• Acta Geographica Sinica
  • Vol. 75, Issue 2, 348 (2020)
Daming LU1、1、2、2, Xinjun YANG1、1、3、3, Yuzhong SHI4、4, and Ziqiao WANG1、1
Author Affiliations
  • 1College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Northwest University, Xi'an 710127, China
  • 1西北大学城市与环境学院,西安 710127
  • 2School of Urban Planning and Design, Shenzhen Graduate School, Peking University, Shenzhen 518055, Guangdong, China
  • 2北京大学深圳研究生院城市规划与设计学院,深圳 518055
  • 3Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Earth Surface System and Environmental Carrying Capacity, Xi'an 710127, China
  • 3陕西省地表系统与环境承载力重点实验室,西安 710127
  • 4College of Geography and Environment Science, Northwest Normal University, Lanzhou 730070, China
  • 4西北师范大学地理与环境科学学院,兰州 730070
  • show less
    DOI: 10.11821/dlxb202002010 Cite this Article
    Daming LU, Xinjun YANG, Yuzhong SHI, Ziqiao WANG. Rural regime shifts and transformation development on the Loess Plateau[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2020, 75(2): 348 Copy Citation Text show less

    Abstract

    It is important to study rural transformation and development from the perspective of farmers' livelihood regime changes on the Loess Plateau. We selected cunties of Binxian, Changwu and Xunyi located in the apple growing area of the Loess Plateau, as a case study to construct the evolutionary path of rural regime, identify the micro factors that affect rural transformation and development, and reveal the mutual feedback mechanism between farmers' household regime and rural transformation. In doing so we adopted a regime change perspective, and applied the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process method, geodetector, and multiple linear regression. We obtained the following three findings. First, 27 of 130 selected samples, distributed mainly in areas with loess girder topography, belonged to the traditional agricultural regime. Meanwhile, 96 samples, distributed mainly in areas with loess tableland topography, belonged to the new agricultural regime. Another 7 samples, mainly distributed in valley areas, belonged to the non-agricultural regime. Second, when rural transformation sees the traditional agricultural regime replaced by the new agricultural regime, and finally the non-agricultural regime, the overall performance of rural development follows an inverted U-type development trend in a 3D space coordinate system. Simultaneously, rural population development follows an upward convex development trend in a 2D space coordinate system. Meanwhile, rural economic development follows an upward concave development trend, and agricultural production development follows an inverted U-type development trend, both in 2D space coordinate systems. Third, means of livelihood is the control variable that connects family system transformation and rural transformation development, which are determined by human and natural capital and directly affect financial and material capital at the farmer level. These aspects of transformation development are guided by the response process at the village level of three dimensions, namely population, economy and agriculture, and lead the process of rural transformation and development.
    Daming LU, Xinjun YANG, Yuzhong SHI, Ziqiao WANG. Rural regime shifts and transformation development on the Loess Plateau[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2020, 75(2): 348
    Download Citation