Fig. 1. Block diagram of multifunctional laser protection goggles and laser detection and alarm composite device
Fig. 2. Multifunctional laser protection goggles and laser protection detection and alarm composite device
Fig. 3. Schematic diagram of optical structure of multifunctional laser protective goggles
Fig. 4. Block diagram of laser detection and alarm circuit
Fig. 5. Optical path diagram of laser protection performance test
Fig. 6. Continuous laser and supercontinuum laser protection performance test platform
Fig. 7. Pulse laser protection and alarm performance test platform
sample number | emission mode | average optical density value | | relative standard deviation/% | 532 nm | 1064 nm | 470 nm | 808 nm | 532 nm | 1064 nm | 470 nm | 808 nm | Note: M− pulse laser; L − continuous laser; * static; ** dynamic
A − optical plastic absorption type (SL);
B − colored optical glass absorption type (BL);
C − nonlinear optical material absorption type (FXX);
D − nano-composite optical material absorption type (NM);
E − glass absorption + dielectric film reflection compound type (JZF);
F − polycarbonate absorption type (JT);
G − photoelectric switch polarization attenuation type (GD);
H − holographic grating diffraction attenuation type (QX).
| A-SL4-001 | M | 4.31 | 4.11 | | | | 0.48 | 1.69 | | | A-SL4-002 | M | 4.98 | 4.00 | | | | 2.51 | 1.61 | | | A-SL4-003 | M | 4.01 | 3.97 | | | | 1.55 | 1.81 | | | B-BL10-001 | M | | 4.72 | | | | | 0.28 | | | B-BL10-002 | M | | 4.51 | | | | | 2.59 | | | B-BL10-003 | M | | 4.46 | | | | | 1.39 | | | B-BL15-001 | M | | 5.24 | | | | | 0.11 | | | B-BL15-002 | M | | 4.60 | | | | | 0.22 | | | B-BL15-003 | M | | 4.61 | | | | | 0.20 | | | C-FXX1-001 | M | | 1.87 | | | | | 0.55 | | | D-NM1-001 | M | 4.05 | 4.00 | | | | 0.38 | 1.61 | | | D-NM7-001 | M | 2.56 | 4.15 | | | | 0.74 | 1.25 | | | E-JZF1-001 | M | 4.98 | 4.72 | | | | 0.58 | 0.63 | | | E-JZF1-002 | M | 4.83 | 4.18 | | | | 0.64 | 0.79 | | | F-JT1-001 | M | 5.93 | 4.51 | | | | 0.52 | 0.76 | | | G-GD-01-001* | M | 5.83 | 4.76 | | | | 0.07 | 0.06 | | | G-GD-02-002** | M | 4.72 | 4.74 | | | | 0.28 | 0.07 | | | H-QX1-001 | M | 2.24 | | | | | 0.89 | | | | A-SL1-001 | L | 4.07 | | 4.06 | | | 0.04 | | 0.46 | | A-SL1-002 | L | 4.05 | | 4.16 | | | 0.51 | | 0.34 | | A-SL1-003 | L | 3.96 | | 4.08 | | | 0.52 | | 0.62 | | A-SL4-001 | L | 4.65 | | 4.34 | 1.99 | | 1.36 | | 0.03 | 0.52 | A-SL4-002 | L | 4.66 | | 5.05 | 2.11 | | 1.37 | | 1.16 | 0.34 | A-SL4-003 | L | 4.31 | | 4.25 | 2.15 | | 0.58 | | 0.35 | 0.67 | B-BL10-001 | L | | | | 1.67 | | | | | 0.27 | B-BL15-001 | L | | | | 5.96 | | | | | 2.70 | B-BL1-001 | L | 3.53 | | | | | 0.24 | | | | B-BL3-001 | L | 4.65 | | | | | 0.20 | | | | D-NM3-001 | L | 3.28 | | 3.44 | | | 0.48 | | 0.78 | | D-NM4-001 | L | 3.25 | | 3.38 | | | 0.68 | | 0.77 | | D-NM7-001 | L | 2.73 | | 3.12 | | | 0.22 | | 0.31 | |
|
Table 1. Protection performance test results of multi-wavelength laser protective spectacles
sample number | emission mode | average optical density value | | relative standard deviation/% | 532 nm | 1064 nm | 470 nm | 808 nm | 532 nm | 1064 nm | 470 nm | 808 nm | Note: M − pulse laser; L − continuous laser
* protection spectacles 1 left; ** protection spectacles 1 right; # protection spectacles 2 left; # # protection spectacles 2 right
