Fig. 1. Typical circuit diagram of PFN-Marx generator
Fig. 2. NRCC setup diagram of PFN-Marx generator
Fig. 3. Waveform of output pulse
Fig. 4. AE setup diagram of PFN-Marx generator
Fig. 5. Waveform of output pulse
Fig. 6. TTU setup diagram of PFN-Marx generator
Fig. 7. Structural diagram of a PFN
Fig. 8. PAL setup diagram of PFN-Marx generator
Fig. 9. Waveform of output pulse
Fig. 10. APELC circuit diagram of PFN-Marx generator
Fig. 11. Waveform of output pulse
Fig. 12. CAEP setup diagram of PFN-Marx generator
Fig. 13. Waveform of output pulse
Fig. 14. Indian setup diagram of PFN-Marx generator
Fig. 15. Peaking gap and the peaking capacitor
Fig. 16. Waveform of output pulse without peaking capacitor
Fig. 17. Waveform of output pulse with peaking capacitor
Fig. 18. CEAEA setup diagram of PFN-Marx generator
Fig. 19. Waveform of output pulse
Fig. 20. CAEP setup diagram of PFN-Marx generator
Fig. 21. Structural diagram of a PFN
Fig. 22. Waveform of output pulse
Fig. 23. NUDT setup diagram of PFN-Marx generator
Fig. 24. Waveform of output pulse
Fig. 25. NUDT structural diagram of a PFN
Fig. 26. Waveform of output pulse
setup | year | pulse width/ns | output voltage/kV | rising edge/ns | repetition rate/Hz | peak power/GW | impedance/Ω | energy density/(J·L−1)
| Note: NRCC—National Research Council of Canada, AE—Applied Energetics of USA, TTU—Texas Tech University of USA,CAEP—China Academy of Engineering Physics, CEAEA—Commissariat à l’Energie Atomique et aux Energies Alternatives of France, NUDT—National University of Defense Technology of China | NRCC | 2001 | 500 | 300 | 15 | 10 | 12 | 7.5 | 2 | AE | 2009 | 1000 | 500 | <200 | 5 | 5 | 50 | 2 | TTU | 2005 | 200 | 250 | <80 | 10 | 3.3 | 18.5 | 10 | CAEP | 2017 | 180 | 980 | 40 | 30 | 16 | 50 | 3 | CEAEA | 2018 | 85 | 400 | <5 | 100 | 1.6 | 100 | 2 | NUDT | 2020 | 90 | 540 | 45 | 30 | 5 | 50 | 6.5 |
|
Table 1. Comparison of typical device parameters