• Chinese Journal of Lasers
  • Vol. 51, Issue 12, 1202201 (2024)
Junyi Gu1, Wenqin Li1, Xuan Su2、*, Jie Xu1、2、3, and Bin Guo1、2、3、**
Author Affiliations
  • 1School of Materials Science and Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Shenzhen 518055, Guangdong , China
  • 2Zhengzhou Research Institute, Harbin Institute of Technology, Zhengzhou 450046, Henan , China
  • 3Key Laboratory of Micro-systems and Micro-structures Manufacturing of Ministry of Education, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150080, Heilongjiang , China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/CJL230927 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Junyi Gu, Wenqin Li, Xuan Su, Jie Xu, Bin Guo. Research on Laser Cleaning Process of Paint Layer on Carbon Fiber Composite Aircraft Skin[J]. Chinese Journal of Lasers, 2024, 51(12): 1202201 Copy Citation Text show less
    Morphologies of CFRP sample and composition of paint layer elements. (a) Macroscopic morphology of CFRP sample; (b) microscopic morphology of CFRP sample; (c) composition of paint layer elements
    Fig. 1. Morphologies of CFRP sample and composition of paint layer elements. (a) Macroscopic morphology of CFRP sample; (b) microscopic morphology of CFRP sample; (c) composition of paint layer elements
    Laser cleaning system
    Fig. 2. Laser cleaning system
    Measurement items of laser confocal microscope. (a) Laser cleaning depth; (b) surface roughness of laser cleaning area
    Fig. 3. Measurement items of laser confocal microscope. (a) Laser cleaning depth; (b) surface roughness of laser cleaning area
    Macroscopic morphologies of CFRP sample after laser cleaning
    Fig. 4. Macroscopic morphologies of CFRP sample after laser cleaning
    SEM images of CFRP samples after laser cleaning. (a1)(a2) Sample No. 22; (b1)(b2) sample No. 20; (c1)(c2) sample No. 25
    Fig. 5. SEM images of CFRP samples after laser cleaning. (a1)(a2) Sample No. 22; (b1)(b2) sample No. 20; (c1)(c2) sample No. 25
    3D profiles of laser cleaning areas of CFRP samples
    Fig. 6. 3D profiles of laser cleaning areas of CFRP samples
    3D profiles of cleaned-uncleaned boundary areas
    Fig. 7. 3D profiles of cleaned-uncleaned boundary areas
    Infrared thermal imaging patterns of samples at peak temperature
    Fig. 8. Infrared thermal imaging patterns of samples at peak temperature
    Infrared thermal imaging images. (a) Typical infrared thermal imaging feature of cleaning area; (b) temperature response curve during laser cleaning; (c)‒(h) infrared thermal imaging characteristics of samples at different moments during cleaning process (interval of 1/25 s)
    Fig. 9. Infrared thermal imaging images. (a) Typical infrared thermal imaging feature of cleaning area; (b) temperature response curve during laser cleaning; (c)‒(h) infrared thermal imaging characteristics of samples at different moments during cleaning process (interval of 1/25 s)
    Dynamic behavior during laser cleaning
    Fig. 10. Dynamic behavior during laser cleaning
    ParameterLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5
    Laser power /W100150200250300
    Scanning speed /(mm/s)30002500200015001000
    Repetition frequency /kHz2025303540
    Overlap ratio /%9080706050
