• Chinese Journal of Lasers
  • Vol. 48, Issue 11, 1110005 (2021)
Fahua Shen1, Peng Zhuang2、3、4, Bangxin Wang2、3、4, Chenbo Xie2、3、*, Chengqun Qiu1、**, Dong Liu2、3, and Yingjian Wang2、3
Author Affiliations
  • 1Jiangsu Province Intelligent Optoelectronic Devices and Measurement-Control Engineering Research Center, Department of Physics and Electronic Engineering, Yancheng Teachers University, Yancheng, Jiangsu 224002, China
  • 2Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Optics Anhui Institute of Optics and Fine Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei, Anhui 230031, China
  • 3Advanced Laser Technology Laboratory of Anhui Province, Hefei, Anhui 230037, China
  • 4Science Island Branch of Graduate School, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui 230026, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/CJL202148.1110005 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Fahua Shen, Peng Zhuang, Bangxin Wang, Chenbo Xie, Chengqun Qiu, Dong Liu, Yingjian Wang. Research on Retrieval Method of Low-Altitude Wind Field for Rayleigh-Mie Scattering Doppler Lidar[J]. Chinese Journal of Lasers, 2021, 48(11): 1110005 Copy Citation Text show less
    Measurement principle of the Rayleigh-Mie scattering Doppler frequency based on FPI
    Fig. 1. Measurement principle of the Rayleigh-Mie scattering Doppler frequency based on FPI
    Optical path of the Rayleigh-Mie scattering Doppler lidar receiver
    Fig. 2. Optical path of the Rayleigh-Mie scattering Doppler lidar receiver
    Normalized Rayleigh-Brillouin scattering spectra under different pressure conditions
    Fig. 3. Normalized Rayleigh-Brillouin scattering spectra under different pressure conditions
    FPI transmittance curves of two edge channels
    Fig. 4. FPI transmittance curves of two edge channels
    Transmittance curves of two FPI in the atmosphere at different altitudes. (a) 60 m; (b) 1020 m
    Fig. 5. Transmittance curves of two FPI in the atmosphere at different altitudes. (a) 60 m; (b) 1020 m
    Effective frequency response functions at different altitudes. (a) 60 m; (b) 1020 m
    Fig. 6. Effective frequency response functions at different altitudes. (a) 60 m; (b) 1020 m
    Wind speed inversion errors at different altitudes
    Fig. 7. Wind speed inversion errors at different altitudes
    Number of photoelectrons output by three detectors
    Fig. 8. Number of photoelectrons output by three detectors
    Radial wind speeds obtained by different methods. (a) Traditional method; (b) our method
    Fig. 9. Radial wind speeds obtained by different methods. (a) Traditional method; (b) our method
    Aerosol backscattering ratio obtained by our method. (a) Rβ change curve with altitude; (b) error change curve with altitude
    Fig. 10. Aerosol backscattering ratio obtained by our method. (a) Rβ change curve with altitude; (b) error change curve with altitude
    Horizontal wind speed measurement results of different methods. (a) Horizontal wind speed measurement profile; (b) difference of horizontal wind speed at the same altitude
    Fig. 11. Horizontal wind speed measurement results of different methods. (a) Horizontal wind speed measurement profile; (b) difference of horizontal wind speed at the same altitude
    Differences of the same altitude data for different methods. (a) 0.27--5.27 km; (b) 0.27--10.27 km
    Fig. 12. Differences of the same altitude data for different methods. (a) 0.27--5.27 km; (b) 0.27--10.27 km
    Fahua Shen, Peng Zhuang, Bangxin Wang, Chenbo Xie, Chengqun Qiu, Dong Liu, Yingjian Wang. Research on Retrieval Method of Low-Altitude Wind Field for Rayleigh-Mie Scattering Doppler Lidar[J]. Chinese Journal of Lasers, 2021, 48(11): 1110005
    Download Citation