• Optics and Precision Engineering
  • Vol. 31, Issue 13, 1988 (2023)
Ming GUO1,2, Xingyu TANG1, Yunming LIU3,*, Changwei WANG4, and Yujin WEI4
Author Affiliations
  • 1School of Geomatics and Urban Spatial Informatics, Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Beijing0266, China
  • 2Engineering Research Centre of Representative Building and Architectural Heritage Database, Ministry of Education, Beijing100044, China
  • 3Beijing Urban Construction Survey and Design Institute Co, Beijing100101, China
  • 4College of Resources and Environment, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou51062, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.37188/OPE.20233113.1988 Cite this Article
    Ming GUO, Xingyu TANG, Yunming LIU, Changwei WANG, Yujin WEI. Ground deformation analysis along island subway line by fusing time-series InSAR and LiDAR techniques[J]. Optics and Precision Engineering, 2023, 31(13): 1988 Copy Citation Text show less
    Overview map of study area
    Fig. 1. Overview map of study area
    Route map of Xiamen No.2 line project
    Fig. 2. Route map of Xiamen No.2 line project
    Point cloud data and scope of study
    Fig. 3. Point cloud data and scope of study
    Water level distribution map
    Fig. 4. Water level distribution map
    Technology roadmap for ground deformation analysis along island subway line
    Fig. 5. Technology roadmap for ground deformation analysis along island subway line
    encapsulation and fit alignment
    Fig. 6. encapsulation and fit alignment
    3D analysis results
    Fig. 7. 3D analysis results
    Comparison results
    Fig. 8. Comparison results
    PS-InSAR deformation rate results
    Fig. 9. PS-InSAR deformation rate results
    SBAS-InSAR deformation rate results
    Fig. 10. SBAS-InSAR deformation rate results
    Local analysis maps
    Fig. 11. Local analysis maps
    Lv Chu cave-in accident site
    Fig. 12. Lv Chu cave-in accident site
    Accident area analysis selection map
    Fig. 13. Accident area analysis selection map
    Time-series settlement changes in accident area
    Fig. 14. Time-series settlement changes in accident area
    Two-dimensional comparison of selected section locations
    Fig. 15. Two-dimensional comparison of selected section locations
    模 式入射角/(°)分辨率/m

    幅宽/

    km

    极化方式
    条带成像20-455×580全极化
    干涉宽幅29-465×20250全极化
    超宽幅19-4720×40400全极化
    波浪22-355×520×20HH,VV
    Table 1. Parameters of sentinel-1A satellite imaging mode
    序号测段名称点号里程/km最大变化量/mm
    11号站右线MBY10K4+634.9-10.3
    22号站~3号站区间XZZ35,XZY36左K7+122.0、右K7+122.0-10.5,-10.8
    34号站左线SDZ2~SDZ13K38+264.0~K38+562.6-27.5
    44号站右线SDY2~SDY8K38+262.6~K38+502.6-27.9
    5某停车场出入场线区间左线R28K0+000.0-13.5
    6某停车场出入场线区间右线C01~C03K0+000.0~K0+060.0-16.6
    Table 2. Statistic of sections with accumulated settlement changes of more than 10 mm
    点名参考模型位置比较点云位置

    沉降值/

    mm

    XYZXYZ
    1-4.567 680.328 035.989 8-4.556 480.326 035.989 9-0.011 3
    2-2.118 284.808 436.002 8-2.102 084.809 236.002 90.016 3
    3-4.274 786.109 835.991 4-4.332 886.110 435.991 00.058 1
    4-2.314 089.432 236.001 8-2.209 989.433 136.002 30.104 1
    5-0.779 579.360 934.717 8-0.782 579.360 934.717 8-0.003 0
    6-5.749 781.716 534.717 8-5.753 181.673 734.717 80.042 9
    7-5.650 485.729 334.717 8-5.684 285.722 034.717 80.034 6
    8-0.764 288.055 934.717 8-0.744 988.062 634.717 80.020 5
    9-5.611 290.086 634.717 8-5.607 290.086 634.717 8-0.004 0
    10-6.009 080.547 233.151 9-6.012 080.547 433.151 90.003 0
    11-0.517 382.763 433.124 1-0.518 382.763 633.124 1-0.001 0
    12-5.983 185.781 133.151 7-5.958 885.780 933.151 6-0.024 2
    13-0.419 589.100 733.123 6-0.448 489.068 333.123 7-0.043 4
    14-5.893 190.703 733.151 3-5.923 790.690 233.151 40.033 5
    Table 3. Comparison of local point settlement
    Ming GUO, Xingyu TANG, Yunming LIU, Changwei WANG, Yujin WEI. Ground deformation analysis along island subway line by fusing time-series InSAR and LiDAR techniques[J]. Optics and Precision Engineering, 2023, 31(13): 1988
    Download Citation