• Resources Science
  • Vol. 42, Issue 6, 1074 (2020)
Wei DUAN and Bo OUYANG*
Author Affiliations
  • College of Economics and Management, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.18402/resci.2020.06.06 Cite this Article
    Wei DUAN, Bo OUYANG. Impacts of protected areas on multidimensional poverty of surrounding rural households:Analysis of the intermediary effect based on social capital[J]. Resources Science, 2020, 42(6): 1074 Copy Citation Text show less
    Analytical framework of protected areas and multidimensional poverty of rural households
    Fig. 1. Analytical framework of protected areas and multidimensional poverty of rural households
    调研时间保护区名称所属地区保护区等级面积/(hm2建立年份调研村数调研户数
    2018年7月千佛山四川安州国家级110831993445
    长青陕西洋县国家级299061994458
    太白山陕西太白国家级563251965470
    黄柏塬陕西太白国家级218652006234
    牛尾河陕西太白省级134922004228
    皇冠山陕西宁陕省级123722001466
    2018年10月唐家河四川青川国家级400001978464
    蜂桶寨四川宝兴国家级390391975462
    2019年1月卧龙四川汶川国家级2000001963460
    龙溪-虹口四川都江堰国家级310001993460
    鞍子河四川崇州省级101411993460
    黑水河四川大邑省级317901993460
    小河沟四川平武省级282271993460
    老河沟四川平武县级110002013460
    Table 1. Basic information of the sampled protected areas and the number of samples
    指标被剥夺临界值权重
    人均年纯收入/元家庭人均年纯收入小于2952元赋值1,其余赋值00.1
    做饭用水做饭用水为非自来水/桶装水/纯净水/过滤水赋值1,其余赋值00.1
    做饭燃料做饭燃料以薪柴或煤为主赋值1,其余赋值00.1
    通电情况家中没通电或经常断电赋值1,其余赋值00.1
    厕所形式家中为非室外/室内冲水厕所赋值1,其余赋值00.1
    垃圾处理家附近没有固定/分类垃圾点赋值1,其余赋值00.1
    子女教育家中有6~16岁的子女未接受完义务教育赋值1,其余赋值00.1
    医疗服务患病不能及时获得正规医疗机构就医赋值1,其余赋值00.1
    儿童死亡家中有5岁以下儿童死亡赋值1,其余赋值00.1
    金融服务无法获得贷款或借款赋值1,其余赋值00.1
    Table 2. Selection and definition of multidimensional poverty indicators
    指标一级指标权重变量具体定义二级权重指标
    社会网络0.443家里办红白喜事本村有多少人来帮忙(用实际数据与最大值之比表示)0.123
    常与您走动的亲朋好友中能人数量(用实际数据与最大值之比表示)0.361
    参加多少个经济组织(用实际数据与最大值之比表示)0.086
    是否有亲戚在城市生活(1=是;0=否)0.177
    互联网上网人数(用实际数据与最大值之比表示)0.253
    社会信任0.388对村干部是否信任(1=非常信任;0.75=比较信任;0.5=一般;0.25=比较不信任;0=非常不信任)0.582
    对本村村民是否信任(1=非常信任;0.75=比较信任;0.5=一般;0.25=比较不信任;0=非常不信任)0.309
    对陌生人是否信任(1=非常信任;0.75=比较信任;0.5=一般;0.25=比较不信任;0=非常不信任)0.109
    社会参与0.169去年人情送礼支出(用实际数据与最大值之比表示)0.833
    去年参加村集体活动程度(1=20次以上;0.75=10~20次;0.5=5~10次;0.25=5次以下;0=没有参加过)0.167
    Table 3. Selection of social capital indicators and definition of variables
    变量名称全部样本保护区内保护区外F
    均值均值均值
    多维贫困0.155(0.124)0.166(0.134)0.145(0.113)5.003**
    社会资本0.383(0.108)0.371(0.100)0.394(0.113)9.026**
    社会网络0.221(0.110)0.214(0.103)0.228(0.116)2.789*
    社会信任0.671(0.230)0.651(0.220)0.689(0.237)5.347**
    社会参与0.149(0.118)0.141(0.094)0.156(0.136)3.120*
    户主年龄/周岁53.476(11.584)52.973(12.127)53.939(11.056)1.316
    户主性别(1=男;0=女)0.901(0.299)0.906(0.292)0.896(0.306)0.228
    户主是否是村干部(1=是;0=否)0.152(0.320)0.143(0.307)0.160(0.332)0.510
    外出务工人数/人0.794(11.005)0.697(0.950)0.883(1.047)6.536**
    平均受教育年限/年7.118(2.660)6.959(2.765)7.264(2.555)2.477
    居住地距镇市场距离/km8.092(10.942)8.972(12.969)7.281(8.602))4.531**
    人均住宅面积/m266.805(96.721)59.806(42.328)73.253(127.509)3.664*
    人均农地面积/亩1.088(1.819)0.917(1.611)1.246(1.981)6.206**
    人均林地面积/亩8.810(24.197)12.843(30.616)5.093(15.297)19.865***
    观测值757363394
    Table 4. Descriptive statistics of the variables
    变量名称总体保护区等级开展生态旅游所在省份
