• Acta Photonica Sinica
  • Vol. 53, Issue 11, 1122002 (2024)
Jun FENG1,2, Siyuan LI1,*, Feicheng WANG1,2, Wencong CHEN1,2..., Feifei TIAN1,2 and Xinyin JIA1|Show fewer author(s)
Author Affiliations
  • 1Xi'an Institute of Optics and Precision Mechanics,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Xi'an 710119,China
  • 2University of Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100049,China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/gzxb20245311.1122002 Cite this Article
    Jun FENG, Siyuan LI, Feicheng WANG, Wencong CHEN, Feifei TIAN, Xinyin JIA. Optimization Design of Large Aperture Curved Prism Bonding Based on Finite Element Analysis[J]. Acta Photonica Sinica, 2024, 53(11): 1122002 Copy Citation Text show less
    Generalized Maxwell mechanical model
    Fig. 1. Generalized Maxwell mechanical model
    Schematic diagram of colloid non-free curing
    Fig. 2. Schematic diagram of colloid non-free curing
    The simulation flow of adhesive curing face shape
    Fig. 3. The simulation flow of adhesive curing face shape
    Optimal design route of high profile precision bonding of large aperture curved prism
    Fig. 4. Optimal design route of high profile precision bonding of large aperture curved prism
    Frame topology optimization process
    Fig. 5. Frame topology optimization process
    Stress distribution of three kinds of frame structures
    Fig. 6. Stress distribution of three kinds of frame structures
    Assembly drawing of curved prism assembly
    Fig. 7. Assembly drawing of curved prism assembly
    Effect of adhesive on shape
    Fig. 8. Effect of adhesive on shape
    Isoline map of colloid parameters standardization
    Fig. 9. Isoline map of colloid parameters standardization
    Influence of bonding quantity on surface shape of curved prism
    Fig. 10. Influence of bonding quantity on surface shape of curved prism
    Influence of bonding quantity on face shape
    Fig. 11. Influence of bonding quantity on face shape
    Surface shape and residual analysis of curved prism
    Fig. 12. Surface shape and residual analysis of curved prism
    The effect of the 3-way gravity on the component
    Fig. 13. The effect of the 3-way gravity on the component
    Influence of 4 ℃ uniform temperature rise on components
    Fig. 14. Influence of 4 ℃ uniform temperature rise on components
    Curve diagram of the effect of temperature gradient on the component
    Fig. 15. Curve diagram of the effect of temperature gradient on the component
    The influence of mechanical and thermal coupling factors on face shape
    Fig. 16. The influence of mechanical and thermal coupling factors on face shape
    MethodPrincipleVantageDifficulty
    Stress birefringence methodStress-optical lawsNo need to measure adhesive parameters

    1. Only for glass materials

    2. Matching of equal effectiveness

    Forced displacement

    method

    Thermal stressNo requirement for material properties

    1. Constrained area needs to be considered

    2. Not applicable to large caliber analysis

    Temperature load

    method

    Thermal deformation

    1. No requirement for material properties

    2. Large,medium and small diameters can be analyzed

    Cannot analyze other thermal analyses
    Table 1. Comparison of 3 simulation methods
    StructureMaterialsYoung's modulus/MPaCoefficient of expansion/(×10-6 K-1Density/(kg·m-3Poisson's ratio
    Flexible structureInvar1412.48 1000.25
    Picture frameAlSiC2005.983 0400.22
    Curved prismQuartz72.50.512 2030.17
    Table 2. Material property sheet of curved prism assembly
    MaterialsModified Young's modulus/MPaCoefficient of expansion/(×10-6 K-1Density/(kg·m-3Poisson's ratio
    3M-22161 378102.0(0~40 ℃)1 4700.430
    134(40~80 ℃)
    Milbond7 104(-50 ℃)62(-54~20 ℃)1 2000.49
    1 902(20 ℃)72(20~70 ℃)
    GHJ-014 758.672(>20 ℃)1 2200.495
    Table 3. Adhesive material related properties
    Performances3M-2216MilbondGHJ-01
    Recommended thickness/mm0.102±0.0250.381±0.0250.1±0.025
    Tensile strength/MPa≥54≥14.5≥10
    Shear strength/MPa

    21(-55 ℃)

    22(24 ℃)

    4(82 ℃)

    17.7(-50)

    14.5(25)

    ≥1
    Scope of application/℃-55~+150-54~+70-60~+80
    Curing time

    30 min(93 ℃)

    2 h(66 ℃)

    7 d(24 ℃)

    3 h(71 ℃)

    7 d(25 ℃)

    7 d(23 ℃)

    2 d(40)

    3 h(60~80)

    Front surfacePV value/nm100.8587.059.9
    RMS value/nm22.2136.313.3
    Back surfacePV value/nm64.8336.839.1
    RMS value/nm12.677.26.81
    Table 4. Comparison of the performance of 3 types of adhesives
    InfluencesSurface Accuracy
    Mirror surfacePV value/nmRMS value/nm
    Optimized BondingFront2.780.53
    Back1.580.31
    Z-direction gravityFront16.663.01
    Back29.315.34
    4 ℃ uniform temperature riseFront6.631.51
    Back4.070.69
    Adhesive curing + Z-direction gravityFront18.63.45
    Back29.15.55
    4 ℃ uniform temperature rise + Z-direction gravityFront29.095.96
    Back36.857.38
    Table 5. Surface shape accuracy of curved prism mirror
    Jun FENG, Siyuan LI, Feicheng WANG, Wencong CHEN, Feifei TIAN, Xinyin JIA. Optimization Design of Large Aperture Curved Prism Bonding Based on Finite Element Analysis[J]. Acta Photonica Sinica, 2024, 53(11): 1122002
    Download Citation