• Chinese Journal of Lasers
  • Vol. 47, Issue 8, 804001 (2020)
Mo Zeqiang1、2、3, Yu Jin1、2、*, He Jianguo1、2、3, Wang Jinduo1、2, Liu Yang1、3, Dai Shoujun1、2, Wang Xiaodong1、2, Meng Jingjing1、2, and Xu Yuyang1
Author Affiliations
  • 1Optical Engineering Department, Aerospace Information Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100094, China
  • 2School of Optoelectronics, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
  • 3Key Laboratory of Computational Optical Imaging Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100094, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/CJL202047.0804001 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Mo Zeqiang, Yu Jin, He Jianguo, Wang Jinduo, Liu Yang, Dai Shoujun, Wang Xiaodong, Meng Jingjing, Xu Yuyang. Method for Measurement Range Extension of Cavity Ring-Down Spectroscopy Based on Threshold Modification[J]. Chinese Journal of Lasers, 2020, 47(8): 804001 Copy Citation Text show less
    Influence of setting sampling threshold on detection accuracy under different decay time and relationship between detection accuracy and ring-down time when threshold is fixed. (a) Relationship between detection accuracy and threshold; (b) relationship between detection accuracy and ring-down time when VT=80 mV
    Fig. 1. Influence of setting sampling threshold on detection accuracy under different decay time and relationship between detection accuracy and ring-down time when threshold is fixed. (a) Relationship between detection accuracy and threshold; (b) relationship between detection accuracy and ring-down time when VT=80 mV
    Setting threshold and ring-down time versus methane detection range. (a) Setting threshold versus methane detection range; (b) ring-down time versus methane detection range
    Fig. 2. Setting threshold and ring-down time versus methane detection range. (a) Setting threshold versus methane detection range; (b) ring-down time versus methane detection range
    Schematic of CRDS experimental device
    Fig. 3. Schematic of CRDS experimental device
    Detection accuracy and signal-to-noise ratio at each setting threshold
    Fig. 4. Detection accuracy and signal-to-noise ratio at each setting threshold
    Thresholds and ring-down time under different methane concentrations. (a) Thresholds under different methane concentrations; (b) ring-down curve of methane standard gas with volume fraction of 1.0×10-6 when τ=24.57 μs and VT=238.54 mV; (c) ring-down curve of methane standard gas with volume fraction of 1.0×10-4 when τ=1.36 μs and VT=5.36 mV
    Fig. 5. Thresholds and ring-down time under different methane concentrations. (a) Thresholds under different methane concentrations; (b) ring-down curve of methane standard gas with volume fraction of 1.0×10-6 when τ=24.57 μs and VT=238.54 mV; (c) ring-down curve of methane standard gas with volume fraction of 1.0×10-4 when τ=1.36 μs and VT=5.36 mV
    Measurement results of methane standard gas with each concentration
    Fig. 6. Measurement results of methane standard gas with each concentration
    Quoted error under different measurement ranges
    Fig. 7. Quoted error under different measurement ranges
    Mo Zeqiang, Yu Jin, He Jianguo, Wang Jinduo, Liu Yang, Dai Shoujun, Wang Xiaodong, Meng Jingjing, Xu Yuyang. Method for Measurement Range Extension of Cavity Ring-Down Spectroscopy Based on Threshold Modification[J]. Chinese Journal of Lasers, 2020, 47(8): 804001
    Download Citation