• Chinese Journal of Lasers
  • Vol. 47, Issue 11, 1102003 (2020)
Yu Mengxiao1、2, Li Jia1、2、3, Li Zhuo1、2、3、*, Ran Xianzhe1、2、3, Zhang Shuquan1、2、4, and Liu Dong1、2、4
Author Affiliations
  • 1School of Material Science and Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China
  • 2National Engineering Laboratory of Additive Manufacturing for Large Metallic Components, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China
  • 3Ningbo Innovation Research Institute, Beihang University, Ningbo, Zhejiang 315800, China
  • 4Beijing Yuding Additive Research Institute Co., Ltd., Beijing 100096, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/CJL202047.1102003 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Yu Mengxiao, Li Jia, Li Zhuo, Ran Xianzhe, Zhang Shuquan, Liu Dong. Effect of Heat Treatment on Dynamic Mechanical Properties of AerMet100 Ultrahigh Strength Steel Fabricated by Laser Additive Manufacturing[J]. Chinese Journal of Lasers, 2020, 47(11): 1102003 Copy Citation Text show less
    Sketch of split Hopkinson pressure bar device
    Fig. 1. Sketch of split Hopkinson pressure bar device
    Microstructures of deposited AerMet100 steel by laser additive manufacturing. (a) ×1000; (b) ×2000
    Fig. 2. Microstructures of deposited AerMet100 steel by laser additive manufacturing. (a) ×1000; (b) ×2000
    Compressive stress-strain curves of as-deposited specimens. (a) Quasi static stress-strain curve; (b) dynamic stress-strain curves
    Fig. 3. Compressive stress-strain curves of as-deposited specimens. (a) Quasi static stress-strain curve; (b) dynamic stress-strain curves
    Microstructures of as-deposited specimens. (a) Uncompression; (b) compression strain rate of 4100 s-1, ×1000; (c) compression strain rate of 4100 s-1, ×5000
    Fig. 4. Microstructures of as-deposited specimens. (a) Uncompression; (b) compression strain rate of 4100 s-1, ×1000; (c) compression strain rate of 4100 s-1, ×5000
    Microstructures of HT-1 specimens. (a) Uncompression, ×2000; (b) uncompression, ×5000; (c) compression strain rate of 4000 s-1,×2000; (d) compression strain rate of 4000 s-1,×5000
    Fig. 5. Microstructures of HT-1 specimens. (a) Uncompression, ×2000; (b) uncompression, ×5000; (c) compression strain rate of 4000 s-1,×2000; (d) compression strain rate of 4000 s-1,×5000
    Microstructures of HT-2 specimens. (a) Uncompression, ×2000; (b) uncompression, ×5000; (c) compression strain rate of 4200 s-1,×2000; (d) compression strain rate of 4200 s-1,×5000
    Fig. 6. Microstructures of HT-2 specimens. (a) Uncompression, ×2000; (b) uncompression, ×5000; (c) compression strain rate of 4200 s-1,×2000; (d) compression strain rate of 4200 s-1,×5000
    Microstructures of HT-3 specimens. (a) Uncompression, ×2000; (b) uncompression, ×5000; (c) compression strain rate of 4200 s-1,×2000; (d) compression strain rate of 4200 s-1,×5000
    Fig. 7. Microstructures of HT-3 specimens. (a) Uncompression, ×2000; (b) uncompression, ×5000; (c) compression strain rate of 4200 s-1,×2000; (d) compression strain rate of 4200 s-1,×5000
    Dynamic impact fracture performance of laser additive manufactured AerMet100 steel in different heat treatment states(strain rate is about 4000 s-1). (a) Stress-strain curves; (b) shock absorption energy
    Fig. 8. Dynamic impact fracture performance of laser additive manufactured AerMet100 steel in different heat treatment states(strain rate is about 4000 s-1). (a) Stress-strain curves; (b) shock absorption energy
    Dynamic impact fracture morphology of as-deposited specimen. (a) Macro morphology; (b) elongate dimples in parabolic shape; (c) flat area
    Fig. 9. Dynamic impact fracture morphology of as-deposited specimen. (a) Macro morphology; (b) elongate dimples in parabolic shape; (c) flat area
    Dynamic impact fracture morphology of heat-treated specimens. (a)(b) HT-2 specimen; (c)(d) HT-3 specimen
    Fig. 10. Dynamic impact fracture morphology of heat-treated specimens. (a)(b) HT-2 specimen; (c)(d) HT-3 specimen
    ElementCCoNiCrMoSiMnFe
    Mass fraction /%0.2313.5011.263.001.250.022<0.005Bal.
    Table 1. Chemical composition of laser additive manufactured AerMet100 steel as-deposited plate
    SampleHeat treatment process
    AD
    HT-1885 ℃×1 h, oil quenching+(-196 ℃)×2 h+482 ℃×5 h, air cooling
    HT-2885 ℃×1 h, oil quenching+(-73 ℃)×1 h+482 ℃×5 h, air cooling
    HT-3885 ℃×1 h, oil quenching+(-73 ℃)×1 h+494 ℃×5 h, air cooling
    Table 2. Heat treatment process of laser additive manufactured AerMet100 ultra-high strength steel
    Yu Mengxiao, Li Jia, Li Zhuo, Ran Xianzhe, Zhang Shuquan, Liu Dong. Effect of Heat Treatment on Dynamic Mechanical Properties of AerMet100 Ultrahigh Strength Steel Fabricated by Laser Additive Manufacturing[J]. Chinese Journal of Lasers, 2020, 47(11): 1102003
    Download Citation