• High Power Laser and Particle Beams
  • Vol. 36, Issue 5, 055022 (2024)
Meng Shi1, Yibin Yang2, Dingfu Yang1, Kefeng Huang3,*..., Kai He1 and Zhen Wu1|Show fewer author(s)
Author Affiliations
  • 1Unit 32214 of PLA, Nanjing 211113, China
  • 2Unit 96784 of PLA, Luoyang 471300, China
  • 3College of Defense Engineering, Army Engineering University, Nanjing 210007, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.11884/HPLPB202436.230342 Cite this Article
    Meng Shi, Yibin Yang, Dingfu Yang, Kefeng Huang, Kai He, Zhen Wu. Optimization and evaluation of simulation model for diesel generator set with pulse load[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2024, 36(5): 055022 Copy Citation Text show less
    Structure topology of DGS-PL system
    Fig. 1. Structure topology of DGS-PL system
    Initial simulation model of DGS-PL system
    Fig. 2. Initial simulation model of DGS-PL system
    Comparison of AC output voltage waveforms between initial simulation and test
    Fig. 3. Comparison of AC output voltage waveforms between initial simulation and test
    Comparison of AC output current waveforms between initial simulation and test
    Fig. 4. Comparison of AC output current waveforms between initial simulation and test
    Comparison of AC frequency between initial simulation and test
    Fig. 5. Comparison of AC frequency between initial simulation and test
    AC output voltage waveforms of initial simulation and test
    Fig. 6. AC output voltage waveforms of initial simulation and test
    Waveforms of sample point 5000 to 5500 of ue and us
    Fig. 7. Waveforms of sample point 5000 to 5500 of ue and us
    Simulation model of diesel generator set with limiting reference excitation voltage
    Fig. 8. Simulation model of diesel generator set with limiting reference excitation voltage
    Topology of the BP neural network
    Fig. 9. Topology of the BP neural network
    Comparison waveforms of initial simulation, optimized simulation and test
    Fig. 10. Comparison waveforms of initial simulation, optimized simulation and test
    groupPk/kWD/%Ts/msR/%groupPk/kWD/%Ts/msR/%groupPk/kWD/%Ts/msR/%
    115102089.931030102086.811950102085.71
    215104091.091130104089.652050104089.39
    315108088.581230108089.772150108088.60
    415502090.061330502089.592250502087.69
    515504095.021430504093.402350504093.31
    615508092.881530508092.222450508091.85
    715902089.991630902084.242550902082.74
    815904090.701730904085.492650904085.57
    915908086.451830908084.752750908086.30
    Table 1. Real-time waveform proximity values of AC output voltage of initial simulation
    groupPk/kWD/%Ts/msIpk/AUac/V$\bar f $/HzVH/VVL/V
    13050234.91251.7349.274.204.00
    230501035.06250.6948.934.204.00
    330502034.83250.3749.114.204.00
    3640855635.71250.2649.215.004.50
    3740905634.02251.7848.686.004.60
    3850405635.01250.1948.996.004.00
    6315108035.24250.2348.934.003.70
    6415109036.58249.9648.784.003.65
    65151010037.05249.8849.024.003.65
    Table 2. Learning samples for BP neural network parameter recognition
    groupPk/kWD/%Ts/msR/%groupPk/kWD/%Ts/msR/%groupPk/kWD/%Ts/msR/%
    115102096.731030102094.171950102092.59
    215104099.141130104097.912050104094.37
    315108097.441230108096.372150108094.6
    415502097.011330502097.722250502093.11
    515504097.71430504098.872350504094.93
    615508096.691530508097.902450508094.48
    715902095.881630902096.182550902091.4
    815904095.421730904095.692650904092.37
    915908096.391830908093.832750908090.82
    Table 3. Real-time waveform proximity values of AC output voltage of optimized simulation
    Meng Shi, Yibin Yang, Dingfu Yang, Kefeng Huang, Kai He, Zhen Wu. Optimization and evaluation of simulation model for diesel generator set with pulse load[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2024, 36(5): 055022
    Download Citation