• Acta Photonica Sinica
  • Vol. 50, Issue 4, 172 (2021)
Cailin LI, Benya SU*, Baoyun GUO, Zhiyong WANG, and Fuhong ZHU
Author Affiliations
  • Institute of Architecture and Engineering, Shandong University of Technology, Zibo, Shandong255000China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/gzxb20215004.0415001 Cite this Article
    Cailin LI, Benya SU, Baoyun GUO, Zhiyong WANG, Fuhong ZHU. Camera Calibration Method with Multi-condition Constraints Based on Laser Points[J]. Acta Photonica Sinica, 2021, 50(4): 172 Copy Citation Text show less
    Flow of overall algorithm
    Fig. 1. Flow of overall algorithm
    3D control field with different postures
    Fig. 2. 3D control field with different postures
    Initial homonymy points selection of Confucius statue and stone
    Fig. 3. Initial homonymy points selection of Confucius statue and stone
    Three-dimensional reconstruction of Confucius statue before and after camera calibration
    Fig. 4. Three-dimensional reconstruction of Confucius statue before and after camera calibration
    Three-dimensional reconstruction of stone before and after camera calibration
    Fig. 5. Three-dimensional reconstruction of stone before and after camera calibration
    Reflection error
    Fig. 6. Reflection error
    Effect of laser point cloud reflection of Confucius and stone statue
    Fig. 7. Effect of laser point cloud reflection of Confucius and stone statue
    The error distribution of the total unit weight of each iteration in the adjustment process
    Fig. 8. The error distribution of the total unit weight of each iteration in the adjustment process
    DateNumber of imagesImage size(pixel×pixel)Number of image 3D pointsNumber of laser points
    Confucius statue623 168×2 1128 375713 209
    Stone393 168×2 11214 297313 937
    Table 1. Basic information of experiment data
    3D control fieldProposed method
    Confucius statueStone
    Initial parameters

    Parameters after

    calibration

    Initial parameters

    Parameters after

    calibration

    f(pixel)4 642.074 599.214 608.824 607.994 605.99
    x0(pixel)1 581.021 570.441 579.971 585.441 586.42
    y0(pixel)1 041.891 060.561 051.271 057.411 051.27
    k1-7.11×10-9-2.92×10-13-3.38×10-9-6.63×10-9-6.5×10-9
    k21.59×10-16-1.46×10-251.64×10-171.65×10-165.41×10-17
    k32.54×10-231.91×10-386.28×10-241.91×10-234.54×10-23
    p11.06×10-72.12×10-7-5.59×10-81.58×10-71.62×10-7
    p25.48×10-8-9.56×10-81.49×10-86.22×10-89.37×10-8
    σ00.224\0.363\0.260
    σI(pixel)0.257\0.356\0.242
    Table 2. Comparison of camera calibration results

    3D model

    accuracy

    Confucius statueStone
    Initial parametersParameters after calibrationInitial parametersParameters after calibration
    Accuracy19.814.817.912.4
    Integrity21.315.416.29.8
    Table 3. 3D reconstruction model accuracy statistics
    5%20%35%50%65%80%95%100%

    Confucius

    statue

    Number of laser points35 665142 661249 658356 604463 650570 647677 544713 209
    Density of laser points/m-22 8221 129119 76328 22836 70245 17253 63456 457
    σ00.4870.3940.3780.3690.3680.3680.3690.363
    σI/pixel0.4090.3680.3590.3590.3580.3590.3570.356
    StoneNumber of laser points15 69662 787109 877156 968204 059251 149298 240313 937
    Density of laser points/m-21 9867 94713 90819 86925 83031 79137 75239 739
    σ00.3890.2740.2630.2630.2620.2630.2640.260
    σI/pixel0.3660.2590.2460.2440.2500.2530.2430.242
    Table 4. Effect of different sampling proportions of laser point cloud on the accuracy of camera inspection
    Cailin LI, Benya SU, Baoyun GUO, Zhiyong WANG, Fuhong ZHU. Camera Calibration Method with Multi-condition Constraints Based on Laser Points[J]. Acta Photonica Sinica, 2021, 50(4): 172
    Download Citation