    国家级省级四川陕西
    居住地位置0.174**-0.179*0.638***0.0010.292**0.0380.465**
    (0.087)(0.108)(0.141)(0.117)(0.130)(0.103)(0.156)
    户主年龄0.008**0.0070.0090.012**0.0020.008*0.008
    (0.004)(0.005)(0.006)(0.005)(0.006)(0.004)(0.007)
    户主性别-0.234-0.256-0.205-0.331*-0.197-0.238-0.559*
    (0.143)(0.176)(0.231)(0.199)(0.203)(0.159)(0.298)
    户主是否是村干部-0.103-0.270*0.216-0.129-0.060-0.320*0.272
    (0.136)(0.161)(0.232)(0.186)(0.197)(0.163)(0.228)
    外出务工人数0.004-0.0660.128*-0.0050.0040.0160.022
    (0.043)(0.054)(0.070)(0.059)(0.065)(0.052)(0.075)
    平均受教育年限-0.123***-0.128***-0.136***-0.159***-0.091***-0.135***-0.135***
    (0.017)(0.021)(0.027)(0.023)(0.025)(0.021)(0.026)
    居住地距镇市场距离0.012***0.0070.016***0.0020.024***0.010*0.009
    (0.004)(0.005)(0.006)(0.005)(0.006)(0.006)(0.006)
    人均住宅面积-0.008*-0.001-0.001-0.001-0.001-0.001-0.001
    (0.001)(0.001)(0.001)(0.001)(0.001)(0.001)(0.001)
    人均农地面积0.0260.0150.0190.0060.032-0.0210.001
    (0.024)(0.033)(0.036)(0.049)(0.029)(0.036)(0.033)
    人均林地面积0.020.003-0.0010.004-0.0010.003-0.002
    (0.001)(0.003)(0.003)(0.004)(0.002)(0.004)(0.002)
    常数项2.284***2.510***1.868***2.397***2.196***2.103***2.760***
    (0.304)(0.378)(0.488)(0.430)(0.437)(0.361)(0.546)
    调整R20.1230.1130.1520.1520.1030.1130.162
    观测值757432325373384507250
    Table 5. Total effects of protected areas on multidimensional poverty of rural households
    路径Ⅰ:保护区对传导机制的影响系数路径Ⅱ:传导机制对多维贫困的影响系数保护区对多维贫困的中介效应系数Sobel检验(Z值/P值)Bootstrap检验(Z值/P值)中介效应占比/%
    保护区➝社会资本-0.022**社会资本➝多维贫困-0.229***0.005**Z值:2.523Z值:2.54028.734
    (0.008)(0.040)(0.002)P值:0.012P值:0.011
    保护区➝社会网络-0.013*社会网络➝多维贫困-0.108*0.001Z值:1.420Z值:1.4908.802
    (0.008)(0.041)(0.001)P值:0.156P值:0.138
    保护区➝社会信任-0.033**社会信任➝多维贫困-0.078***0.003*Z值:1.778Z值:1.66014.784
    (0.017)(0.019)(0.001)P值:0.075P值:0.097
    保护区➝社会参与-0.020**社会参与➝多维贫困-0.196***0.004**Z值:2.101Z值:2.18022.139
    (0.009)(0.036)(0.002)P值:0.036P值:0.029
    Table 6. Intermediary effects of protected areas on multidimensional poverty of rural households (whole sample)
    保护区分类路径Ⅰ:保护区对传导机制的影响系数路径Ⅱ:传导机制对多维贫困的影响系数保护区对多维贫困的中介效应系数Sobel检验(Z值/P值)Bootstrap检验(Z值/P值)中介效应占比(%)
    国家级保护区➝社会资本-0.012社会资本➝多维贫困-0.203***0.002Z值:1.027Z值:1.04010.980
    (0.011)(0.049)(0.002)P值:0.304P值:0.298
    省级保护区➝社会资本-0.030***社会资本➝多维贫困-0.261***0.008**Z值:2.129Z值:2.24012.341
    (0.011)(0.070)(0.004)P值:0.033P值:0.025
    开展生态旅游保护区➝社会资本-0.033**社会资本➝多维贫困-0.173***0.006**Z值:2.159Z值:2.09025.644
    (0.011)(0.054)(0.003)P值:0.031P值:0.037
    未开展生态旅游保护区➝社会资本-0.004社会资本➝多维贫困-0.248***0.001Z值:0.321Z值:0.3302.737
    (0.011)(0.059 )(0.003)P值:0.748P值:0.744
    四川省保护区➝社会资本-0.014社会资本➝多维贫困-0.178***0.003Z值:1.257Z值:1.22024.156
    (0.010)(0.049)(0.002)P值:0.209P值:0.224
    陕西省保护区➝社会资本-0.078***社会资本➝多维贫困-0.185***0.015*Z值:1.841Z值:1.78028.577
    (0.030)(0.071)(0.008)P值:0.066P值:0.075
    Table 7. Intermediary effects of protected areas on multidimensional poverty of rural households (sub-sample sets)
    Wei DUAN, Bo OUYANG. Impacts of protected areas on multidimensional poverty of surrounding rural households:Analysis of the intermediary effect based on social capital[J]. Resources Science, 2020, 42(6): 1074
    Download Citation