• Optics and Precision Engineering
  • Vol. 32, Issue 8, 1130 (2024)
Leqian KANG1, Pengcheng YANG1,*, Qiujuan LÜ2, Liping LIAN1,3, and Xindong ZHU4
Author Affiliations
  • 1School of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Xi'an Polytechnic University,Xi'an70048, China
  • 2Department of Basic, Rocket Force University of Engineering, Xi'an71005, China
  • 3College of Optoelectronic Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing400040, China
  • 4Ministry of Education Key Laboratory for Nonequilibrium Synthesis and Modulation of Condensed Matter, School of Physics, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an71009, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.37188/OPE.20243208.1130 Cite this Article
    Leqian KANG, Pengcheng YANG, Qiujuan LÜ, Liping LIAN, Xindong ZHU. Wrapping phase repair method based on Tsallis Relative Entropy evaluation[J]. Optics and Precision Engineering, 2024, 32(8): 1130 Copy Citation Text show less
    Tsallis Relative Entropy phase evaluation method flow
    Fig. 1. Tsallis Relative Entropy phase evaluation method flow
    Phase-shifting interferogram
    Fig. 2. Phase-shifting interferogram
    Wrapped phase map
    Fig. 3. Wrapped phase map
    Phase quality evaluation results
    Fig. 4. Phase quality evaluation results
    Repair results after evaluating phase quality by different algorithms
    Fig. 5. Repair results after evaluating phase quality by different algorithms
    Figure 5 Partial Enlarged View
    Fig. 6. Figure 5 Partial Enlarged View
    Phase comparison of pixels in line 165
    Fig. 7. Phase comparison of pixels in line 165
    Phase comparison of pixels in line 240
    Fig. 8. Phase comparison of pixels in line 240
    Phase comparison of pixels in line 330
    Fig. 9. Phase comparison of pixels in line 330
    Phase-shifting interferogram
    Fig. 10. Phase-shifting interferogram
    Wrapped phase map
    Fig. 11. Wrapped phase map
    Phase quality evaluation results
    Fig. 12. Phase quality evaluation results
    Repair results after evaluating phase quality using different algorithms
    Fig. 13. Repair results after evaluating phase quality using different algorithms
    Figure 13 Partial Enlarged View
    Fig. 14. Figure 13 Partial Enlarged View
    Phase comparison of pixels in line 150
    Fig. 15. Phase comparison of pixels in line 150
    Phase comparison of pixels in line 205
    Fig. 16. Phase comparison of pixels in line 205
    Phase comparison of pixels in line 285
    Fig. 17. Phase comparison of pixels in line 285
    方法名称参数选取
    PDVTPDV=1.3
    调制度TM=0.2
    Tsallis相对熵q=0.8  TTsallis=86
    Table 1. Parameters used by each method
    方法残差点数减少残差点数占比
    原图475
    PDV4720.42%
    调制度38019.83%
    Tsallis相对熵23849.79%
    Table 2. Comparison of overall values
    方法名称参数选取
    PDVTPDV=1.2
    调制度TM=0.2
    Tsallis相对熵q=0.8  TTsallis=112
    Table 3. The second set of experiments used parameters
    方法残差点数减少残差点数占比
    原图340
    PDV3400.00%
    调制度350-2.94%
    Tsallis相对熵20938.53%
    Table 4. Comparison of overall values
    Leqian KANG, Pengcheng YANG, Qiujuan LÜ, Liping LIAN, Xindong ZHU. Wrapping phase repair method based on Tsallis Relative Entropy evaluation[J]. Optics and Precision Engineering, 2024, 32(8): 1130
    Download Citation