Author Affiliations
1Institute of Laser Engineering, Osaka University, Suita, Japan2National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology, Tokai, Japan3Tokamak Energy Ltd., Abingdon, UK4Graduate School of Engineering, Osaka University, Suita, Japan5Fukui University of Technology, Fukui, Japanshow less
Fig. 1. Partial nuclear chart around Zn and nuclear reactions with neutrons on a natural Zn target.
Cu,
Cu and
Cu are produced by (n, p) reactions with high-energy neutrons on
Zn,
Zn and
Zn, respectively.
Cu,
Cu and
Cu
are produced by (n, 2n) reactions on
Zn,
Zn and
Zn, respectively.
Cu and
Cu
are generated by (n, pn) reactions from
Zn and
Zn, respectively. High-energy neutrons could produce
Ni by the
Zn(n,
)
Ni reaction. Neutron capture also occurs.
Fig. 2. Experimental setup for the laser shot to generate neutrons. The laser is focused on the CD foil target. The Be neutron converter is placed 4 mm downstream of the CD foil. Behind the Be target, the Zn target was set in the hole at the center of the front surface.
Fig. 3. Fast neutron spectrum obtained from the TOF measurement. The neutron energies reached 17 MeV.
Fig. 4. -ray spectra measured for 120 h, 8.1 h, 5.1 h and 8 min. (a)–(c) The
-ray spectra integrated for 120 h. The background signal measured for 99 h was normalized to the target measurement of 120 h. (d) The
-ray spectrum measured for 8.1 h, where peaks corresponding to
Zn
m are observed. (e) The
-ray spectrum for 5.1 h, where peaks for
Ni are observed. (f) The
-ray spectrum for 8 min, which shows the
Cu
m peak at 526 keV.
Fig. 5. Cross sections used in the simulation calculation, which are taken from the JENDL-4.0 nuclear data library.
Fig. 6. Geometry of the calculation of the yield of
Cu using a laser for an optimized target system. (a) Cross-sectional view of the Be and
Zn target. (b) 3D image of the target.
| | | | | | Activity (Bq) |
---|
Nuclide |
${T}_{1/2}$
|
${E}_{\gamma }$
(keV) |
${I}_{\gamma }$
(
$\%$
) | Nuclear reaction | Quantities of the nuclides |
$t=0$
h |
$t=12$
h |
---|
|
${}^{63}$
Zn | 38.47 min | 669.62 | 8 |
${}^{64}$
Zn(n, 2n) | (9.3
$\pm$
0.8)
$\times$
10
${}^5$
| (28
$\pm$
2)
$\times$
10 | (6.5
$\pm$
0.6)
$\times {10}^{-4}$
| | | 962.06 | 6.5 | | | | |
${}^{65}$
Zn | 224.26 d | 1115.55 | 50.6 |
${}^{64}$
Zn(n,
$\gamma$
) and
${}^{66}$
Zn(n, 2n) | (1.45
$\pm$
0.15)
$\times$
10
${}^7$
| 0.52
$\pm$
0.05 | (5.2
$\pm$
0.5)
$\times {10}^{-1}$
|
${}^{69}$
Znm | 13.76 h | 438.6 | 94.77 |
${}^{68}$
Zn(n,
$\gamma$
) and
${}^{70}$
Zn(n, 2n) | (6.6
$\pm$
0.4)
$\times$
10
${}^5$
| 9.2
$\pm$
0.6 | 5.0
$\pm$
0.3 |
${}^{71}$
Zn | 2.45 min | 910.27 | 7.8 |
${}^{70}$
Zn(n,
$\gamma$
) |
$<$
1.5
$\times$
10
${}^5$
|
$<$
710 |
$<$
2.4
$\times {10}^{-86}$
|
${}^{71}$
Znm | 3.96 h | 386.28 | 93 |
${}^{70}$
Zn(n,
$\gamma$
) | (1.9
$\pm$
0.5)
$\times$
10
${}^4$
| 0.8
$\pm$
0.2 | (1.1
$\pm$
0.3)
$\times {10}^{-1}$
| | | 487.38 | 62 | | | | | | | 596.14 | 27.9 | | | | | | | 620.18 | 57 | | | | |
${}^{64}$
Cu | 12.7 h | 1345.84 | 0.473 |
${}^{64}$
Zn(n, p) | (5.9
$\pm$
0.5)
$\times$
10
${}^7$
| (89
$\pm$
8)
$\times$
10 | (4.7
$\pm$
0.4)
$\times {10}^2$
|
${}^{66}$
Cu | 5.12 min | 1039.23 | 9 |
${}^{66}$
Zn(n, p) and
${}^{67}$
Zn(n, np) | (2.03
$\pm$
0.25)
$\times$
10
${}^6$
| (458
$\pm$
56)
$\times$
10 | (2.1
$\pm$
0.3)
$\times {10}^{-39}$
|
${}^{67}$
Cu | 61.83 h | 93.3 | 16.1 |
${}^{67}$
Zn(n, p),
${}^{68}$
Zn(n, np) | (3.3
$\pm$
0.5)
$\times$
10
${}^5$
| 1.0
$\pm$
0.2 | (9.0
$\pm$
1.4)
$\times {10}^{-1}$
| | | 184.6 | 48.7 | | | | |
${}^{68}$
Cum | 3.75 min | 525.9 | 73 |
${}^{68}$
Zn(n, p) | (3.2
$\pm$
1.4)
$\times$
10
${}^4$
| 99
$\pm$
43 | (1.6
$\pm$
0.7)
$\times {10}^{-56}$
|
${}^{65}$
Ni | 2.52 h | 366.27 | 4.81 |
${}^{68}$
Zn(n,
$\alpha$
) | (1.8
$\pm$
0.2)
$\times$
10
${}^5$
| 14
$\pm$
2 | (5.1
$\pm$
0.6)
$\times {10}^{-1}$
| | | 1115.55 | 15.43 | | | | | | | 1481.84 | 24 | | | | |
|
Table 1. Produced nuclides and their half-lives,
-ray energies, emission probabilities of the
-rays, nuclear reactions, numbers and activities.
|
---|
| Activity (Bq) | |
---|
Nuclide | Experiment | Simulation | Exp/Sim ratio |
---|
|
${}^{63}$
Zn | (282
$\pm$
2)
$\times$
10 | 1.40 | 200 |
${}^{65}$
Zn | 0.52
$\pm$
0.05 | 0.19 | 2.8 |
${}^{69}$
Znm | 9.2
$\pm$
0.6 | 1.4 | 6.6 |
${}^{71}$
Zn |
$<$
710 | 30.6 |
$<$
23 |
${}^{71}$
Znm | 0.8
$\pm$
0.2 | 0.04 | 20 |
${}^{64}$
Cu | (89
$\pm$
8)
$\times$
10 | 37.2 | 23.9 |
${}^{66}$
Cu | (458
$\pm$
56)
$\times$
10 | 59.2 | 77.4 |
${}^{67}$
Cu | 1.0
$\pm$
0.2 | 0.02 | 50 |
${}^{68}$
Cum | 99
$\pm$
43 | 0.84 | 118 |
${}^{65}$
Ni | 14
$\pm$
2 | 0.35 | 40 |
|
Table 2. Experimental activities, calculated activities and their ratio of the obtained activities in the present experiment. The calculated activities were obtained using the PHITS simulation code with the measured neutron energy spectrum.