• Chinese Journal of Lasers
  • Vol. 50, Issue 14, 1404001 (2023)
Tong Liu1、*, Hao Chen2, Pengbin Guo1, Yu Shi1, Jiawei Li3, and Wenbin Wang1
Author Affiliations
  • 1Technology and Engineering Center for Space Utilization, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100094, China
  • 2Beijing Institute of Tracking and Telecommunications Technology, Beijing 100094, China
  • 3Lunar Exploration and Space Program Center, China National Space Administration, Beijing 100190, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/CJL220990 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Tong Liu, Hao Chen, Pengbin Guo, Yu Shi, Jiawei Li, Wenbin Wang. Research on a Simulation Model for Earth‐Moon Space Laser Time Transfer[J]. Chinese Journal of Lasers, 2023, 50(14): 1404001 Copy Citation Text show less
    World line of ground station and satellite in laser time transfer
    Fig. 1. World line of ground station and satellite in laser time transfer
    Difference in rate between clock onboard and TCB from 2024-01-01 to 2024-12-31
    Fig. 2. Difference in rate between clock onboard and TCB from 2024-01-01 to 2024-12-31
    Stochastic clock noise generated by stability index conversion method
    Fig. 3. Stochastic clock noise generated by stability index conversion method
    Stochastic clock noise generated by Kalman filter state equation method
    Fig. 4. Stochastic clock noise generated by Kalman filter state equation method
    Hadamard deviation of stochastic clock noise generated
    Fig. 5. Hadamard deviation of stochastic clock noise generated
    UTC time of laser pulse emission recorded by ground station
    Fig. 6. UTC time of laser pulse emission recorded by ground station
    UTC time of laser pulse reception recorded by ground station
    Fig. 7. UTC time of laser pulse reception recorded by ground station
    Arrival time of laser pulse recorded by onboard time scale
    Fig. 8. Arrival time of laser pulse recorded by onboard time scale
    Up-leg light time paired tLT1tcb
    Fig. 9. Up-leg light time paired tLT1tcb
    Round trip light time paired tLT1tcb
    Fig. 10. Round trip light time paired tLT1tcb
    Estimated and true clock offsets of ground-space time comparison on July 7th, 2023
    Fig. 11. Estimated and true clock offsets of ground-space time comparison on July 7th, 2023
    Estimated and true clock offsets of ground-space time comparison on July 9th, 2023
    Fig. 12. Estimated and true clock offsets of ground-space time comparison on July 9th, 2023
    Celestial bodyAnnual average value of Shapiro delay /ps
    Sun2.57448×104
    Earth1.49380×102
    Moon1.096880
    Jupiter1.11942×10-14
    Mars8.29461×10-18
    Mercury9.77377×10-18
    Neptune9.89399×10-17
    Pluto1.21671×10-20
    Saturn1.68908×10-15
    Uranus1.27810×10-16
    Venus1.81345×10-16
    Table 1. Annual average value of Shapiro delay caused by gravitational field of celestial bodies
    Tong Liu, Hao Chen, Pengbin Guo, Yu Shi, Jiawei Li, Wenbin Wang. Research on a Simulation Model for Earth‐Moon Space Laser Time Transfer[J]. Chinese Journal of Lasers, 2023, 50(14): 1404001
    Download Citation