    Table 1. Experimental variables and levels
    Order No.P /WV /(mm/s)f /kHzη /%Order No.P /WV /(mm/s)f /kHzη /%
    1100300020901420015002070
    2100250025801520010002560
    3100200030701625030003580
    4100150035601725025004070
    5100100040501825020002060
    6150300025701925015002550
    7150250030602025010003090
    8150200035502130030004060
    9150150040902230025002050
    10150100020802330020002590
    11200300030502430015003080
    12200250035902530010003570
    1320020004080
    Table 2. Orthogonal array (L25)
    Sample No.HSaT
    Measured valueS/NMeasured valueS/NMeasured valueS/N
    16.40 μm16.124.28 μm12.63396.2 ℃-51.96
    27.20 μm17.152.33 μm7.35349.3 ℃-50.86
    38.80 μm18.891.09 μm0.75301.2 ℃-49.58
    43.30 μm10.371.23 μm1.80302.0 ℃-49.60
    51.90 μm5.583.40 μm10.63344.1 ℃-50.73
    63.00 μm9.541.48 μm3.41311.9 ℃-49.88
    72.90 μm9.250.88 μm-1.11271.3 ℃-48.67
    82.00 μm6.021.01 μm0.09272.2 ℃-48.70
    935.86 μm31.094.35 μm12.77552.5 ℃-54.85
    1037.97 μm31.594.89 μm13.79485.7 ℃-53.73
    112.40 μm7.601.20 μm1.58295.0 ℃-49.40
    1258.70 μm35.376.27 μm15.95590.4 ℃-55.42
    1342.90 μm32.652.52 μm8.03433.7 ℃-52.74
    1416.20 μm24.191.55 μm3.81377.3 ℃-51.53
    1520.70 μm26.322.43 μm7.71404.3 ℃-52.13
    1612.20 μm21.732.29 μm7.20410.0 ℃-52.26
    1715.70 μm23.922.12 μm6.53370.2 ℃-51.37
    189.82 μm19.841.19 μm1.51293.9 ℃-49.36
    1911.70 μm21.361.93 μm5.71327.3 ℃-50.30
    20140.50 μm42.959.74 μm19.77599.6 ℃-55.56
    216.90 μm16.782.11 μm6.49298.1 ℃-49.49
    229.90 μm19.911.54 μm3.75264.5 ℃-48.45
    2370.09 μm37.019.02 μm19.10506.5 ℃-54.09
    2444.50 μm32.973.16 μm9.99508.6 ℃-54.13
    2543.40 μm32.757.24 μm17.19467.1 ℃-53.39
    Table 3. Values and S/N statistics of H, Sa, and T
    LevelAverage S/N response for HAverage S/N response for SaAverage S/N response for T
    PVfηPVfηPVfη
    K113.6214.3522.3332.516.636.267.1016.0450.5550.6051.0154.38
    K217.5021.1222.2827.225.796.498.669.2751.1650.9551.4552.74
    K325.2322.8822.3321.867.425.906.206.3452.2550.8951.4751.15
    K425.9624.0021.2516.518.146.828.443.2851.7752.0851.8749.85
    K527.8827.8422.0012.1011.3113.828.894.3551.9153.1151.8449.52
    σ14.2613.481.0820.425.527.9232.7012.771.702.510.874.86
    Rank234132413241
    Table 4. Average S/N response
    SourceDFAdj-SSAdj-MSF valueP'Rate of contribution /%
    P4755.94188.9914.530.00128.72
    V4490.28122.579.430.00418.62
    f44.281.070.080.9860.16
    η41329.64332.4125.56050.51
    Error8104.03131.98
    Total242684.17
    Table 5. Results of variance analysis in H
    SourceDFAdj-SSAdj-MSF valueP'Rate of contribution /%
    P489.7922.458.50.00610.15
    V4224.4456.1121.24025.36
    f426.896.722.540.1223.04
    η4522.87130.7249.47059.07
    Error821.142.642.39
    Total24885.13
    Table 6. Results of variance analysis in Sa
    SourceDFAdj-SSAdj-MSF valueP'Rate of contribution /%
    P49.072.279.130.0047.66
    V422.015.522.15018.56
    f42.480.622.490.1262.09
    η482.9720.7483.48069.09
    Error81.990.251.69
    Total24118.51
    Table 7. Results of variance analysis in T
    Junyi Gu, Wenqin Li, Xuan Su, Jie Xu, Bin Guo. Research on Laser Cleaning Process of Paint Layer on Carbon Fiber Composite Aircraft Skin[J]. Chinese Journal of Lasers, 2024, 51(12): 1202201
    Download Citation