| SL4-BL10-BL15 * | M | 5.33 | 6.72 | | | | 0.14 | 0.12 | | | SL4-BL10-BL15 ** | M | 5.32 | 6.71 | | | | 0.26 | 0.31 | | | SL4-BL10-BL15 # | M | 5.18 | 6.33 | | | | 0.37 | 0.15 | | | SL4-BL10-BL15 # # | M | 5.18 | 6.33 | | | | 0.14 | 0.06 | | | SL4-BL10-BL15 | L | 4.43 | | 4.18 | 5.55 | | 0.95 | | 0.39 | 1.42 | SL4-BL10--001 | L | 4.58 | | 4.76 | 5.33 | | 1.56 | | 0.35 | 0.62 | SL4-BL15--001 | L | 4.45 | | 4.85 | 5.49 | | 1.04 | | 0.89 | 2.71 |
|
Table 2. Protection performance test results of composite multi-wavelength laser protective spectacles
sample
number
| OD | S | | OD | S | | OD | S | | OD | S | | OD | S | | OD | S | | OD | S | mean
optical
density
| mean relative
standard
deviation/%
| 532 nm | 1 064 nm | 470 nm | 808 nm | 1 400 nm | 1 700 nm | 1 800 nm | Note: OD − optical density; S − relative standard deviation (%); * protection spectacles 1 left; ** protection spectacles 1 right; # protection spectacles 2 left; # # protection spectacles 2 right | SL4-BL10-BL15 * | 2.10 | 0.46 | | 2.08 | 0.92 | | 2.26 | 0.21 | | 2.29 | 0.48 | | 4.12 | 0.62 | | 3.72 | 0.11 | | 3.79 | 1.04 | 2.91 | 0.55 | SL4-BL10-BL15 ** | 2.08 | 0.72 | | 2.05 | 0.70 | | 2.26 | 0.37 | | 2.31 | 0.48 | | 3.99 | 1.12 | | 3.80 | 0.58 | | 3.84 | 0.44 | 2.90 | 0.63 | SL4-BL10-BL15 # | 2.13 | 0.85 | | 2.06 | 0.55 | | 2.32 | 0.35 | | 2.35 | 0.43 | | 4.14 | 0.33 | | 3.88 | 1.15 | | 3.81 | 0.68 | 2.96 | 0.62 | SL4-BL10-BL15 # # | 2.11 | 0.47 | | 2.07 | 0.49 | | 2.30 | 0.46 | | 2.37 | 0.55 | | 4.12 | 1.07 | | 3.84 | 0.78 | | 3.82 | 0.89 | 2.95 | 0.67 |
|
Table 3. Protection performance test results of composite supercontinuum laser protective spectacles
sample number | OD | S | | OD | S | | OD | S | | OD | S | mean optical
density
| mean relative
standard
deviation/%
| 532 nm | 1 064 nm | 470 nm | 808 nm | Note: OD − optical density; S − relative standard deviation (%) | SL-4 | 1.06 | 0.19 | | 1.69 | 0.48 | | 1.09 | 0.20 | | 1.19 | 0.20 | 1.26 | 0.27 | BL10 | 0.69 | 1.39 | | 1.39 | 0.32 | | 0.69 | 0.27 | | 0.69 | 0.23 | 0.87 | 0.55 | BL15 | 1.20 | 0.35 | | 2.04 | 0.40 | | 1.20 | 0.35 | | 1.33 | 0.17 | 1.44 | 0.32 |
|
Table 4. Test results of protection performance of supercontinuum laser protective spectacles
sample
number
| incidence
angle
| E | H | S | | E | H | S | | laser alarm response | 532 nm | 1 064 nm | light | sound | vibration | dual-spectacles
recombination
| cluster
linkage
| Note: E − average laser irradiation energy (nJ); H − average laser radiant exposure (10−7 J/cm2); S − relative standard deviation (%); Y − responsive; N − no response
| LZK-01 | +30 | 49.53 | 2.53 | 1.78 | | 18.32 | 0.93 | 0.58 | | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | +15 | 49.48 | 2.52 | 2.94 | | 18.03 | 0.92 | 1.20 | | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | 0° | 41.94 | 2.14 | 0.79 | | 20.01 | 1.02 | 0.52 | | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | −15 | 48.09 | 2.45 | 2.14 | | 18.59 | 0.95 | 2.21 | | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | −30 | 48.33 | 2.47 | 1.45 | | 18.48 | 0.94 | 2.12 | | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | LZK-02 | +30 | 68.34 | 3.49 | 0.69 | | 43.31 | 2.21 | 1.54 | | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | +15 | 68.29 | 3.48 | 1.08 | | 43.69 | 2.23 | 2.25 | | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | 0° | 66.08 | 3.37 | 2.89 | | 44.33 | 2.26 | 0.85 | | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | −15 | 68.43 | 3.49 | 0.93 | | 43.55 | 2.22 | 1.84 | | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | −30 | 68.76 | 3.51 | 0.67 | | 44.16 | 2.25 | 0.93 | | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y |
|
Table 5. Test results of laser protection detection and alarm performance