JASMIN-based fast shielding effectiveness prediction of enclosure containing thin composite layer

Jinyu Zhong; Qiang Liu; Liping Yan; Xiang Zhao; Xuesong Meng; Haijing Zhou

doi:10.11884/HPLPB202133.210048

Journals >High Power Laser and Particle Beams >Volume 33 >Issue 5 >Page 053003 > Article

High Power Laser and Particle Beams
Vol. 33, Issue 5, 053003 (2021)

JASMIN-based fast shielding effectiveness prediction of enclosure containing thin composite layer

Jinyu Zhong¹, Qiang Liu², Liping Yan¹, Xiang Zhao¹, Xuesong Meng², and Haijing Zhou²

Author Affiliations

¹Department of Electronics and Information Engineering, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China

²Institute of Applied Physics and Computational Mathematics, Beijing 100088, China

show less

DOI: 10.11884/HPLPB202133.210048 Cite this Article

Jinyu Zhong, Qiang Liu, Liping Yan, Xiang Zhao, Xuesong Meng, Haijing Zhou. JASMIN-based fast shielding effectiveness prediction of enclosure containing thin composite layer[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2021, 33(5): 053003 Copy Citation Text

show less

Fig. 1. [in Chinese]

Download full size | View in the Article

Fig. 2. [in Chinese]

Download full size | View in the Article

Fig. 3. [in Chinese]

Download full size | View in the Article

Fig. 4. [in Chinese]

Download full size | View in the Article

Fig. 5. [in Chinese]

Download full size | View in the Article

Fig. 6. [in Chinese]

Download full size | View in the Article

Fig. 7. [in Chinese]

Download full size | View in the Article

RCF	MAD/dB	$ \rho $
10	0.5410	0.9962
20	0.5888	0.9964
40	0.6017	0.9965
60	0.6040	0.9965
80	0.6049	0.9965
100	0.6053	0.9965
200	0.6058	0.9965
250	0.6058	0.9965

Table 1. Variations of MAD and ρ with respect to the step size ratio of coarse (RFC) and fine meshes MAD和随粗细网格步长比的变化

a	MAD/dB	$ \rho $
0.4	0.5874	0.9963
0.5	0.5864	0.9965
0.6	0.5925	0.9965
0.7	0.6040	0.9965
0.8	0.6025	0.9965
0.9	0.6041	0.9965

Table 2. [in Chinese]

$ {R_{{\rm{\varepsilon }},k}}$	$ {p_{{\rm{\varepsilon }},k}}$
−9.993＋0.0j	−3.737＋0.0j
5.129＋0.0j	−1.898＋0.0j
−2.194＋0.0j	−0.323＋0.0j
1.699＋0.0j	−0.253＋0.0j

Table 3. [in Chinese]

model	type	method	total cells	computation time/s
model in Fig.3	nondispersive	software	2.31×10⁷	27950
model in Fig.3	nondispersive	SGBC-FDTD	0.64×10⁶	1181
model in Fig.4（a）	nondispersive	software	1.43×10⁷	66761
	nondispersive	SGBC-FDTD	0.71×10⁶	1056
	dispersive	software	1.23×10⁷	19586
	dispersive	SGBC-FDTD	0.71×10⁶	1467
model in Fig.4（b）	nondispersive	software	2.36×10⁷	28067
	nondispersive	SGBC-FDTD	0.71×10⁶	1537
	dispersive	software	1.29×10⁸	141281
	dispersive	SGBC-FDTD	0.71×10⁶	2540
model in Fig.4（c）	nondispersive	software	2.31×10⁷	31315
	nondispersive	SGBC-FDTD	0.64×10⁶	1523
	dispersive	software	1.26×10⁸	144824
	dispersive	SGBC-FDTD	0.64×10⁶	2501

Table 4. [in Chinese]

Download Citation

Save the article for my favorites

Paper Information