen350 nm~1 000 nmAM1.5G/-/-[66]
    2005Xenon arc + TungstenAM0/-/-[67]
    2009Halogen + 8-color LEDs400 nm~1 100 nmAM1.5G/-/B[72]
    2009Xenon arc + Ectothermic blackbody0.4 μm~12 μmAM1.5G/0.85/A[68]
    2012Xenon arc + 53-color LEDs380 nm~1 000 nmAM1.5G/0.97/A[71]
    2016Halogen + 6-color LEDs400 nm~1 100 nmAM1.5G/0.75/A[70]
    2023Xenon arc + Halogen350 nm~1 800 nmAM0/-/A[69]
    Table 6. Spectral matching performances of multi-source solar simulators
    YearLight sourceSpectral rangeSpectrum/Spectral matching degree/Spectral gradeRef
    20084-color LEDsAM1.5G/0.77/A[73]
    201018-color-LEDs390 nm~940 nmAM1.5G/0.9/A[74]
    201423-color LEDs350 nm~1 100 nmAM1.5G/-/A[75]
    2015LEDs300 nm~1 100 nmAM1.5G/0.99/A[77]
    20156-color LEDs400 nm~1 100 nmAM1.5G/0.92~1.08/A[81]
    20166-color LEDs400 nm~1 100 nmAM1.5G/-/A[79]
    20186-color LEDs400 nm~1 100 nmAM1.5G/0.995/A[76]
    201815-color LEDs400 nm~1 100 nmAM1.5G/0.94/A[78]
    201911-color LEDs400 nm~900 nmAM1.5G/-/A[82]
    202039-color LEDs400 nm~1 100 nmAM1.5G/0.9544/A[83]
    202119-color LEDs250 nm~1 000 nmAM1.5G/-/A[80]
    20186-color LEDs400 nm~1 100 nmAM1.5G/0.995/A[76]
    201815-color LEDs400 nm~1 100 nmAM1.5G/0.94/A[78]
    201911-color LEDs400 nm~900 nmAM1.5G/-/A[82]
    202039-color LEDs400 nm~1 100 nmAM1.5G/0.9544/A[83]
    202119-color LEDs250 nm~1 000 nmAM1.5G/-/A[80]
    Table 7. Spectral matching performances of LED solar simulators